0
   

Former Chinese 'dissendent' died

 
 
Robert Gentel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 01:04 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
I've always been interested in the immense and continual civil rights abuses in China, and note that they get virtually zero attention on this board from the people who accuse Bush and Cheney of every civil rights abuse imaginable, even when there isn't any evidence to support their allegations.


American movies get more attention on able2know than Chinese movies too. Same with music, books, culture, language, news....

It could be some political bias but it could also be the whole more Americans than Chinese thing. You probably pay less attention to Chinese liberals than American ones, for example.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 01:11 am
@Robert Gentel,
Robert Gentel wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
I've always been interested in the immense and continual civil rights abuses in China, and note that they get virtually zero attention on this board from the people who accuse Bush and Cheney of every civil rights abuse imaginable, even when there isn't any evidence to support their allegations.


American movies get more attention on able2know than Chinese movies too. Same with music, books, culture, language, news....

It could be some political bias but it could also be the whole more Americans than Chinese thing. You probably pay less attention to Chinese liberals than American ones, for example.

It is logical that Americans, which many of the members here are, might talk about their own country more, even in a negative way, simply because it is their country. However, my gut feeling is that there are many members here who are tempermentally disposed to seek bad things to say about America. China has a tremendously worse human rights situation than America. It is not far wrong to say that significant dissent is usually punished there.
Robert Gentel
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 01:33 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
It is logical that Americans, which many of the members here are, might talk about their own country more, even in a negative way, simply because it is their country. However, my gut feeling is that there are many members here who are tempermentally disposed to seek bad things to say about America.


I'm sure that there are. I for one will criticize America's record on human rights much more readily than China's and that's mainly because America positions itself as a leader in that regard (and no, this is not just some impression, the US likes to do stuff like grade the world on these things and give them all report cards) and China is notorious for it's deficiencies in that regard. America (and most of the world) simply hold themselves to a higher standard and this is reflected in that others too will hold them to a higher standard. I can also exert more influence on America's human rights through criticism than China's. For better or for worse America has a higher profile as the world's sole superpower and as such America's human rights standards are of much more global importance than China's.

Nevertheless, I find plenty of discussions about it on able2know, but usually not from Americans (I see a lot more of that from Australian liberals for example). So I suspect the limited criticism of China from American liberals has more to do with how it is further from their sphere of influence (both ways). The Australian liberals tend to pay more attention to human rights in Asia than Americans do though, and I think it has to do with a more global outlook that non-Americans tend to have as well as greater proximity with China.

Hey, I'm sure some people here are irrationally anti-American, which is what I think you are ultimately trying to say. But you don't pay as much attention to their human rights abuses either, and it's certainly not because you have it out for America.
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 02:31 am
@Robert Gentel,
Quote:
....I for one will criticize America's record on human rights much more readily than China's and that's mainly because America positions itself as a leader in that regard (and no, this is not just some impression, the US likes to do stuff like grade the world on these things and give them all report cards) and China is notorious for it's deficiencies in that regard. America (and most of the world) simply hold themselves to a higher standard and this is reflected in that others too will hold them to a higher standard. I can also exert more influence on America's human rights through criticism than China's. For better or for worse America has a higher profile as the world's sole superpower and as such America's human rights standards are of much more global importance than China's.


I wholeheartedly share your view (on both the US & China), Robert. The US because of all the wasted precious opportunities (while the world's sole "super power", now waning) to exert a much more positive influence on world events when it had the opportunity. The saddest thing, as I see things, is that Obama's administration has continued with US "business as usual" policy in Afghanistan. Another "surge" will eliminate "the enemy" & win. Old thinking & the consequences of it do not bear thinking about too closely. Very disappointing.
And China. The "old (repressive) guard" still rules the show. Attempts at liberalization (see my next post ), which I strongly suspect many ordinary Chinese people might actually support, appear to have fallen on deaf ears with the leadership. One hopes, as the old guard dies out, that real change might actually be possible. I certainly hope so, because China is going to play a huge/major role in world events in the not too distant future. Look at the recent Copenhagen conference. China could have made an enormous difference to the (non)outcome.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 02:51 am
A far more recent (24th December, 2009) abuse of freedom of speech and repression in China.:

Leading China Dissident Gets 11-Year Term for Subversion
By ANDREW JACOBS
Published: December 24, 2009/NYT


BEIJING " In an unequivocal rebuke to those pursuing political reforms, a Chinese court on Friday sentenced one of the country’s best-known dissidents to 11 years in prison for subversion.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/12/25/world/25china01/popup.jpg
Police watch supporters of one of China’s most prominent dissidents, Liu Xiaobo, as they stand outside the courthouse where Liu is on trial in Beijing Friday.
Agence France-Presse " Getty Images


Liu Xiaobo, 53, a former literature professor and a dogged critic of China’s single-party political system, was detained in December 2008 after he helped draft a petition known as Charter 08 that demanded the right to free speech, open elections and the rule of law.

Quote:
The 11-page verdict, largely a restatement of his indictment, was read out Friday morning at the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court, said Mr. Liu’s lawyer, Shang Baojun. In addition to his prison term, Mr. Liu will be deprived of his political rights for an additional two years, a penalty that will prevent him from writing or speaking out on a wide range of issues.

“We are just extremely disappointed,” said Mr. Shang, who added that Mr. Liu intended to appeal the verdict.

Gregory May, first secretary with the U.S. Embassy who stood outside the courthouse Friday morning, called on the authorities to immediately release Mr. Liu.

“Persecution of individuals for the peaceful expression of political views is inconsistent with internationally recognized norms of human rights,” he said.

Although Mr. Liu had faced a 15-year sentence, legal experts and human rights advocates said the punishment was very harsh and was meant to send a message to others who might agitate for political reform in one of the world’s longest-running authoritarian governments.

Nicholas Bequelin, a senior Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch in Hong Kong, described Mr. Liu as “a sacrificial lamb” and said that the Communist Party leadership was trying to intimidate its critics. The rights group called the trial “a travesty of justice.”

Mr. Bequelin and others said Mr. Liu’s prosecution for violating rights enshrined in China’s Constitution suggested a political hardening, a trend that began before the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

“It shows that the leadership is increasingly conservative and restrictive of basic freedoms,” Mr. Bequelin said, “and it also sends a strong message to the rest of the world that China is not really serious when it talks about human rights.”.... <cont>



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/25/world/asia/25china.html[/b]
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 02:58 am
@msolga,
msolga wrote:

A far more recent (24th December, 2009) abuse of freedom of speech and repression in China.:


I think that's the reason why Brandon revived this thread.
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 03:07 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Yes, I do see that now I've back-tracked to the start of this thread, Walter. (Sorry, I didn't start at the beginning of the thread.)

The thing is, how can anyone be so critical of China's bloody mindedness on human rights & other issues while being so blind to that of their own country's influence?

I guess that's what Robert has been saying , too. You've got to look at the whole picture.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 08:24 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

Green Witch wrote:

Maybe because Bush was our home problem and responsibility. I know I felt nothing buy embarrassment during the Bush years and wanted to shout from the roof tops that I disagreed with my government. I do not feel like I can change much in China, other than boycotting their products (which is not always easy to do). I think the Chinese will have to fight their way out of their injustices as we voted our way out in the last election.

Maybe it's just the "blame America first" crowd.


Maybe it's a case up fixing up your own house before criticizing the home of your neighbor.

