3
   

Is France "stingy"?

 
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2005 10:19 pm
And our most valuable asset...the 11,000+ souls on the ground over there.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 01:22 am
timberlandko wrote:
Just a side note re the US contribution to the relief effort; there is quite a bit more to it than just the $350 Million figure on which The Media have fixated.


You are certainly correct, timber.

I think, however, sincer others don't include such numbers, too, ....
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 01:50 am
Re: Is France "stingy"?
Ticomaya wrote:
U.N. muckety-muck Jan Egeland recently claimed that the US and other "rich" Western nations are "stingy" when it comes to providing money for humanitarian crises. He has now claimed his comment has been "misinterpreted."

Just looking at the pending tsunami disaster in Asia, the US has already pledged $35,000,000 in "preliminary aid" to the region. UK, Japan ($30 mil), Australia ($27 mil), Saudi Arabia ($10 mil), Germany ($2.7 mil), and Canada, have all pledged large sums. France has pledged $135,000.

Isn't France missing a couple of zeros in that sum? Not that it much matters, but they have lost 14 countrymen to this disaster, which is more than the 12 US citizens confirmed dead. Of course many are still missing, and the death toll is at 80,000 now and rising.

Are there any Francophiles out there who can explain this?

Quote:
French Tsunami Toll 14 Dead, 35 Missing-Minister

Tuesday, December 28, 2004 3:23:03 PM ET

PARIS (Reuters) - The number of French victims of southern Asia's tsunami disaster has risen to 14 and at least 35 people are missing after being swept away by giant waves, Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said on Tuesday.

"At the moment I can say there are 14 French dead in this tragedy for sure, 35 or 37 missing who we are searching for and there are 105 French injured," he told France 2 television from the Sri Lankan capital Colombo, where he arrived with aid supplies earlier on Tuesday.

"There are probably dozens of French we are searching for and don't know where they are," he said.

"Many French and Europeans left on vacation without saying when or where they were going. So unfortunately we have to consider these numbers to be provisional."

Barnier was due to continue to Thailand on Wednesday morning to bring aid supplies and survey the damage from the giant wall of water triggered by an earthquake in Sumatra.

The French Defense Ministry was sending eight experts in identifying bodies and a military airplane that will fly over the Maldives and the Thai coast to search for people cut off by the flood and for the bodies of victims.

Paris has earmarked 100,000 euros ($135,400) for initial rescue efforts in Thailand. It planned to send 16 rescue workers to Thailand on Tuesday and 10 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Sri Lanka in the next few days, the ministry said. ($1=.7386 Euro)
© Reuters 2004. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.


LINK


Your post is deep, dude. Deep like the Great Wall of China is unimpressive and Spanish. The answer is yes, France is stingy.

This, however, doesn't make America any less stingy, which begs the question: what is the point of this thread?

Incidentally, France is one of the less magnanimous nations in the world. They still come up far, far ahead of the United States in most aid-related areas.

Which is sad.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 03:24 am
Quote:
Tsunami aid likely to be given EU budget flexibility

06.01.2005 - 09:57 CET | By Honor Mahony The European Commission has indicated that it is not likely to punish EU countries that breach the rules governing the euro as a result of giving aid to victims of the tsunami disaster in south east Asia.

Spokesperson for monetary affairs Amelia Torres on Wednesday (6 January) said that the Commission was expected to treat the aid as an exception.

"All expenses must be counted during the assessment of the size of the budget deficit," she said, according to Reuters. "But the tsunami aid may be treated as an exceptional circumstance."

The European Commission is in charge of making sure that member states adhere to the euro rules - known as the stability pact. These say that countries may not run budget deficits of more than 3 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).

Ms Torres' comments came as Germany on Wednesday pledged 500m euro for the tsunami victims.

A country may escape being punished for breaching the stability pact if its deficit is caused by a natural disaster or severe economic recession.

Berlin has breached the stability pact three times in a row and is pushing for a more flexible interpretation of the rules to allow for the exclusion of certain types of spending, such as for reseach, from deficit calculations.

Court case?
Germany's repeated breaking of the pact rules is having repercussions elsewhere in the EU.

Liberal members of the European Parliament want to take the European Commission to court for letting Germany and the other serial pact breacher, France, off the hook last month.

In December, monetary affairs commission Joaquin Almunia announced that the Commission would not be pursuing excessive deficit procedures against Paris and Berlin although the countries may break the 3 per cent ceiling in 2005, as well.

The liberal group, the third biggest in the European Parliament, is using a paper by Cologne-based Professor Bernhard Kempen to back up their calls.

Professor Kempen concluded that the liberals would have a case for going to court.

