1
   

2005 A2K Elections

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:40 pm
You don't like whipped cream?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:43 pm
I do not like a tax on carrots.
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:45 pm
That's weird, nimh, your plan is almost the opposite of mine.

We're giving out free carrots. In fact that's the whole plan.

And all kinds of carrots too.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:45 pm
They would need to tax paperclips, looking at the generous programs the "Whiners" have outlined for the common people.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:48 pm
Ah - see, this is where the input of voters like you is so valuable. You are totally right of course, dlowan. We need to make a crucial change in our programme. Thank you so much for pointing out its acute flaw. The added purchasing tax will not be levied on carrots - it will be levied on lentils, instead.

Moreover, there will be home-baked brownies for all throughout Soz's term. I make a mean brownie, if I say so myself. And I will happily retreat to making brownies for the duration of Soz & Farmerman's term once this campaign is over. So that's two bonuses in one strike.

Aahh ... <floats away in peaceful dreams of making brownies and leaving the stress and drudgery behind>

Carrot cake's possible too, of course. I have to practice still on my carrot cake myself, but in the meantime I know a good address where they make 'em amazing ... <nods>

You see? Other campaigns make blanket promises. We hone our pledges to the specific needs of our constituents!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:50 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
They would need to tax paperclips, looking at the generous programs the "Whiners" have outlined for the common people.

This from the "Sex and Bribes Party", which promises free chocolate fountains and fast cars for all ... <smirks>
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 05:57 pm
http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0PwD5AhQSJipk0*UjBOF8JEtXwd3kFzgEqYKmVOGA*N6uOD9Anr785KAm9b0wwB*vvS0JCSTK0OkJb*CnDRagg*5!XhFjLLM4/BLP.JPG
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 06:19 pm
nimh wrote:
dlowan wrote:
So - what does your party stand for Nimh?

Securing a decent working wage for all. Safeguarding pensions and benefits. Facilitating equal opportunities for all children. Investing in public schools, rewarding teachers in high-pressure schools with an annual bonus. Promoting transparency and expanding multinationals' accountability to the public. We are not against privatisation per se, but insist on avoiding the kind of semi-privatisation that leads to private monopolies, run by government-subsidised but profit-making corporations without accountability.

Fair trade. Robust support for democratic movements around the world, regardless of narrow national interest. Suspension of loans and development aid to dictatorships, and divertion of funding directly to NGO's. Cancelling the debts of the poorest countries to First World states. Empowering international organisations. Clamping down on trafficking of women and children.

Tackling discrimination: ensuring every woman has the opportunity to work. But promoting part-time work that will enable both parents to spend more time with their children. Facilitating flex work, but empowering flex workers. Better sex education to counter teenage pregnancies and make fewer abortions necessary. But retaining a woman's choice. Limiting access to guns. Tackling racial and religious discrimination, for example by obliging companies to report annually how many people of minority background they have hired. Relentlessly persecuting extremist terrorists. Enlisting the expertise of (minority) community organisations to bolster a united front against extremism. Protection of sheep and other farm animals against abuse.


I can make a list of global issues just as well. How do you propose to tackle them? There certainly ain't enough in the budget to do what 200 governments and UN have not been able to achieve within past 50 years.
Good luck there, buddy!

Now, let's return to a sensible platform: love and beauty for all. Yeah.
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 06:23 pm
If you are elected our leaders, and can truly offer love and beauty for ALL, then you as our leaders would only be status quo.

We need more eminent, and distinguished... and (Scoates flips through his thesaurus) um... "illustrious" leaders.

Someone who would stick out in a crowd.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 06:27 pm
Our message is loud and clear: We are all the same. Brothers and sisters. We do not wish to stick out, merely because we are all beautiful and wise. We are the common people's people! only a bit prettier and smarter, but that only to Reprezent!
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 06:30 pm
So, what you are saying, Dag, is that you don't like anyone who sticks out? Anyone who might be a little DIFFERENT than YOU and your CRONIES, you mean? Are you trying to start a master race? I wouldn't put it past you, you bigot!!!!
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 06:31 pm
Well... as long as you represent...

Still, I think having a leader who is smarter than the people coudl make them insecure.

I'm gravely more idiotic, which makes me perfect for slander and parady--surely a prerequisite to office.

I presume the people would rather let out their steam on an obvious inferior, and I am deliberately ignorant to that end. I offer myself as a scapegoat.

