That has nothing to do with your attempt at debunking GW.
Allow me to decide what has to do with my efforts . I listed those figures to show the difficulty of measuring sea levels . Sea levels are only an indicator of the amount of land ice that melts . Land ice measurements are a guess . The amount that melts is debatable . The problem with ice melting is in doesnt occur in days . There is latent heat involved, and the ice melting now may have been warming for hundreds of years . The large ice sheets that covered Europe and America in the last glacial advance, despite having only an ocean between them, melted at different rates and started to disappear at different times. There is not enough geology in this green GW rubbish .
Merely posing a flick without any understanding of what you can do with it, doesnt help any arguments that are supposed to be "open minded"
I think I know what you mean, but the term flick is lost on me . I do at least try to be open minded but I tend to lose that when the likes of parados get abusive . GW is the new religion and scientists are the new priests .
Your statement that the IPCC should disband itself
Just a bit of light ribbing at them, but my point was have any scientists said I cant use the research money because we have found in the negative, so we are a shutting the place down . Did NASA do that after getting up to the moon or did it re-invent itself and keep spending ? What would IPCC do with information contrary to its political agenda ?