Silvana Koch-Merin, leader of the German FDP faction in the Liberal group, said "Almunia buckled under pressure from the German and French governments. That is a scandal. The Commission is supposed to be the guardian of the [EU] treaties" .

The Liberals will now try and rally support from other groups in the European Parliament.
Source

Please notice, the 'liberal' outsite the USA is used differently.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 04:03 am
I thought that Le Monde cartoon was rather funny, myself. I also think its the blogger, rather than the Monde journalist, who needs to get over himself already. For one, re: this "gem":

JustWonders wrote:
Quote:
Note the cartoon is linked to this story entitled "How the U.N. is Coordinating Aid to a Devastated Asia." What's it about? Basically, French resentment that the U.S. is making a bid at being the leader of a "humanitarian coalition" assisting the hundreds of thousands devastated by the massive seaquake. The short article is, encore, obsessed with the U.N. (read: France) having a major role! Yawn.

Yawn indeed. UN has been playing exactly that major, scratch: central role in humanitarian operations for decades. Thats how come they have their World Food Program and so on - funded and authorized for exactly that job by the collectivity of the UN member states, may I add.

And yes, it is somewhat aggravating to see that now, in a continent's greatest hour of need, the aid operations are complicated by petty American resentments about the UN over the Iraq fracas, which apparently have made the US decide that it's really practical to set up a wholly parallel international structure, a "global coalition" of their own. Working parallel to and apparently as a kind of rival of the regular UN operations, which are based on specific aid agencies' expertise built up over dozens of such kinds of operations over the decade. Bush and Annan didnt speak with each other for many days after the disaster - as if it wouldnt be kinda practical to, you know - co-ordinate and doublecheck things a bit with each other instead of making it a prestige race of who can prove himself the better alternative.

And yes, re: the cartoon, it is aggravating to see that countries around the world are now sinking tons of money into aid - many countries, amongst others Australia and most EU countries, a higher per capita sum than the US as we have seen - but see the US be the major one to use it as a flag-waving, "let me do this, I know best, see all what we're doing" chest-thumping opportunity. Typical American, of course - or at least, right in line with the stereotypes about Americans - and hence all too well suited for a cartoon like this, alas.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 04:11 am
I would have thought any objections to the cartoon would, in the language and "logic" of this thread, be attributable only to the lack of a sense of humour, and therefore utterly ridiculous and laughable in themselves.

I guess what is sauce for the goose ISN''T sauce for the gander?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 06:48 am
Quote:
Australia raised its total aid pledge to US$810 million (euro610 million), the largest government contribution, topping Germany's euro500 million (US$660 million), followed by Japan and the United States.

The United States was the first to raise the aid race stakes last week by pledging US$350 million (euro263 million). It's now fourth on the donor list and has sent in an aircraft carrier group and thousands of troops. Japan promised $500 million (euro376.7 million) last week.

On the sidelines of the meeting, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the European Union will immediately donate euro100 million (US$132 million) for tsunami relief and look at setting up a euro1 billion (US$1.32 billion) loan for affected nations.

Barroso said he also would ask the European Parliament to approve another euro350 million (US$461 million) in aid for longer term reconstruction of devastated countries.


But this should really br people's mind:

Quote:
Donor nations must deliver on their pledges, says Annan
By Mike Corder, AP
06 January 2005


Getting aid to millions of tsunami victims is a race against time and nations must come forward immediately with the aid they've promised, The UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said today at an emergency summit.

World leaders have gathered in Indonesia, hardest hit by the 26 December disaster, to figure out the best way to speed aid to victims. While nearly US$4 billion (euro3 billion) has been pledged worldwide, the United Nations has warned some of the promises might not be honored as in previous disasters.

Annan urged nations to channel US$1.7 billion (euro1.3 billion) of the funds to the United Nations for relief, including US$977 million (euro740 million) for emergency aid.

"Whole communities have disappeared," Annan said, calling for the establishment of a tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean. "Millions in Asia, Africa, and even in far away countries, are suffering unimaginable trauma and psychological wounds that will take a long time to heal. Families have been torn apart.

"The disaster was so brutal, so quick, and so far-reaching, that we are still struggling to comprehend it," Annan added, stressing the need for donor "pledges to be converted into cash quickly ... It is a race against time."
Source for both quotations
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 06:54 am
Be interesting to know who reneged last time - no wonder the UN guy was so cynical.....

We won't - this is too good a chance to mend some regional fences.

And - much as I dislike our right wing government, they are honourable about things like that.

And - feeling for those affected is so strong here, I think the people would break into parliament and throttle them with our bare hands!! The private donation is huge here. Pity we are not so conscious of the need to help when people are just suffering in the normal way, eh?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 06:58 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Quote:
Australia raised its total aid pledge to US$810 million (euro610 million), the largest government contribution, topping Germany's euro500 million (US$660 million), followed by Japan and the United States. ...


