0
   

Not about America? Who cares?

 
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 06:21 pm
I've been following this as well.....
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 06:25 pm
Yeah - The Chinese see Japan as helping the US in the event war over Taiwan breaks out. Possible resurgent Japanese militarism.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 06:32 pm
The bottom line is that, from a Chinese point of view, Japan has to be discredited and made to lose face. If the textbook issue hadn't been so handy, Hu and his minions would have come up with something else, maybe accused Japanese fishermen of violating Chinese waters or whatever. Fearing a resurgence of Japanese militarism isn't all that far-fetched -- again, from China's point of view, I mean. There are Japanese soldiers in Iraq, the first time a Japanese military presence has been sent out of the country since WW II. They're not combat troops, but still. . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 06:39 pm
The problem the Chinese leadership face, though, is that they must continue to invent pretexts for directing the anger and discontent of people elsewhere. This is why i say they are playing with fire--unless they wish to unleash the dragon they are awakening, they need to constantly provide a focus for the anger and resentment of the people, lest it turn upon them. So, the question becomes, to my mind, how far are they willing to ante to keep their hand hidden, and what happens if someone calls their bet?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 06:40 pm
Merry Andrew wrote:
The bottom line is that, from a Chinese point of view, Japan has to be discredited and made to lose face. If the textbook issue hadn't been so handy, Hu and his minions would have come up with something else, maybe accused Japanese fishermen of violating Chinese waters or whatever. Fearing a resurgence of Japanese militarism isn't all that far-fetched -- again, from China's point of view, I mean. There are Japanese soldiers in Iraq, the first time a Japanese military presence has been sent out of the country since WW II. They're not combat troops, but still. . .


Fishing rights? What about drilling rights? Wasn't there something recently about Japan drilling in disputed waters between them and China?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Apr, 2005 03:40 pm
Japan Criticizes China History Textbooks

Sunday April 24, 2005 6:46 PM

By JOSEPH COLEMAN

Associated Press Writer

TOKYO (AP) - Japan opened a new front in its dispute with China on Sunday by sharply criticizing Beijing's history textbooks, signaling continued friction between the Asian powers despite high-profile diplomatic moves to quell tensions.

Japanese Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura refuted Chinese claims that Japanese textbooks gloss over Tokyo's World War II-era atrocities, firing back in a TV talk show Sunday that China's schools indoctrinate their students with an unbalanced take on the past.

``There is a tendency toward this in any country, but the Chinese textbooks are extreme in the way they uniformly convey the 'our country is correct' perspective,'' Machimura said, echoing Sunday's editorial in Japan's largest newspaper accusing China of nationalistic education.

Machimura said Tokyo would officially inform Beijing of its opinion of Chinese textbooks after fully reviewing them. He said China's state councilor and former foreign minister, Tang Jiaxuan, had invited him to do so during a recent discussion.

The firm language reflected Japan's sometimes contradictory approach in handling the conflict with China, which erupted into a string of violent anti-Japanese protests in Chinese cities after Tokyo approved the latest version of a textbook by nationalist historians. China claims the books play down such Japanese wartime atrocities as mass sex slavery and germ warfare.

Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on Friday made the most public apology in a decade for his country's bloody march through Asia in the 1930s and 1940s, and then pressed hard for a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao on the sidelines of a regional summit in Indonesia.

Despite the diplomatic push, Tokyo also has sent strong signals that it will not be bullied by Beijing. Just hours before Koizumi made his apology, some 80 lawmakers, including a Cabinet member, paid homage at a Tokyo war shrine that China criticizes for honoring war criminals.

Machimura also mixed his attack on Chinese textbooks with praise of the Koizumi-Hu meeting Saturday, saying of China: ``They're next door. We can't move. They're important and we're important to each other.''

The diplomatic moves have calmed some of the fury on the Chinese side, where the government has been tightening controls on protesters over the past week. Despite the troubles, Japan is a major source of investment in China's rapidly expanding economy.

Chinese state media urged protesters to stay off the streets Sunday, and dozens of paramilitary troops guarded the Japanese Embassy in Beijing, where demonstrators in past weeks have thrown rocks with little interference from police.

Hong Kong's Cable TV reported that more than 300 people in the southern city of Zhuhai marched to a Japanese-owned factory but were blocked by police. The broadcaster said the crowd eventually dispersed.

Officials in Zhuhai denied the report.

``There were no anti-Japan protests,'' said a city official who gave only his surname, Zhang.

The recent tensions come after several years of troubled relations between Japan and China, whose emergence as an economic power is making it Tokyo's competitor for influence in Asia.

Though Beijing is incensed by Koizumi's annual visits to the Yasukuni war shrine, the differences go far beyond interpretations of World War II history. The two are feuding over the ownership of East China Sea islands, gas exploration rights, the division of exclusive economic zones and Tokyo's bid for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council.

Hu made a direct mention of broader problems following the meeting with Koizumi, saying that Tokyo must refuse to support any moves toward independence by Taiwan. The self-ruled island and the mainland split during civil war in 1949, but Beijing still claims it as its territory.

---

Associated Press reporter Min Lee in Hong Kong contributed
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Apr, 2005 04:20 pm
Heehee - true! Tu quoque.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 12:42:25