71
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 May, 2007 05:46 pm
here is an interesting point of view on global warming expressed by some retired U.S. generals .
retired marine corps general zinni - who is well-known for speaking his mind - says :
"We can pay with money now or with lives later " !

it certainly provides a unique view of the dangers that may be brought on or increased by the results of global warming .
hbg


Quote:

Ex-generals: Global warming threatens U.S. security
------------------------------------------------------------

Story Highlights•
Report predicts wars over water, hunger, displacement in the next 30-40 years
• "Climate change exacerbates already unstable situations," one author says
• Gen. Zinni: We can pay with money now or with lives later to address problems

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Global warming poses a "serious threat to America's national security" and the U.S. likely will be dragged into fights over water and other shortages, top retired military leaders warn in a new report.

The report says that in the next 30 to 40 years there will be wars over water, increased hunger instability from worsening disease and rising sea levels and global warming-induced refugees. "The chaos that results can be an incubator of civil strife, genocide and the growth of terrorism," the 35-page report predicts.

"Climate change exacerbates already unstable situations," former U.S. Army chief of staff Gordon Sullivan told Associated Press Radio. "Everybody needs to start paying attention to what's going on. I don't think this is a particularly hard sell in the Pentagon. ... We're paying attention to what those security implications are."

Gen. Anthony "Tony" Zinni, President Bush's former Middle East envoy, says in the report: "It's not hard to make the connection between climate change and instability, or climate change and terrorism."

The report was issued by the Alexandria, Virginia-based, national security think-tank The CNA Corporation and was written by six retired admirals and five retired generals. They warn of a future of rampant disease, water shortages and flooding that will make already dicey areas -- such as the Middle East, Asia and Africa -- even worse.

"Weakened and failing governments, with an already thin margin for survival, foster the conditions for internal conflicts, extremism and movement toward increased authoritarianism and radical ideologies," the report says. "The U.S. will be drawn more frequently into these situations."

Joining calls already made by scientists and environmental activists, the retired U.S. military leaders call on the U.S. government to make major cuts in emissions of gases that cause global warming.

The Bush administration has declined mandatory emission cuts in favor of voluntary methods. Other nations have committed to required reductions that kick in within a few years.

"We will pay for this one way or another," writes Zinni, former commander of U.S. Central Command. "We will pay to reduce greenhouse gas emissions today, and we'll have to take an economic hit of some kind. Or we will pay the price later in military terms. And that will involve human lives. There will be a human toll."

Top climate scientists said the report makes sense and increased national security risk is a legitimate global warming side-effect.

The report is "pretty impressive," but may be too alarmist because it may take longer than 30 years for some of these things to happen, said Stanford scientist Terry Root, a co-author of this month's international scientific report on the effects of global warming on life on Earth.

But the instability will happen sometime, Root agreed.

"We're going to have a war over water," Root said. "There's just not going to be enough water around for us to have for us to need to live with and to provide for the natural environment."

University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver said the military officers were smart to highlight the issue of refugees who flee unstable areas because of global warming.

"There will be tens of millions of people migrating, where are we going to put them?" Weaver said.

Weaver said that over the past years, scientists, who by nature are cautious, have been attacked by conservative activists when warning about climate change. This shows that it's not a liberal-conservative issue, Weaver said.



source :
UNITED STATES GENERALS SPEAK UP ON GLOBAL WARMING !
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 06:22 am
http://i13.tinypic.com/661h9o5.jpg
source: Detoit News

Why can such be done by other car manufactorers in other countries without increasing the prices?



http://i16.tinypic.com/54ba5u1.jpg
source: Chicago Tribune, 08.05.07, page 4
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 07:19 am
My last Subaru retailed for $13k plus. My next one if I get the cheapest model will be close to $20k or more.

I can't buy a BMW or Kia or Nissan or Toyota or Opal or Saab or Mercedes or Volvo or Jaguar or Austin Healy or VW or any other European or Asian made automobile for less money this year than it cost last year or five years ago or ten years ago.

So where again are these cars offering better gas mileage that don't cost more?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 07:24 am
Interesting that the Queen told G W Bush that climate change was a big problem. The President responded with a knowing wink, as if he had a plan.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 07:38 am
Foxfyre wrote:

So where again are these cars offering better gas mileage that don't cost more?


No idea.
I just and only wanted to point to the sentence that the "big three" said, they couldn't raise fuel economy without increasing car prices.

And I think, other manufacturers could do it years ago.

But I agree that $20k for a decent new car is an unbeatable price. (here, in Germany that is. But on the other hand - German-made cars are sold up to 20% cheaper in the USA than here)
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 07:48 am
The so-called environmentally friendly hybrids here are definitely more expensive than their all internal combustion engine brethren. And yes, some of the more fuel efficient cars are less expensive than other cars but they are invariably smaller, underpowered, and more dangerous to drive than larger cars. Also, there is no fuel efficiency when you have to take two fuel efficient cars because everybody can't fit into one.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:14 am
Yes, that's your argument.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:20 am
Also anybody else's argument who bases their argument on realities rather than kneejerk emotional wishfulness.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:23 am
Anybody's in the USA that should be.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:44 am
Hamburger writes
Quote:
here is an interesting point of view on global warming expressed by some retired U.S. generals .
retired marine corps general zinni - who is well-known for speaking his mind - says :
"We can pay with money now or with lives later " !


So then, we should add a few military types and envoys along with Queen Elizabeth and George W. Bush as experts on climatology? I'm REALLY going to have to think long and hard about that.

