Reply
Mon 21 Feb, 2005 08:49 pm
If someone would please be so kind as to help me i have a slight delimma. This is my first, and my last year in the Lincoln-Douglass Debate for UIL as it is my senior year. However, there is no coaching available for this category as only one person in my school really understands how it works, and i am to debate against him. the resolution is Resolved: Equalization of funding is desirable for Texas Public Schools[/b] I had several ideas how to go about constructing an argument, however, as i dont know what im doing, i keep getting lost and losing my whole point of the argument. One idea was to base it off of Darwinism for the negative case, stating that like Darwins evolution, only the stronger schools that can adapt and take care of themselves will stay open for their students. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you all!
I think you could find much stronger arguments, sweetheart.
Because there is a flaw in your thesis. Really bad schools often DO stay open.
If you'd like to entertain some arguments, I'd be happy to give it a go...
Is there any chance you could help me out here. ive never done this before, and i am already understanding that i am in way over my head here. I dont really know how to proceed.
general systems theory axiom one = Any system can operate in failure mode indifinitely. (See the US House of Representatives)