76
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Jan, 2026 06:56 am
Germany’s spruce‑dominated forests are collapsing due to drought and bark‑beetle infestations, part of a wider European trend due to climate change.
Scientists argue that replacing vulnerable monocultures with more diverse, climate‑resilient forests is essential to restore carbon sinks and prevent further ecological decline.

Germany’s dying forests are losing their ability to absorb CO2. Can a new way of planting save them?
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Jan, 2026 07:26 am
Plants can’t absorb as much CO2 as climate models predicted

New research reveals that Earth’s plants may be far less effective at soaking up excess CO2 than climate models have long assumed

Quote:
High levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a major driver of climate change. At the same time, increased CO2 can encourage plants to grow faster, allowing them to absorb more carbon and potentially slow warming. That benefit, however, depends on whether plants have access to enough nitrogen, a nutrient that is essential for growth. Scientists have only recently taken a closer look at how much nitrogen is actually available in nature. New research involving the University of Graz shows that the so-called CO2 fertilization effect has been significantly overstated.

Plants cannot use nitrogen on their own. The nutrient must first be converted into a usable form through a process called nitrogen fixation, which relies on microorganisms in the soil. This process takes place in natural ecosystems as well as on farmland. "While this process has been significantly overestimated in nature, it has increased by 75 percent over the past 20 years due to agriculture," says Bettina Weber, a biologist at the University of Graz, summarizing findings from a study published earlier this year.

Building on those results, a new analysis shows that the way nitrogen fixation is calculated in some Earth System models has now been reassessed. These models are widely used to project climate trends and inform major assessments, including the World Climate Report. The updated findings were published in the scientific journal PNAS.

New Findings Prompt Climate Model Revisions

The study was led by Sian Kou-Giesbrecht of Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Canada. The work was carried out by an international research group focused on biological nitrogen fixation, which includes Bettina Weber. This working group receives support from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) John Wesley Powell Centre for Analysis and Synthesis.

"We compared different Earth System models with current nitrogen fixation values and found that they overestimate the nitrogen fixation rate on natural surfaces by about 50 percent," Weber explains. Because plants depend on this process to access nitrogen, the overestimate has meaningful consequences. According to the study, it results in an overall reduction of about 11 percent in the projected CO2 fertilization effect.

Why Updating Models Is Critical

Weber emphasizes the importance of adjusting climate models to reflect these updated measurements. "This is because gases such as nitrogen oxides and nitrous oxide are produced as part of the nitrogen cycle. These can be released into the atmosphere through conversion processes and alter or disrupt climate processes." Accurately accounting for nitrogen dynamics, she says, is essential for making reliable predictions about how ecosystems and the climate will respond in the future.

sd
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jan, 2026 03:07 am
Following record years in 2023 and 2024, last year was also too warm. According to Copernicus, the critical threshold of 1.5 degrees will be reached a decade earlier than expected – despite the cooling effect of a climate phenomenon.

Copernicus: 2025 was the third hottest year on record
Quote:
Summary
Copernicus data show that 2025 was the third warmest year on record1, only marginally (0.01°C) cooler than 2023, and 0.13°C cooler than 2024 – the warmest year on record. The past 11 years have been the 11 warmest on record. Global temperatures from the past three years (2023-2025) averaged more than 1.5°C above the pre-industrial level (1850–1900). This marks the first time a three-year period has exceeded the 1.5°C limit. Air temperature over global land areas was second warmest, whilst the Antarctic saw its warmest annual temperature on record and the Arctic its 2nd warmest.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2026 03:52 am
With plans to sell off over a million acres of natural habitat for oil and gas development, the Trump administration is ignoring the dire impact on its fragile ecosystem.

What Trump’s plans for the Arctic mean for the global climate crisis
0 Replies
 
SpiritualSecession1
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2026 10:57 am
Where is the Politicians' outcry of the waste created by aluminum cans?

Where is the Politicians' outcry that clean water & electricity is not free?

Where is the Politicians' outcry that children & teens are addicted to drugs & video games?

#

"Let them eat cake!"

Cake = Politics

There has never been a democracy that was not rigged -ever!