The simple comment of one of those bozos claiming that climate change and terrorism are related was enough for me to know that this is much ado about pretty much nothing.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:49 am
Foxfyre wrote:
Hamburger writes
Quote:
here is an interesting point of view on global warming expressed by some retired U.S. generals .
retired marine corps general zinni - who is well-known for speaking his mind - says :
"We can pay with money now or with lives later " !


So then, we should add a few military types and envoys along with Queen Elizabeth and George W. Bush as experts on climatology? I'm REALLY going to have to think long and hard about that.

The simple comment of one of those bozos claiming that climate change and terrorism are related was enough for me to know that this is much ado about pretty much nothing.
and long may you continue in your state of blissful ignorance.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:51 am
Steve 41oo wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Hamburger writes
Quote:
here is an interesting point of view on global warming expressed by some retired U.S. generals .
retired marine corps general zinni - who is well-known for speaking his mind - says :
"We can pay with money now or with lives later " !


So then, we should add a few military types and envoys along with Queen Elizabeth and George W. Bush as experts on climatology? I'm REALLY going to have to think long and hard about that.

The simple comment of one of those bozos claiming that climate change and terrorism are related was enough for me to know that this is much ado about pretty much nothing.
and long may you continue in your state of blissful ignorance.


Well on the bright side, you're giving our President credit for being brilliant about something. Smile
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 11:50 am
foxfire wrote :

Quote:
So then, we should add a few military types and envoys along with Queen Elizabeth and George W. Bush as experts on climatology? I'm REALLY going to have to think long and hard about that.


well , i sure hope some scientists will come around and see foxfire's point of view .
and if they can't accept foxfire's point of view they must be totally unqualified .

(i really wonder why it is so difficult to accept that wasting the resources of mother earth isn't a very smart thing to do - it really puzzles me !

i guess it is somewhat like the "big 3" almost always claiming that whatever makes sense - seatbelts , airbags , lower fuel consumption ... you name it ... , can't be done . of course , they will come aboard at some point and suddenly claim credit for it . all one has to do is watch the latest ads touting safety featuress that at one time they fought against tooth and nail ... and so it goes on .)
hbg
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 12:55 pm
I don't think that anyone wants to waste rsources or unnecessarily damage the environment. That there has been a degree of warming going on in the past two decades is undisputed - just as is the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the possibility that this could be a contributor to the observed changes.

The issue here is the, relative to other hazards, significance of this issue and the theory behind it, as well as the relationship of the supposed hazard to the costs (both economic and in terms of the loss of human freedom) associated with the proposed remedies.

The doomsday scenarios put forward by many AGW zealots are highly suspect, as are their estimates of the costs (both economic and in terms of human freedom) associated with their proposed remedies. Too often their response to criticism relative to these specific issues is to portray their critics as deniers of the undisputed elements of the situation. That is a distortion of the truth and an evasion of the central issue on the part of the AGW zealots.

In addition, there is an element among them who appear to be, at least partly, motivated by a view of humanity as some form of contagion on an otherwise benign earth. This is a viewpoint profoundly at odds with the fundamental precepts of our culture, civilization, and political philosophy. That alone does not make this idea wrong. However, we should recognize it for what it is and what are the many other logical consequences of this radical idea.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 01:05 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
... That there has been a degree of warming going on in the past two decades is undisputed - just as is the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations and the possibility that this could be a contributor to the observed changes.
1. The "degree" of warming is unprecedented2.As is the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration. 3.The science is done... the "possibility" is reduced to almost zero.."could be a contributor" should read "is the major cause of anthropogenic global warming".

I admire your efforts to deny the tide the right to come in George. But King Canute still got wet.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 01:10 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:

I admire your efforts to deny the tide the right to come in George.


Just in cas you really do that, George:

http://i16.tinypic.com/637ppwx.jpg

:wink:
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 01:15 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:
1. The "degree" of warming is unprecedented2.As is the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration. 3.The science is done... the "possibility" is reduced to almost zero.."could be a contributor" should read "is the major cause of anthropogenic global warming".

I admire your efforts to deny the tide the right to come in George. But King Canute still got wet.


Neither the degree of warming nor the CO2 concentrations are "unprecedented". Both have been exceeded in the earth's past as is confirmed in the geological record.

The science continues -- it is hardly "done" -- at least as seen by minds that are not already closed.

The possibility of exactly what is "almost zero"?? Catastrophe or continued slight warming. That is the essential question.

It is you, not me, who has a closed mind on this matter.
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 02:22 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Steve 41oo wrote:

I admire your efforts to deny the tide the right to come in George.


Just in cas you really do that, George:

http://i16.tinypic.com/637ppwx.jpg

:wink:

Negative tidal coefficient (at Wed 17:31) ??? Shocked
This must be at a weird location.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 02:27 pm
miniTAX wrote:
Negative tidal coefficient (at Wed 17:31) ??? Shocked
This must be at a weird location.


Actually the data of January - I've copied that that without looking for the month.

Yes, weird - otherwise George wouldn't live around there.
(Though low tide lower than usually - and normally - happens at various places - that's called 'spring tide': the tidal effect of the sun and the moon acting in concert twice a month, when the sun, earth and moon are all in a straight line (full moon or new moon). The range of tide is larger than average.)
0 Replies
 
miniTAX
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 02:34 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

So where again are these cars offering better gas mileage that don't cost more?


No idea.
I just and only wanted to point to the sentence that the "big three" said, they couldn't raise fuel economy without increasing car prices.
Hillary Clinton has pledged to reduce food daily intake by each american adult by 100 kcal each year and received all the same a cool response, not only from the "big three". So her scientific advisers are now devising new plans to combat GHG Global Warming by reducing beans usage. Forget chili con carne if she is to be elected Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 09/23/2024 at 10:29:06