72
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jan, 2025 07:12 am
Oceans can store a lot of energy from the atmosphere, but the warmer they are, the more they contribute to weather extremes.
In 2024, the oceans have warmed further and are now hotter than they have ever been since humans have been recording these temperatures. And this applies not only to the surface, but also to the upper 2000 metres.

Record High Temperatures in the Ocean in 2024
Quote:
Abstract

Heating in the ocean has continued in 2024 in response to increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, despite the transition from an El Niño to neutral conditions. In 2024, both global sea surface temperature (SST) and upper 2000 m ocean heat content (OHC) reached unprecedented highs in the historical record. The 0–2000 m OHC in 2024 exceeded that of 2023 by 16 ± 8 ZJ (1 Zetta Joules = 1021 Joules, with a 95% confidence interval) (IAP/CAS data), which is confirmed by two other data products: 18 ± 7 ZJ (CIGAR-RT reanalysis data) and 40 ± 31 ZJ (Copernicus Marine data, updated to November 2024). The Indian Ocean, tropical Atlantic, Mediterranean Sea, North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern Ocean also experienced record-high OHC values in 2024. The global SST continued its record-high values from 2023 into the first half of 2024, and declined slightly in the second half of 2024, resulting in an annual mean of 0.61°C ± 0.02°C (IAP/CAS data) above the 1981–2010 baseline, slightly higher than the 2023 annual-mean value (by 0.07°C ± 0.02°C for IAP/CAS, 0.05°C ± 0.02°C for NOAA/NCEI, and 0.06°C ± 0.11°C for Copernicus Marine). The record-high values of 2024 SST and OHC continue to indicate unabated trends of global heating.


0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Jan, 2025 08:09 am
Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere reached a new high last year. as satellite measurements by the British weather service show.

Rise in carbon dioxide off track for limiting global warming to 1.5°C
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2025 03:05 am
Rising temperatures are jeopardising the habitat of up to three million people in the Arctic. Inhabitants of Greenland, the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, northern Canada and Russia are already struggling with the thawing of permafrost soils, according to a recent study published in the journal ‘Communications Earth and Environment’.

A transdisciplinary, comparative analysis reveals key risks from Arctic permafrost thaw
Quote:
Abstract

Permafrost thaw poses diverse risks to Arctic environments and livelihoods. Understanding the effects of permafrost thaw is vital for informed policymaking and adaptation efforts. Here, we present the consolidated findings of a risk analysis spanning four study regions: Longyearbyen (Svalbard, Norway), the Avannaata municipality (Greenland), the Beaufort Sea region and the Mackenzie River Delta (Canada) and the Bulunskiy District of the Sakha Republic (Russia). Local stakeholders’ and scientists’ perceptions shaped our understanding of the risks as dynamic, socionatural phenomena involving physical processes, key hazards, and societal consequences. Through an inter- and transdisciplinary risk analysis based on multidirectional knowledge exchanges and thematic network analysis, we identified five key hazards of permafrost thaw. These include infrastructure failure, disruption of mobility and supplies, decreased water quality, challenges for food security, and exposure to diseases and contaminants. The study’s novelty resides in the comparative approach spanning different disciplines, environmental and societal contexts, and the transdisciplinary synthesis considering various risk perceptions.


roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2025 03:45 am
@Walter Hinteler,
The saving grace it that I am 80 years old, and you struck me as being about the same the same.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Wed 22 Jan, 2025 06:54 am
Stricter measures for more climate protection are unfeasible, says the Dutch government. This is also due to a farmers' party in the governing coalition.
Dutch judges do not want to accept this.

Farmers in the Netherlands are powerful. The populist farmers' protest party, BBB, is part of the coalition government. It vehemently rejects regulatory intervention.

However, Dutch farmers are now threatened with stricter environmental regulations. A court judgement stipulates much stricter nature conservation measures. Civil court judges in The Hague ruled that the state is doing far too little to combat the damage to nature caused by nitrogen emissions, particularly from agriculture. The court upheld a complaint by the environmental organisation Greenpeace.

The government must now ensure that harmful emissions of nitrogen compounds in nature reserves are reduced by at least 50 per cent by the end of 2030. The judgement could have major consequences for intensive livestock farming. The measures taken so far have been insufficient. In addition, a previously adopted nitrogen reduction programme has been cancelled. To date, no new measures have been enacted, the judges stated.

Both parties can appeal against the judgement, but the judge ruled that the government must already start implementing the judgement.

