Lash wrote:If you care to elaborate on what that brain physiologist said, I'd be quite interested.
Well, it was a five-minute interview, about half of which were about describing the facts of the Schiavo case to the German audience. He didn't say whether he concurred with the PVS diagnosis, but for the purpose of the interview he implicitly did. Most of what he said was about what patients in a
Wachkoma (coma vigil), as he called it, can and cannot do. Judging by some quick Googling, the definitions for
coma vigil and persistent vegetative state are practically the same.
Lash wrote:Also, I wouldn't have expected this story to carry internationally. What would you say is the general opinion about it there?
Like Americans, we have a continuous debate here about the ethics of euthanasia and abortion. The Terri Schiavo case kind of fits in on the euthanasia side, even though patients like her are neither brain-dead nor dying. General opinion is about as divided about both issues in Germany as it is in America, though our laws are much more 'conservative' than yours. (One of the things I find ironic about the American debate is how the same liberals who urge that American law adapt to international standards decency about punishment (capital and otherwise), ignore those standards in their end-of-life and beginning of life positions.) The feelings about Terri Schiavo don't run nearly as high here. Her case is more like a journalistic hook to discuss the general issue.