1
   

Insuring an empty house

 
 
Reply Thu 5 May, 2005 10:41 pm
I have a house that was being rented. Due to some water damage that is being repaired right now the house is sitting empty. To complicate matters that insurance company did not contact the mortgage company when the policy was switched from single home dwelling to a "commercial" property. Therefore, they sent the payments to the wrong office. Now the insurance company is saying that they policy is cancelled.

They won't reinstate the original policy and they are saying they can't insure a house that is not being lived in. The house is not liveable right now because there was so much damage from the water.

Does anyone know the ins and outs of insurance that would be able to tell me if the insurance company is trying to pull a fast one? I'm just not sure if I'm getting the right story and facts from them.

Thanks in advance for your help.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 4,169 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 08:20 am
Re: Insuring an empty house
imdtckdkr wrote:
Does anyone know the ins and outs of insurance that would be able to tell me if the insurance company is trying to pull a fast one? I'm just not sure if I'm getting the right story and facts from them.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Most insurers will not insure vacant rental properties. If you look at your previous policy, you'll probably find a clause that states that the policy will be cancelled automatically if the property remains vacant for more than thirty days. Vacant properties are bigger risks -- for a variety of easily imaginable reasons -- so insurers will simply not cover them. You might be able to get a policy to cover your vacant property; expect, however, to pay much higher premiums.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 May, 2005 08:27 am
I ran into a similar problem about six years ago with a vacant house. We were able to get fire insurance but nothing else was covered and we did pay much higher premiums.
0 Replies
 
imdtckdkr
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 May, 2005 07:18 am
<sigh>
Thanks for your help! I was really hoping there were companies out there that would understand my dilema. Oh well! Thanks again.
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 May, 2005 08:08 am
Well, fire is the most important of the policies, I think. The previous company ought to be able to help you or tell you who will. They should have said that in the beginning.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 May, 2005 02:39 pm
Fire/Theft/Liability--all are important.

Suppose an arsonous trespasser steals the plumbing fixtures and while loading them in the truck trips and breaks his leg.....
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jun, 2005 11:29 pm
When my mother died, I sold her house in New York. I had to have someone go in at least every 30 days to satisfy the insurance company, especially since it was winter and the pipes could have frozen if the heat went out.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Insuring an empty house
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 12:18:19