Greenpeace wint zaak tegen Staat, rechter dwingt kabinet meer haast te maken met stikstofaanpak
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 22 Jan, 2025 09:20 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Civil court judges in The Hague ruled that the state is doing far too little to combat the damage to nature caused by nitrogen emissions, particularly from agriculture.

All the farmers have to do is present evidence that this damage to nature is insignificant, if not illusory, and doesn't represent a threat to humans or wildlife.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Wed 22 Jan, 2025 09:46 am
@hightor,
What is striking in this case is that Greenpeace did not use a specific case for this lawsuit, as is usually the case. No, the environmental organisation challenged the entire Dutch nitrogen policy in court. Greenpeace wanted the government to at least comply with its own nitrogen regulations.

‘The court agrees with Greenpeace that the state is acting unlawfully if it does not stop the degradation of nitrogen-sensitive nature,’ the judgement states [as reported by Dutch media]. ‘The government is to blame for this', the court ruled.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 23 Jan, 2025 12:41 pm
A landmark bill that would make the UK’s climate and environment targets legally binding seems doomed after government whips ordered Labour MPs to oppose it following a breakdown in negotiations. The Guardian
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 10:52 am
Climate change ("global warming") is also a threat to health.
According to a recent study, the lives of millions of people in Europe are at risk. Southern Europe in particular would be affected.

Higher temperatures, longer and more intense heatwaves with nights that barely cool down - advancing climate change is threatening the health of millions of people. It is difficult to analyse how many people will die prematurely as a result of rising temperatures because countless factors are relevant. Nevertheless, one research team has given it a try.

Estimating future heat-related and cold-related mortality under climate change, demographic and adaptation scenarios in 854 European cities
Quote:
Abstract

Previous health impact assessments of temperature-related mortality in Europe indicated that the mortality burden attributable to cold is much larger than for heat. Questions remain as to whether climate change can result in a net decrease in temperature-related mortality. In this study, we estimated how climate change could affect future heat-related and cold-related mortality in 854 European urban areas, under several climate, demographic and adaptation scenarios. We showed that, with no adaptation to heat, the increase in heat-related deaths consistently exceeds any decrease in cold-related deaths across all considered scenarios in Europe. Under the lowest mitigation and adaptation scenario (SSP3-7.0), we estimate a net death burden due to climate change increasing by 49.9% and cumulating 2,345,410 (95% confidence interval = 327,603 to 4,775,853) climate change-related deaths between 2015 and 2099. This net effect would remain positive even under high adaptation scenarios, whereby a risk attenuation of 50% is still insufficient to reverse the trend under SSP3-7.0. Regional differences suggest a slight net decrease of death rates in Northern European countries but high vulnerability of the Mediterranean region and Eastern Europe areas. Unless strong mitigation and adaptation measures are implemented, most European cities should experience an increase of their temperature-related mortality burden.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2025 12:48 pm
Several environmental NGOs could be effectively shut down in Europe, if a defunding push by rightwing MEPs is successful, campaigners say.

At the same time that centre and far right MEPs are revving up strategies to defang, deregulate or decapitate the European Green Deal, an EU plan to cut emissions to net zero by 2050, a proposed funding freeze in the European Parliament would weaken green groups.

Rightwing MEPs threaten huge funding freeze for environmental NGOs
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2025 07:44 pm
I'm listening to a Renew Economy podcast with guest Roberta Boscolo from the WMO.
They're talking about ocean warming and it's not good - so many potential impacts that, even reaching net zero, will take a long time to return to what where used to. The oceans are a climate slow motion juggernaut and have a huge heat capacitance. The bit about the impact on deep sea currents and the different things that means for the USA East coast vs Europe's West coast. And that everything points to a slow rise of sea levels to 2 metres - even if we net zeroed right now.

https://reneweconomy.com.au/energy-insiders-podcast-i-dont-know-if-we-can-adapt/

So I'm moving to the tablelands.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2025 03:14 am
@hingehead,
‘Backsliding’: most countries to miss vital climate deadline as Cop30 nears
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 10 Feb, 2025 08:04 am
@Walter Hinteler,
The parties to the Paris Climate Agreement had until 10 February to set out their path to reducing emissions by 2035. Only a few have delivered, including the USA - which, according to Trump, wants to pull out anyway.

According to "Carbon Brief", only ten of the 195 parties have recently submitted current NDCs: Andorra, Brazil, Ecuador, New Zealand, Switzerland, St Lucia, Uruguay, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Analysis: 95% of countries miss UN deadline to submit 2035 climate pledges
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 02/22/2025 at 02:25:46