Welcome to the USA: birthplace of democratic theory !
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2026 01:10 pm
It was a major success for the Obama administration to make progress on climate protection through the Clean Air Act. Other climate protection initiatives have repeatedly failed in Congress, and to this day there is no separate climate protection law in the United States. However, Congress no longer had to approve climate regulations under the Clean Air Act separately. Trump now wants to abolish this option. He announced this shortly after taking office a year ago, and the move had been long anticipated.

Quote:
The Environmental Protection Agency repealed the bedrock scientific finding that greenhouse gases threaten human life and well being. It means the agency can no longer regulate them.
Trump Administration Erases the Government’s Power to Fight Climate Change [NYT, no paywall]
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2026 07:25 pm
Point of no return: a hellish ‘hothouse Earth’ getting closer, scientists say

Continued global heating could set irreversible course by triggering climate tipping points, but most people unaware

Quote:
The world is closer than thought to a “point of no return” after which runaway global heating cannot be stopped, scientists have said.

Continued global heating could trigger climate tipping points, leading to a cascade of further tipping points and feedback loops, they said. This would lock the world into a new and hellish “hothouse Earth” climate far worse than the 2-3C temperature rise the world is on track to reach. The climate would also be very different to the benign conditions of the past 11,000 years, during which the whole of human civilisation developed.

At just 1.3C of global heating in recent years, extreme weather is already taking lives and destroying livelihoods across the globe. At 3-4C, “the economy and society will cease to function as we know it”, scientists said last week, but a hothouse Earth would be even more fiery.

The public and politicians were largely unaware of the risk of passing the point of no return, the researchers said. The group said they were issuing their warning because while rapid and immediate cuts to fossil fuel burning were challenging, reversing course was likely to be impossible once on the path to a hothouse Earth, even if emissions were eventually slashed.

It was difficult to predict when climate tipping points would be triggered, making precaution vital, said Dr Christopher Wolf, a scientist at Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Associates in the US. Wolf is a member of a study team that includes Prof Johan Rockström at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.

“Crossing even some of the thresholds could commit the planet to a hothouse trajectory,” said Wolf. “Policymakers and the public remain largely unaware of the risks posed by what would effectively be a point-of-no-return transition.

“It’s likely that global temperatures are [already] as warm as, or warmer than, at any point in the last 125,000 years and that climate change is advancing faster than many scientists predicted.”

It is also likely that carbon dioxide levels are the highest they have been in at least 2m years.

Prof Tim Lenton, an expert on tipping points at the University of Exeter in the UK, said: “We know we are running profound risks on the current climate trajectory, which we can’t rule out could turn into a trajectory towards a much less habitable state of the climate for us. However, we don’t need to be heading towards a hothouse Earth for there to be profound risks to humanity and our societies – these will already be upon us if we continue to 3C global warming.”

The assessment, which was published in the journal One Earth, synthesised recent scientific findings on climate feedback loops and 16 tipping elements. The tipping elements include the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, mountain glaciers, polar sea ice, sub-Arctic forests and permafrost, the Amazon rainforest and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (Amoc), a system of ocean currents that strongly influences the global climate.

Tipping may already be happening in Greenland and west Antarctica, with permafrost, mountain glaciers and the Amazon rainforest appearing to be on the verge, the scientists said.

“Research shows that several Earth system components may be closer to destabilising than once believed,” they concluded. “While the exact risk is uncertain, it is clear that current climate [action] commitments are insufficient.”

Prof William Ripple, at Oregon State University, US, who led the analysis, said: “The Amoc is already showing signs of weakening, and this could increase the risk of Amazon dieback. Carbon released by an Amazon dieback would further amplify global warming and interact with other feedback loops. We need to act quickly on our rapidly dwindling opportunities to prevent dangerous and unmanageable climate outcomes.”

Scientists warned in 2018 of the prospect of a hothouse Earth. In this scenario, global temperature stays significantly above the 4C rise of current worst-case climate scenarios for thousands of years, driving a huge rise in sea level that drowns coastal cities. The scientists said then that the “impacts of a hothouse Earth pathway on human societies would likely be massive, sometimes abrupt, and undoubtedly disruptive”.

guardian
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 08:24 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Trump's tariffs alone are lulling US industry into a false sense of security, suggesting that international competition is a thing of the past. With regulations being lifted, there is no longer any pressure on them to continue developing resource-saving technologies. The American president is steering his industry into a museum, in keeping with his obsession with the past.

