70
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 06:30 pm
@MontereyJack,
MJ, I think we have much bigger problems than carbon to worry about, don't you? things like spending ourselves into oblivion and wars going on all over the world.
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 06:41 pm
@okie,
Greenies like power and power grows out of the barrel of a gun . If they dont have Global Warming to threaten us with, how can they be powerful ??
okie
 
  2  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 07:20 pm
@Ionus,
I kind of had it figured out before I heard Rush Limbaugh express the same belief, that the radical green movement was the new home of radical socialists and Marxists, and anti-capitalists. That includes one worlders and folks like that as well. Guys like George Soros falls into that group. Gobal warming offers to them a convenient vehicle to try to obtain the power they so desperately crave
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 10:50 pm
Remarkable. Ionus's post simply makes no sense, and okie and Rush manage to pile half a dozen ultraright memes together and create still another new conspiracy theory.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 7 Apr, 2011 11:04 pm
@okie,
As I've said before, too: that's why I believe, the Christians put it on their agenda. (They even have "One-World-Shops" in every larger town!)
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 04:56 am
@MontereyJack,
So the only people in the world NOT looking for power are the greenies ? They dont want to have anything that they can threaten us with ? So if GW turns out to be rubbish, the greenies will just go home and watch tely....they wont go looking for something else ?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 06:31 am
@Ionus,
Check out the Ecuador greenies Io. They are after $70 a barrel for not pumping it up. A billion barrels of it. They are threatening to ruin the flora and fauna if we don't pay up.

Perhaps they will want paying not to go to the car-boot sale next.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Apr, 2011 12:08 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Remarkable. Ionus's post simply makes no sense, and okie and Rush manage to pile half a dozen ultraright memes together and create still another new conspiracy theory.
Its not really a conspiracy theory, MJ. I would liken it more to a bunch of birds of the same species all congregating or flocking o the same place, beause they like what is there. What is in the green movement is a lust for centralized power and group thinking. Groupees are attracted to that, because they tend to have a religion revolving around the idea that big government can take care of them and solve every problem in the world

In contrast, conservatives are more individualists that believe in individual responsiblity and individual freedom, and we tend to go to our God for solving any problems that we may have. And we believe our rights were endowed by God, our Creator. That is what the Declaration of Independence declares, and that is why we are proudly American. That also helps explain why so many radical liberals tend to dislike America, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright is one example. He railed against the evils of Jews, capitalism and rich white people, and essentially said the U.S. deserved 9/11. If one went back in a time machine to the 30's, you could almost think it was Hitler railing instead of Wright.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 06:47 pm
@okie,
Charles Manson speaks out on global warming, ha ha. That is not much of a surprise I don't think. I am sure the warmers will be glad to have his support and leadership in the fight to save the planet!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/19/charles-manson-reportedly-breaks-20-year-silence-talk-global-warming/?test=latestnews

"Charles Manson broke a 20-year silence on the 40th anniversary of his conviction in the murders of eight people, including actress Sharon Tate, to speak out about the so-called perils of global warming, the U.K. Daily Mail reports."
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 07:25 pm
@okie,
Quote:
I would liken it more to a bunch of birds of the same species all congregating or flocking o the same place
Its a watering hole...they even have pigs with their snout in the trough .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 07:27 pm
@okie,
Now thats the sort of credible support they need .
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2011 12:38 am
@Ionus,
Indeed, a Vanity Fair (Spanish edition) article, reported in the Daily Mail. And that again is reported in by Foxnews.

To quote him: "La hierba mala no muere."
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 09:28 am
Another example of a whacked out radical in the Obama administration. Van Jones wants to grant human rights to nature. Does that mean if we kill a cockroach, a rat, or cut a tree down, or even mow our grass in the future, could we be convicted of a crime or even executed for it? Well, where could a mindset like that lead? Those are logical questions for unhinged and radical philosophies that would bring about obvious consequences as a result. Remember, Van Jones is the communist Marxist guy that Obama tried to appoint, and of course that was ignored except for the conservative press.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/25/obama-adviser-van-jones-helping-push-rights-mother-nature/

"Van Jones, the Obama administration's controversial former "green jobs czar," has found a new calling: helping to push for a new, global architecture of environmental law that would give Mother Nature the same rights status as humans."
parados
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 09:33 am
@okie,
NEWS FLASH..
Fox News tells lies about the Pachamama Alliance

This is what they are doing Okie..
Quote:
Our mission is to empower indigenous people of the
Amazon rainforest to preserve their lands and culture

I realize the people at Fox are so stupid they don't realize that "indigenous people" are people, but certainly you can figure that out.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 09:38 am
@parados,
So, typical of you, parados, attack the messenger instead of having any evidence that the message is inaccurate. It is you that is stupid, or ignorant, probably willingly so. I know your game, parados. The truth stands. Van jones is a radical, period, and he was only one of many that the radical Obama either tried or succeeded to appoint to his administration.
parados
 
  0  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 09:54 am
@okie,
And if Fox posted that Van Jones sacrifices small babies. I would be wrong if I pointed out that Fox News is lying because they can say whatever they want simply because Van Jones is disliked?
It's Fox that is attacking someone without a basis okie. I quoted from the group they are slandering.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 08:16 pm
@parados,
Fox never accused Jones of that. Stick to the news report about what they said about Jones. I do not see anything inaccurate about what they reported.

Why do you constantly use nonsensical extremes in your arguments, parados? If Fox said there was a war in Libya, are you going to accuse them of lying, just because you don't like Fox? At least have the honesty to judge reporting on its merit, rather than who is doing the reporting.
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 26 Apr, 2011 08:29 pm
@okie,
Parados is incapable on intellectual honesty .
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2011 07:06 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Fox never accused Jones of that. Stick to the news report about what they said about Jones. I do not see anything inaccurate about what they reported.

Why do you constantly use nonsensical extremes in your arguments, parados? If Fox said there was a war in Libya, are you going to accuse them of lying, just because you don't like Fox? At least have the honesty to judge reporting on its merit, rather than who is doing the reporting.

I did judge the reporting on it's merits. You just can't seem to understand that Fox's propaganda includes some truths so you will swallow the lies.
okie
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 27 Apr, 2011 04:09 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
okie wrote:

Fox never accused Jones of that. Stick to the news report about what they said about Jones. I do not see anything inaccurate about what they reported.

Why do you constantly use nonsensical extremes in your arguments, parados? If Fox said there was a war in Libya, are you going to accuse them of lying, just because you don't like Fox? At least have the honesty to judge reporting on its merit, rather than who is doing the reporting.
I did judge the reporting on it's merits.
No, you did not. You accused Fox of lying without any evidence to support your claim. But then again I have found this to be standard practice for you.
Quote:
You just can't seem to understand that Fox's propaganda includes some truths so you will swallow the lies.
Your propaganda, lies and distortions are far more prevalent than Fox's. Your propaganda is also more slanted and biased. I will have to agree with Ionus, that "Parados is incapable of intellectual honesty ."
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/26/2024 at 06:44:54