0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 09:53 am
Okay. Well, going beyond my original point, I have always felt that having a billion people in an modern, industrialized, stable dictatorship is a very disturbing thing and that those people ought to be free. When the country in question is a small, impoverished unstable country with a new government every five years, it seems to me to be less significant than a huge, stable, relatively wealthy totalitarian country.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 01:27 pm
I thought the people over there ought to be free at least from the time they invaded Tibet, perhaps sooner. When one gets older, a statement made thirty years ago can seem fresh enough without amplifying it. Specially when it seems futile to protest. Their being screwed does not lessen the blame George bears in USA affairs.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Sat 26 Dec, 2009 02:34 pm
I think what bothers me the most about China is that they are developing into the of worst of capitalism, the worst of fascism and the worst of socialism. They are destroying their environment with their growth, they have to pay bribes to get anything done, their personal choices about having a family are dictated by a committee, their healthcare only works for the rich, their world information is edited by the paranoid and they can't even complain about their problems in a public forum without ending up being jailed and tortured. Perhaps that is good for America. I think if China became a true Democracy, with an invested social conscience, they would be better positioned to be the next superpower. Perhaps we are better off if they just remain the enablers to our addiction to cheap crap. You don't declare war on your customers.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Dec, 2009 08:23 pm
Another fabulous democracy:

Quote:
Moscow Police Disperse Opposition Rally

Moscow, Russia (CNN) -- Moscow police have detained a number of anti-government opposition demonstrators following an unsanctioned protest in a downtown square just hours before the New Year.

"About 40 people were detained out of more than 200 who arrived there," said Alexander Averin, activist with The Other Russia opposition group. Averin was among the protesters but left the scene soon before the police took control of it.

Among the detained were author-turned-opposition figure Eduard Limonov and 82-year-old Lyudmila Alexeyeva, a veteran human rights activist and head of the Moscow Helsinki group....




http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/12/31/russia.demonstrators.detained/index.html
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Dec, 2009 09:19 pm
I recall some opposition rallies getting shoddy treatment from the last administration right here.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 02:05 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

I recall some opposition rallies getting shoddy treatment from the last administration right here.

Yeah, I knew one of you guys would be along soon to say something bad about America. Can you post a link to a reference for what you're alluding to above?
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 09:03 am
@Brandon9000,
It was in the news for eight years. Look it up.
I was saying something bad about the last administration. You righties always construe criticism of your causes as criticism of America. You are only half of America. It does not belong solely to you.
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 09:25 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

It was in the news for eight years. Look it up.
I was saying something bad about the last administration. You righties always construe criticism of your causes as criticism of America. You are only half of America. It does not belong solely to you.

Yeah, I know. I'm just in the group that actually likes it.

I give an indication of systemic suppression of free speech in Russia, and you somehow find it appropriate to mention some story you heard about years ago and cannot provide any details of whatsoever about the White House maybe suppressing free speech in some way long ago. How is that a reasonable response to what I posted about Russia, unless you just want excuses to say something bad about America?
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 09:36 am
@Brandon9000,
The past eight years is not 'years ago' so much as selective remembering on your part. I don't provide links very often, because conservative sites tend to dismiss that kind of story, just as you would dismiss any site that is not conservative. Effort wasted.

It takes a lot of gall to claim half of Americans don't like America, simply because their perspective differs from yours. My efforts are aimed at saving America. People with your negativity are miring it deeper.
Brandon9000
 
  0  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 09:58 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

The past eight years is not 'years ago' so much as selective remembering on your part. I don't provide links very often, because conservative sites tend to dismiss that kind of story, just as you would dismiss any site that is not conservative. Effort wasted.

It takes a lot of gall to claim half of Americans don't like America, simply because their perspective differs from yours. My efforts are aimed at saving America. People with your negativity are miring it deeper.

First of all, I never ever ever said half of Americans don't like America. You just made that up

Secondly, what happened is that I posted an article related to widespread suppression of free speech in Russia, and somehow you think an appropriate response is to tell me that you half remember something from years ago about someone's free speech being suppressed in America. If that isn't negativity, I don't know what is.

Finally, systemic suppression of anti-government speech isn't exactly on the same level with a once in a blue moon suppression of speech in the US.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 10:00 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

Secondly, what happened is that I posted an article related to widespread suppression of free speech in Russia, ...


Since I started this thread about a dissident in China - may I ask you how that is related?

I've learnt that for some Americans all outside the USA is the same, but China and Russia are really quite different, not only geographically.

But perhaps you start your own thread about that?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Jan, 2010 10:03 am
@Brandon9000,
As Walter points out, you expanded on the topic in question. I responded to it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/04/2025 at 09:08:36