I think you Americans should ask yourselves whether this was perhaps a betrayal of your own country, and not just in economic terms: when wildfires rage in California, hurricanes wipe out half of cities, or droughts destroy crops in the Midwest. Donald Trump is working really hard to make sure that the future is worse than the past.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 12:06 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

It was a major success for the Obama administration to make progress on climate protection through the Clean Air Act. Other climate protection initiatives have repeatedly failed in Congress, and to this day there is no separate climate protection law in the United States. However, Congress no longer had to approve climate regulations under the Clean Air Act separately. Trump now wants to abolish this option. He announced this shortly after taking office a year ago, and the move had been long anticipated.

Quote:
The Environmental Protection Agency repealed the bedrock scientific finding that greenhouse gases threaten human life and well being. It means the agency can no longer regulate them.
Trump Administration Erases the Government’s Power to Fight Climate Change [NYT, no paywall]


I guess most people will focus on the fact that America is no longer accepting science driven warnings.

I, personally, am more disturbed by the fact that enough of us voted to return Trump to office even though there were indications he would head in this direction.

Not sure what is going on with us, but everyone else on the planet better put some thought into how to handle our...ummm...devolution.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 12:07 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
There's a pretty large number of powerful people who have questioned man-made climate change and fought to prevent governments from recognizing – and acting on – its threats to the world economy. But these people have always been around and have grudgingly accepted our collective right to clean air and fresh water as long as they ca continue to make money. No, by far, the most ecologically destructive human beings who ever lived, waging war on nature and celebrating petrochemical pollution, are now in control of the government of the USA. Add up all of Trump's replacement bureaucrats, the Republicans in congress, and the right-wing jurists and you probably have less than a few thousand individuals – and they're all following Trump's orders as thought up by an even smaller number of trolls, guys like Miller, Vought, and Musk. We don't know if they can be stopped in the courts. And if the administration's attempts at voter intimidation are even partially successful we may not even be able to stop them at the ballot box. It's too bad the electorate never gets the chance to cast an up or down vote on environmental protection. But I guess the threat posed by gay-friendly kids' books in public libraries really should take priority.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 01:03 pm
@hightor,
With the repeal of the Endangerment Finding, the legal foundation of numerous environmental regulations is being shaken.

This is viewed favourably even outside the United States: here in Germany, at least in parts of industry, there is applause for it. And our Chancellor also believes that climate policy puts us at a disadvantage in international competition.

hightor wrote:
But I guess the threat posed by gay-friendly kids' books in public libraries really should take priority.
Italy’s state broadcaster, Rai, used an image of Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man with the genitals missing in the opening credits for its Winter Olympics coverage. One should also chop off the genitals and breasts of statues!
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 02:38 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Six possible effects of Trump's climate policy change [BBC]
Quote:
[...]
Fewer greenhouse gas emissions restrictions
[...]
Cheaper cars in the US (but they'll be harder to export)
[...]
Nuisance lawsuits
[...]
Public health
[...]
Falling behind in the global renewables race
[...]
Less industry regulation
[...]

Even if the next president were a Democrat with a heart for the environment, he would find it difficult to reintroduce these regulations. Without the ‘endangerment finding,’ future governments would in many cases lack the legal basis for climate protection measures.

Environmental organisations have announced their opposition to Trump's decision.
‘We will take the fight to the courts,’ says Manish Bapna, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, ‘and we will win.’
That is doubtful. The Supreme Court, which ruled in favour of climate protection in 2007, is now known to have a different composition.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2026 06:33 am
According to a study, frogs adapt their croaking to the weather: the warmer it gets, the faster they sing. When temperatures rise earlier in the year, this has audible consequences.

This could revolutionise research into phenological responses to climate change.
Male frogs may unconsciously send out signals about the suitability of environmental conditions for reproduction, and females interpret these signals beyond the males' intentions.

