@Glennn,
Quote:And you're right. I don't know the reason why some people would down-thumb facts, cuz who knows, right?
Simple answer is cognitive dissonance.
It's easier than admitting how easily you got conned.
A few simple jingo terms; "safe an effective", despite growing evidence they were anything but. Our (Aussie) health minister is
on the record stating it was a trial, for the purpose of gathering data. Covered his arse.
"Trust the science", despite there being no time for actual scientific double-blind testing. First time in medical history, that the public was used for "gathering data" on the effectiveness, or long-term safety, of a medical procedure. Although there is conjecture about timelines, and pfizer
had just days to "invent" a complex mRNA injection for mass production.
"Herd immunity"including guilt trips that you're "doing it for the vulnerable", despite zero evidence that it stopped transmission, or even offered protection from the virus, and pfizer
later admits this, to very scant coverage from the same mass media who pushed all the lies themselves.
Hell, they even redacted literally
every bit of relevant data, warning of the risks involved with the injections. This means the medical orgs (AMA in Australia) and doctors themselves were complicit in the fraud. Kind of like sharing the guilt around, so that when the penny drops, who do you sue?
So, it's not surprising to see most of the dogpile crew here, ignoring reality, and preferring to shoot the messenger. It's what they do here.