2
   

Do you think I need a copyright?

 
 
PamO
 
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 08:27 am
I have a great idea for jewelry design. I will need to outsource most of the work to be done on these pieces. I am afraid that the idea will be copied by whomever I choose to do this work for me...

Do I need to copyright my design to "own" it?

How do I go about finding a lawyer who can help me with this?

Thank you for your time! PamO.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 1,625 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 08:33 am
Definitely...or else you may see your design with someone elses name on it. Good luck with your venture!!
0 Replies
 
PamO
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 08:44 am
Thanks Kristie! Anyone else with an idea on what type of lawyer? Are they called copyright lawyers? Sorry for my ignorance! I appreciate the help...Smile
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 10:00 am
PamO: There are relatively few lawyers who do only copyright work. Most lawyers who do this kind of work call themselves "intellectual property" lawyers, and they also handle patent and trademark cases. I imagine that very few lawyers have ever handled a jewelry design copyright case, but maybe if there are any jewelry trade journals you could look in the classified ads to see if any lawyers advertise their expertise in this field. Otherwise, contact your local bar association (here's the Houston Bar Association website) and ask them to provide you with the names of some intellectual property lawerys or law firms.
0 Replies
 
PamO
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 12:11 pm
Thank you so much. I will do just that. Thank you again, joefromchicago.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 12:32 pm
I know about copyrights in the field of software-- so my informed layman's understanding of copyrights is centered on computer programs.

But, I doubt if a jewelry design can be copyrighted.

Copyrights protect a "specific expression of an idea". In software, this means that the exact program is protected (that is the words I used) but the "idea" is not protected. Someone could make a program that looks and works like mine, and if the code wasn't copied word for word, there isn't much I can do about it.

There is no way to protect an idea using a copyright. You could try for a patent, but this requires proof that it is unique as well as time and expense and trouble.

For this reason, in the field of software, we often get "non-disclosure" agreements (NDAs) in situations like this... when we have a great idea and we want other folks to work on it, but we want to ensure they won't steal the idea. NDA are quite common when you are trying to start a new business.

You should certainly discuss this with a lawyer.

When I was looking into starting a business, I spoke to a small business lawyer that was paid for by the SBA. They were fully capable to answer this type of question. You probably want to look at other issues like tradmarks etc.

I would ask your outsourcers to sign a NDA (or non-compete contract) before I gave them any secrets.
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 07:09 pm
I was undert the impression that works of art are automatically copyrighted. Just like writing. is that not the case?

I think it only needs copywriting if it's going to be mass produced. That's just a guess.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2004 07:23 pm
Try this link. It might have some information you can use. Good luck. http://www.ganoksin.com/orchid/archive/199912/msg00123.htm
0 Replies
 
PamO
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2004 09:02 am
Thanks for the link, cicerone imposter. My husband is a geologist and we are going to the big Tuscon Gem and Mineral show (Feb.05) that is heavily advertised on that site.

scoates, I would like to mass produce these pieces...so I do think a copyright is in order. Thanks for chiming in!

I know that I can reasearch this myself and I will...I always use A2K as a resource first, because everyone is so knowledgeable/helpful and full of ideas.
0 Replies
 
PamO
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2004 09:04 am
Oh and thanks as well to ebrown_p! Smile
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2004 10:17 am
ebrown_p: Jewelry designs can be copyrighted. In fact, one of the cases that is probably in every copyright law textbook is a case involving just that question (I wish I could remember it -- if I find it on the web I'll post a link).

In general, any artistic work that can be fixed in a medium is copyrightable, whereas utilitarian objects cannot be copyrighted. The question in many cases, then, is whether the object is primarily artistic or primarily utilitarian. Jewelry, I think, is a fairly easy case: although there is a utilitarian purpose for jewelry (decoration), it is primarily an artistic expression. Thus, jewelry designs can be copyrighted.

SCoates: You are correct: works of art are automatically copyrighted under the Berne Convention. Registration of the copyright, however, provides additional -- and extremely valuable -- protections for the copyright holder.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2004 10:53 am
Joe, I am always curious about this stuff.

What do you copyright with jewelry?

If I make a silver ring that has 4 rubies in a square, and someone else has a silver ring that has 4 rubies in a rectangle, is this violating my copyright...

It seems that there would be a lot of gray area.

I know that since I wrote "George Bush is a dumb as a rotten tomato on the third of July" this unique combination of words is now owned by me.

As I understand it I don't have any claim to the idea Bush is dumb, or even to comparing Bush to a tomato.

It seems to me that claiming damages for a similar jewelry design would be awfully hard to prove, unless it were a clear egregious and exact copy.

I guess that's what they have law school for...

Based on my knowledge of the lack of protection for ideas in software, I still think a NDA is a great idea.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2004 12:36 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Joe, I am always curious about this stuff.

What do you copyright with jewelry?

The artistic work that is embodied in the jewelry itself. For instance, if I designed a ring, I could not copyright the ring's circular form, since that is purely utilitarian. For the same reason, I couldn't copyright the post on an earring. But I could copyright the design of the ring or the earring.

ebrown_p wrote:
If I make a silver ring that has 4 rubies in a square, and someone else has a silver ring that has 4 rubies in a rectangle, is this violating my copyright...

It seems that there would be a lot of gray area.

A lot would depend upon the uniqueness of the design. I couldn't copyright the pattern of four stones in a square, because I'm certain that particular design is already in the public domain.

ebrown_p wrote:
I know that since I wrote "George Bush is a dumb as a rotten tomato on the third of July" this unique combination of words is now owned by me.

A simple phrase like that can't be copyrighted. Your best bet would be to trademark it.

ebrown_p wrote:
As I understand it I don't have any claim to the idea Bush is dumb, or even to comparing Bush to a tomato.

I'm sure those sentiments are also in the public domain :wink:

ebrown_p wrote:
It seems to me that claiming damages for a similar jewelry design would be awfully hard to prove, unless it were a clear egregious and exact copy.

I'm no expert on jewelry, but I imagine that the designer aims for uniqueness of expression. I don't know the extent to which such uniqueness is attainable.

ebrown_p wrote:
I guess that's what they have law school for...

Well, that's one of the reasons.

ebrown_p wrote:
Based on my knowledge of the lack of protection for ideas in software, I still think a NDA is a great idea.

A non-disclosure agreement is only practical when one is dealing with trade secrets. Since jewelry is expressly designed to be displayed in public, however, a non-disclosure agreement really doesn't offer very much protection for the designer.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Do you think I need a copyright?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 03:38:01