Anuran call properties as reliable indicators of environmental suitability for reproduction
Quote:
Abstract

The onset of animal breeding activity is often accompanied by auditory signals, typically produced by males, that indicate reproductive status to potential mates and competitors. Here, using male anuran advertisement calls as a case study, we present the novel hypothesis that characteristics of ectotherm auditory signals that are modulated by temperature may also serve as bioclimatic indicators of the suitability of proximal abiotic conditions for reproduction. According to this hypothesis, thermal constraints on signal characteristics, such as call rate and duration, may facilitate tracking of environmental conditions by females. Through integrative analysis of empirical ecological studies, we demonstrate how variation in call properties may influence female reproductive physiology and behavior. We then outline how this proposed mechanism may enable environmental tracking and phenological shifts with climate change, provide guidelines for experimentally testing this hypothesis, and discuss applications of findings from this research to conservation management for species of concern.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Feb, 2026 07:19 am
In the important coffee-growing countries, it is much hotter for coffee plants than it used to be. The quantity and quality of the harvest are declining, while prices are rising.

According to an analysis by the independent research group Climate Central, 25 countries that produce almost all the world's coffee experienced 47 days more of coffee-harming heat on average between 2021 and 2025.

The five countries that account for 75% of global coffee production — Brazil, Vietnam, Ethiopia and Indonesia — saw 57 more days of such temperatures in the same period.

Climate Central said a recent surge in coffee prices around the world was "at least partly" caused by extreme weather in coffee-growing regions, with US tariffs on imports from Brazil, however, also playing a role.

More Coffee-Harming Heat Due to Carbon Pollution
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Feb, 2026 10:34 am
By repealing the EPA’s determination that greenhouse gases threaten public health, the president is denying reality itself

Trump has done more than harm the government’s ability to fight global heating
Quote:
The climate crisis is killing people. These deaths are measurable, documented and ongoing. Concluding otherwise is just playing pretend. Studies explain the mechanics, but lived experience supplies the truth. The people who suffer the consequences see the fire rising and water closing in. They need their government’s help.

Despite that, the president of the United States stood at a microphone last Thursday and abdicated his duty to them. “It has nothing to do with public health,” he claimed about the climate crisis while announcing that the federal government would repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s “endangerment finding”, a determination that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare. “This is all a scam, a giant scam.”

What he was lying about is a truth the federal government – even under his first administration – has embraced for nearly two decades. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the “endangerment finding” in 2009. Drawing upon extensive scientific evidence, the EPA concluded that emissions driving the climate crisis contribute to extreme heat, intensified storms, rising sea levels, wildfires and degraded air quality, all of which carry direct consequences for human life and safety.

The endangerment finding was not rhetorical flourish. It was the legal keystone of modern US climate regulation, the scientific and administrative determination that enabled the federal government to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. It formed the basis for emissions standards governing vehicles, power plants and industry.

Erase that finding, and you do more than undermine the Clean Air Act and the regulatory framework it supports. The move dismantles the authority that made those protections possible in the first place. In the process, the president is withdrawing official recognition of a danger millions of Americans are already living through.

This is on brand. Trump is wont to redefine documented facts, definitions and knowledge until it bears no resemblance to reality. When confronted with his own electoral defeat, he reframes it as fraud and uses government power to buttress that con. When addressing racism, he and his acolytes falsely and exclusively reframe it as discrimination against white Americans. The Trump White House doesn’t so much contest facts as it attempts to erase them.

Now, confronted with a warming planet, the Trump administration is risking something even more consequential: redefining and exacerbating an existing danger to his constituents. Across the country, people are confronting the climate crisis not as a projection but as past and present conditions – living on top of toxic fracking sites, smoke-choked skies and strained power grids.

The climate crisis is not a forecast. It is an incident report. It long ago moved beyond the theoretical, and its harms do not fall evenly.

Black Americans, for example, are more likely to live near polluting infrastructure and suffer disproportionate exposure to toxic air. They experience higher rates of premature death tied to pollution-related illness. Environmental justice advocates warn that dismantling the endangerment finding removes one of the federal government’s last legal shields against these harms – leaving frontline communities more exposed as climate risks intensify.

That vulnerability extends beyond chronic pollution exposure to acute disaster impact. The Eaton fire in California – which destroyed more than 16,000 structures – underscores how climate-intensified catastrophes often fall hardest on communities with the least infrastructure, insurance coverage and political leverage to recover.

There is also a strategic irony embedded in Trump’s latest retreat. In refusing to fight the climate crisis, the administration risks undermining the nationalist politics it claims to champion.