Now, if we were a boastful lot ..... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:14 am
dlowan wrote:
The private donation is huge here. Pity we are not so conscious of the need to help when people are just suffering in the normal way, eh?


Same here: more than 220 million € (300 million $) are privately donated until now - that's donated, not announced or so.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:31 am
nimh wrote:
And yes, re: the cartoon, it is aggravating to see that countries around the world are now sinking tons of money into aid - many countries, amongst others Australia and most EU countries, a higher per capita sum than the US as we have seen - but see the US be the major one to use it as a flag-waving, "let me do this, I know best, see all what we're doing" chest-thumping opportunity. Typical American, of course - or at least, right in line with the stereotypes about Americans - and hence all too well suited for a cartoon like this, alas.


Where exactly do you see this chest thumping taking place? The only thing I have seen is the Media covering it. Perhaps if you paid less attention to American media you wouldn't see as much as you do.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:42 am
McGentrix wrote:
Where exactly do you see this chest thumping taking place? [..] Perhaps if you paid less attention to American media you wouldn't see as much as you do.

Looks like you answered your own question there already. Oh, and there's A2K of course - and probly a million other boards with Americans just like you.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:45 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
dlowan wrote:
The private donation is huge here. Pity we are not so conscious of the need to help when people are just suffering in the normal way, eh?


Same here: more than 220 million € (300 million $) are privately donated until now - that's donated, not announced or so.


If it hasn't been announced, how do you know about it and why are you posting about it?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:48 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Same here: more than 220 million € (300 million $) are privately donated until now - that's donated, not announced or so.

Private donations here are €55 million so far, and tonight there'll be the big all-night TV action. In comparison, the 1984 "One for Africa" action ("we are the world" and all that) raised €44 million in all. Course, people had less money back then.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:49 am
<merged with next post>
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:50 am
McGentrix wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
dlowan wrote:
The private donation is huge here. Pity we are not so conscious of the need to help when people are just suffering in the normal way, eh?


Same here: more than 220 million € (300 million $) are privately donated until now - that's donated, not announced or so.


If it hasn't been announced, how do you know about it and why are you posting about it?


As you could have seen, when you'd read what you posted, that was an answer to dlowans posting.
I sincerely hope, this qualifies as a response - even in your eyes.

I got the sum from the media: the just added the amounts openly know, like from tv shows, presented by charities or by people themselves.
I
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:50 am
McGentrix wrote:
how do you know about it and why are you posting about it?

Probly cause Lash and others were asking about it earlier, how much private and corporate donations were?

Lash wrote:
Private donations (corporate and individual) are skyrocketing. I saw where Canada is sending alot, too. Corps are sending millions. That's why I asked about your figures, nimh. They are keeping up with private and corporate donations. Wanted to see the amounts--not so much to compare--but to tally.

Tallying ...
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:50 am
nimh wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
Where exactly do you see this chest thumping taking place? [..] Perhaps if you paid less attention to American media you wouldn't see as much as you do.

Looks like you answered your own question there already. Oh, and there's A2K of course - and probly a million other boards with Americans just like you.


So you are basing your contempt of American generosity from what you read on internet chat forums? Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:51 am
McGentrix wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
dlowan wrote:
The private donation is huge here. Pity we are not so conscious of the need to help when people are just suffering in the normal way, eh?


Same here: more than 220 million € (300 million $) are privately donated until now - that's donated, not announced or so.


If it hasn't been announced, how do you know about it and why are you posting about it?


It's one thing to report on donations & quite another to gloat, or be disparaging about "stingy" donations from other countries
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Jan, 2005 07:56 am
Can you really not read McG or do you just prefer not to?

What's "Oh, and there's" mean to you?

Man A: What do you want to invade Iraq and depose Saddam for?
Man B: Cause he murdered millions of people. Oh, and there's that thing about shooting at US planes checking the no-fly zone of course.
Man A: So you are basing your case for invading Iraq and deposing Saddam on them taking the occasional pot-shots at yer planes?

Rolling Eyes

Oh, and I don't have any contempt for "American generosity"; only annoyed at the chest-thumping some seem intent on accompanying it with. Like I said, basically ...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Islamic Terrorists Strike France - Discussion by hawkeye10
France Launches Airstrikes in Mali - Discussion by H2O MAN
ALLONS ENFANTS . . . - Discussion by Setanta
What is Christmas like in France? - Discussion by DrewDad
Carla Bruni Blasts Berlusconi's Obama Remark - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Riots in France - Discussion by Finn dAbuzz
A surprise? French Socialists pro EU-constitution - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is France "stingy"?
  3. » Page 22
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 06:45:56