Over on the Obama thread, there has been some discussion of Barack Obama's energy policies. These are pertinent for this thread as he, the presumptive Democratic nominee for 2008, could be President for the next four years and could be pushing such proposals:
SOME BARACK OBAMA ENERGY PROPOSALS:
Senator Obama. . .
--Calls for cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Would accomplish this through a cap-and-trade system that would auction off 100 percent of emissions permits, making polluters pay for the CO2 they emit.
--Would channel revenue raised from auctioning emissions permits -- between $30 billion and $50 billion a year -- toward developing and deploying clean energy technology, creating "green jobs," and helping low-income Americans afford higher energy bills.
--Calls for 25 percent of U.S. electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025, and for 30 percent of the federal government's electricity to come from renewables by 2020.
--Proposes investing $150 billion over 10 years in R&D for renewables, biofuels, efficiency, "clean coal," and other clean tech.
--Calls for improving energy efficiency in the U.S. 50 percent by 2030.
--Calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2022 and 60 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2030.
--Calls for all new buildings in the U.S. to be carbon neutral by 2030.
--Calls for reducing U.S. oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels a day, by 2030.
--Introduced the Health Care for Hybrids Act, which would have the federal government help cover health-care costs for retired U.S. autoworkers in exchange for domestic auto companies investing at least 50 percent of the savings into production of more fuel-efficient vehicles.
--Supports raising fuel-economy standards for automobiles to 40 miles per gallon and light trucks to 32 mpg by 2020.
--Supports a phaseout of incandescent light bulbs by 2014.
--Cosponsor of the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act. After being badgered by MoveOn and other progressives over the issue, he "clarified" his position by saying he would support liquefied coal only if it emitted 20 percent less carbon over its lifecycle than conventional fuels.
An ambitious agenda for sure and there are some things with which I think most of us can agree and some other things that I think bear careful scrutiny before we buy into them.
LINK