I offer myself as the PEOPLE'S scapegoat. Which is what they truly need.
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 08:13 pm
kickycan wrote:
So, what you are saying, Dag, is that you don't like anyone who sticks out? Anyone who might be a little DIFFERENT than YOU and your CRONIES, you mean? Are you trying to start a master race? I wouldn't put it past you, you bigot!!!!


Oh, isn't that just the saddest thing? Poor kicky. He's become delusional. <sigh>

Kicky...Please lie back down and I'll have the nice nurse give you another one of those happy shots. You really shouldn't be getting yourself all worked up, in your condition. One more temper tantrum, and that could be the end for you.

Ah, there's the doctor. Doc, what does his prognosis look like? Should he even have computer access while recovering from a gunshot to the head? Yes, I thought you'd agree. What? You'll have the nurse pull his plug as soon as the shot kicks in?!?!?!?! No, No, you can't do that!!! Oh. You meant his computer plug. Oh. Good. Whew, that's better.
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 08:16 pm
SCoates wrote:
So the truth comes out. The Love and Beauty part can't even spell their own name. They can't even keep track of personal issues. How could we hope for them to take responsibility for anything additional?


At least we can spell "party." In fact, you could even call us the Party party. See, I spelled it right twice. Cool
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 08:17 pm
<are there any chocolate-free zones?>
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 08:22 pm
Sure, if that's what you really want, Beth. Our party doesn't force itself on anyone. If you want chocolate or champagne, feel free to help yourself. But if not, we'll still love you.

And we promise not to tax you at all. We have plenty of money already.
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Apr, 2005 09:42 pm
Eva wrote:
SCoates wrote:
I spelled it right twice. Cool


I'm impressed.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Apr, 2005 12:36 am
Remember, folks:

http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0PwD5AhQSJipk0*UjBOF8JEtXwd3kFzgEqYKmVOGA*N6uOD9Anr785KAm9b0wwB*vvS0JCSTK0OkJb*CnDRagg*5!XhFjLLM4/BLP.JPG
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Apr, 2005 02:36 pm
nimh wrote:
Securing a decent working wage for all. Safeguarding pensions and benefits. Facilitating equal opportunities for all children. Investing in public schools, rewarding teachers in high-pressure schools with an annual bonus. Promoting transparency and expanding multinationals' accountability to the public. We are not against privatisation per se, but insist on avoiding the kind of semi-privatisation that leads to private monopolies, run by government-subsidised but profit-making corporations without accountability.

Fair trade. Robust support for democratic movements around the world, regardless of narrow national interest. Suspension of loans and development aid to dictatorships, and divertion of funding directly to NGO's. Cancelling the debts of the poorest countries to First World states. Empowering international organisations. Clamping down on trafficking of women and children.

Tackling discrimination: ensuring every woman has the opportunity to work. But promoting part-time work that will enable both parents to spend more time with their children. Facilitating flex work, but empowering flex workers. Better sex education to counter teenage pregnancies and make fewer abortions necessary. But retaining a woman's choice. Limiting access to guns. Tackling racial and religious discrimination, for example by obliging companies to report annually how many people of minority background they have hired. Relentlessly persecuting extremist terrorists. Enlisting the expertise of (minority) community organisations to bolster a united front against extremism. Protection of sheep and other farm animals against abuse...


<zzzzzzzzz> Oh, sorry, I fell asleep there.

And just HOW, pray tell, would they propose to solve all the world's ills and protect all the livestock using only the infinitesmal budget of A2K, I ask? They would have to raise your taxes, that's how. No, they would have to garnish your entire paycheck, and then some.

This is an election for the A2K Presidency, good people, not for Supreme Being!

Let's be sensible. Craven says we don't need your money, a little green text here and there is all that's needed. We believe him. The Love & Beauty Party will never ask you for money. We don't need it. Love is All You Need.

The real question is...why do Farmerman/Sozobe/Zippy/Nimh REALLY want all your money? I believe the answer is clear. They're after nothing less than world domination. Nimh, the self-proclaimed "Karl Rove of the Sense, Reason and Solidarity vote" has cleverly invented his party's slogan, "You know it makes sense." Well, Mr. Rove, it is indeed starting to make sense. And it is frightening.

Even the sheep are running away.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Apr, 2005 04:12 pm
<giggles>
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » 2005 A2K Elections
  3. » Page 9
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.55 seconds on 06/03/2025 at 06:28:15