The climate crisis does not stop at national borders. Drought, crop failure and rising seas are already displacing populations abroad, fueling migration flows wealthier nations struggle to absorb. Weakening climate mitigation while simultaneously hardening borders ignores the causal chain connecting the two – a posture that risks intensifying the very displacement pressures it claims to resist.

Racism may color Trump’s politics, but it is probably not the sole driver here. The economic incentives are clear: erasing the finding would benefit polluters and the oligarchs behind them. The administration’s retreat from climate responsibility is hardly passive. As it works to erase the scientific finding that allows the federal government to regulate greenhouse gases, it is simultaneously directing the Pentagon to purchase coal-fired power – using federal muscle to sustain the very industry fueling planetary warming. It is one thing to deny a crisis. It is another to help finance it.

What Trump’s decision most clearly reflects, however, is a governing pattern the president has exhibited for years: distancing himself from responsibility for the harm he commits, even when the consequences are measurable and grave.

Recognition of danger undergirds our laws, enabling enforcement and creating the possibility of accountability. In the absence of findings like the EPA’s 2009 report, the government’s response to climate harm would rest largely on moral duty rather than enforceable obligation – a posture far more vulnerable to political discretion. Without formal recognition of danger, citizens and states lose one of their strongest legal footholds for compelling federal action when disaster strikes.

Should this erasure stand up after the inevitable court challenges, the government’s declared obligation to confront those realities with the full weight of its authority would disappear. The harm would not disappear, however. The only thing that changes is the terrain on which citizens can demand protection. The fires still burn. The heat still kills. The floods still come.

When someone like Trump rescinds the recognition of a documented danger already harming the people he’s charged with serving, it is not a mere change of policy. The president is refusing to do his job.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Feb, 2026 10:39 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Across the country, Democratic-led states are accelerating their initiatives to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Their role just became much more important.

As Trump Obliterates Climate Efforts, States Try to Fill the Gap NYT, without paywall]
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2026 06:02 am
Water ‘Bankruptcy’ Era Has Begun for Billions, Scientists Say

Stress and scarcity aren’t strong enough terms to capture the water crisis facing much of the world, according to a new UN report.

https://d74399a30jvkp5.archive.is/XpRIS/bf336a16d528186fa74d8e4cc1b450ab2d36ab27.webp
The Jaguari-Jacarei dam during a drought in Joanopolis, Sao Paulo state, Brazil, on Dec. 12.

Quote:

• A new United Nations report says humans have depleted freshwater systems to the point they can’t recover, marking a new era of “global water bankruptcy”.

• The report finds that three-quarters of the world’s population lives in countries where freshwater supplies are insecure or critically insecure, and four billion people face severe water scarcity for at least one month a year.

• Chronic overuse of groundwater, forest destruction, land degradation, and pollution have caused irreversible freshwater loss in many parts of the world, problems that are compounded by climate change.

A new era has begun of “global water bankruptcy,” with humans depleting freshwater systems to the point they can’t recover, according to a new United Nations report.

Three-quarters of the world’s population — about 6.1 billion people — now live in countries where freshwater supplies are insecure or critically insecure, according to the report, published Tuesday by UN University’s Institute for Water, Environment and Health. Four billion people face severe water scarcity for at least one month a year.

Cities are experiencing more Day Zero events in which municipal water systems near collapse. An acute water shortage in Tehran recently led Iran’s president to warn it may become necessary to evacuate parts of the city or even relocate the capital. In Turkey, roughly 700 sinkholes — some up to 100 feet deep — have appeared where aquifers have collapsed after their groundwater was drained.

Drought and water scarcity are likely to drive migrations in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America, says the report, which is based on a peer-reviewed paper.

Global warming is increasing water demands and makes the natural supply of water less predictable. But water management is also a key part of the equation, said Kaveh Madani, director of the UN institute and the lead author of the report. “Water bankruptcy is not about how much water you have; it’s about how you manage your water,” he said.

Chronic overuse of groundwater, forest destruction, land degradation and pollution have caused irreversible freshwater loss in many parts of the world — problems that are compounded by climate change.

Climate change is shifting fresh water on a planetary scale and, on a smaller scale, those effects can be made worse by local actions. A hotter, drier planet experiences more water-evaporating droughts. That concentrates salts in the soil, as so do certain farming practices. Higher temperatures contribute to more forest and peatland fires, while human clear-cutting and draining of wetlands worsen fire conditions.

“Droughts are no longer just natural but anthropogenic — meaning that we have climate change at the global level, and then also the land use changes from management decisions, infrastructure allocation decisions, make water less and less available,” Madani said.

Use of the word “bankruptcy” to describe the extent of water depletion is new for the UN. Previously, UN University scientists used “water stress” or “water crisis” to describe systems that were under either prolonged, or sudden and acute, pressure. Both of those terms allow for the possibility of recovery.

But that isn’t feasible in many areas where humans have overdrawn the local supply of fresh water, squandering the annual influx from recharging sources like rivers and melting snow while exhausting groundwater and other natural reservoirs.

Half the world gets its domestic water from stored groundwater, which is being heavily depleted. But those reliant on water above the surface are also vulnerable. A quarter of the population depends on large lakes that have lost half their water since the early 1990s.

The amount of water available to communities is also often overstated because
its quality may be too poor for use, the report says. Fertilizers, mining effluents, plastics and drug contaminants continue to find their way into rivers, lakes and coastal waters around the world, and wastewater treatment practices are often inadequate.

https://d74399a30jvkp5.archive.is/XpRIS/df47b4b88d23e342b0e492d61b82e1fe51653700.webp
A man wades in stagnant water in a dried-up river bed in central Hilla city, Iraq, in July.

The report calls for the recognition of water bankruptcy in policy debates, and for the creation of a global monitoring framework to track water resources. Governments should consider blocking projects that further degrade water supplies, it says.

“Even in years that are wet, we are still struggling,” Madani said. “A lot of these systems have been damaged permanently.”

Another paper published this month, in Nature, predicted that crop droughts will worsen in much of Europe, northern South America and western North America even as big rain events increase. That’s because rising temperatures more strongly affect evaporation and loss of soil moisture in those regions, which means more water will be required for irrigation.

In the tropics, semi-arid areas are more affected by precipitation than by temperature-driven evaporation. On the other hand, they may also experience more extreme heat, which makes plants thirstier, or extreme rainfall that erodes soil.

“Even if, in agriculture, you’re not being affected by more of these very dramatic seasonal droughts, you still are affected by increases in extreme weather,” said Emily Black, a professor of terrestrial processes and climate at the University of Reading and lead author of the Nature study. “Agriculture is a big user of water, so if we are increasing the water demand from plants, then that of course strains water supply wherever you are.”

The UN report’s release comes ahead of meetings in Dakar, Senegal, later this month to lay groundwork for the 2026 UN Water Conference in December. On Jan. 7 the US said it would withdraw from UN Water and UN Universities, along with dozens of other international organizations that the Trump administration said are “contrary to the interests” of the country. The US decision has not impacted operations so far, Madani said, though he added that the country’s absence will be felt in Dakar.

source
jespah
 
  2  
Reply Fri 20 Feb, 2026 03:37 pm
@hightor,
Let's not forget AI is turning out to be a huge consumer of water: https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption

But who cares about thirsty children when you need a sloppy Studio Ghibli ripoff image of your cat?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2026 01:43 pm
For the millions of people across the United States who have spent the last month digging themselves out of above-average levels of snow and ice, this winter has felt especially long and harsh. But the typical winter is actually getting shorter in 80% of major US cities scrutinized by researchers, according to new data released by Climate Central, an independent climate science and communication group.

Researchers found that across 195 US cities, winters are on average nine days shorter today than they were from 1970 to 1997, as the climate crisis progresses.

Shorter Winters in 195 U.S. Cities
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Mar, 2026 05:39 am
Climate change is raising global average temperatures, and heat waves are becoming more frequent. To protect themselves from extreme temperatures, more people are using air conditioning in their homes. More offices, factory buildings and workshops are also being equipped with air conditioning systems.

However, the high energy consumption of air conditioning systems could further accelerate climate change, writes a research group led by Yuli Shan from the University of Birmingham in the journal Nature Communications.

Rising Air-Conditioning Use Intensifies Global Warming
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 03/11/2026 at 02:48:52