1
   

Scott Peterson: GUILTY

 
 
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 05:52 pm
Scott Peterson convicted of murdering wife

Quote:
Scott Peterson (news - web sites) was convicted Friday of murdering his pregnant wife and dumping her body in San Francisco Bay in what prosecutors in the made-for-cable-TV case portrayed as a cold-blooded plot to escape marriage and fatherhood for the bachelor life.


Peterson, 32, could get the death penalty. The former fertilizer salesman was convicted of one count of first-degree murder for killing his wife, Laci, and one count of second-degree murder in the death of the son she was carrying.


Peterson stared straight ahead with no show of emotion as the verdict was read, then looked at each of the jurors as they were polled to confirm their decisions. The jurors looked serious, and none appeared to look back at Peterson. Cheers broke out among the hundreds of onlookers who gathered outside court — some of them pumping their fists in celebration upon hearing the news on the radio.


Laci Peterson (news - web sites)'s mother, Sharon Rocha, sobbed as the verdicts were read, and her son Brent wrapped his arm tightly around her. Laci's friends in the gallery, arms around each other, cried. Sobs and loud sighs could be heard in the courtroom. After the jury was dismissed, prosecutor James Brazelton reached forward and patted the shoulder of the lead detective, whose testimony in the case proved pivotal.


The verdict came after a five-month trial that was an endless source of fascination to the tabloids, People magazine and the cable networks with its story of an attractive, radiant young couple awaiting the birth of their first child, a cheating husband, and a slaying for which prosecutors had no eyewitnesses, no weapon, not even a cause of death.


The verdict followed a tumultuous seven days of deliberations in which two jurors were removed for unspecified reasons and the judge twice told the panel to start over.


The jury of six men and six women was told to return Nov. 22 to begin hearing testimony on whether Peterson should die by lethal injection or get life in prison without parole.


Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old substitute teacher, was eight months pregnant when she vanished around Christmas Eve 2002. Four months later, her headless body and the remains of her fetus were discovered along the shoreline about 90 miles from the couple's Modesto home — not far from where her husband claims he was fishing alone the day of her disappearance.


Peterson was soon arrested in the San Diego area, more than 400 miles from home, carrying nearly $15,000, his hair and goatee bleached blond.


Police never were able to establish exactly when, how or where Laci died.


At trial, prosecutors presented 174 witnesses and hundreds of pieces of evidence, from wiretapped phone calls to videotaped police interrogations, depicting Peterson as a liar and a philanderer who was sweet-talking his girlfriend, massage therapist Amber Frey, at the same time he was trying to show the world he was pining for his missing wife.


Prosecutor Rick Distaso told the jury that Peterson could not stand the thought of being trapped in a "dull, boring, married life with kids," and either strangled or smothered his wife and dumped her weighted-down body overboard from his fishing boat.


"He wants to live the rich, successful, freewheeling bachelor life. He can't do that when he's paying child support, alimony and everything else," Distaso said. "He didn't want to be tied to this kid the rest of his life. He didn't want to be tied to Laci for the rest of his life. So he killed her."


The jury heard how Peterson had bought a two-day ocean-fishing license days before his wife disappeared, yet claimed his fishing trip was a last-minute substitution for golf because of blustery weather. Prosecutors also offered evidence suggesting he used a bag of cement mix to make concrete anchors to sink his wife's body into the bay.


After a day off for Veterans Day, jurors resumed deliberations Friday at the end of a chaotic week in which the judge removed two members of the panel. The final 12 members deliberated for about 8 hours Wednesday and Friday before reaching their verdict, which the judge prohibited from being broadcast on television.


A huge crowd massed outside the courthouse in Redwood City, where the case was moved after defense attorneys argued Peterson had been demonized in his hometown of Modesto to the point that he couldn't get a fair trial. "He's a sicko. He needs to fry," said Bob Johnston, 42. "I wanted to see that justice was served."


Prosecutors and defense lawyers remain under a gag order that prevents them from commenting.





Peterson never took the stand. His lawyers argued that he was the victim of a frame-up. They suggested that someone else — perhaps homeless people, sex offenders or suspicious-looking characters spotted in the neighborhood — abducted Laci Peterson while she walked the dog, then killed her and dumped the body in the water after learning of Peterson's fishing-trip alibi.

Peterson's lawyers also offered evidence that the fetus may have died days or weeks after the disappearance, when Scott was being watched closely by the police and the media.

And they explained his lies and inconsistent statements about his affair and his activities around the time of the disappearance as the mutterings of a man in the midst of a breakdown over his missing wife.

Defense attorney Mark Geragos acknowledged the jurors probably hated Peterson, and pleaded with them not to convict him simply because the prosecution had made him look like a "jerk and a liar."

Geragos also noted the lingering questions about how Laci died. "Maybe the logical explanation for the fact that we have no evidence of her struggling in that house, dying in that house is because it didn't happen in that house," he said.

In addition, Geragos said police found that someone had used a computer in the Petersons' home on the morning Laci vanished — after authorities contend Laci was already dead — to search Web sites for a scarf and a sunflower-motif umbrella stand. He suggested the user was Laci Peterson.

The story proved irresistible to the cable networks, which almost every night brought in experts to pick apart the two sides' legal strategies and expound on some of the soap opera aspects of the case, which included hours of secretly taped calls in which Peterson spun out elaborate tales to Frey.

Frey herself testified, saying that Peterson told her during their affair that he had "lost his wife." But she said that in all their recorded conversations, he repeatedly professed his love for his wife and never said anything to incriminate himself in her slaying.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,254 • Replies: 21
No top replies

 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 05:55 pm
Jeez, I wondered when someone would get around to starting a thread on this story!

Surely one of the most compelling non-events of the 21st Century. But OK, full disclosure: I was rooting for a conviction...
0 Replies
 
SCoates
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 05:59 pm
Why is this such a big story. I just had a phone call at work where a lady got mad at me because he was convicted.
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 05:59 pm
Guilty
I also believe that Scott Peterson is guilty.

However, this case is far from over. In a trial that lasted as long as this one did, I'm sure appellate attorneys can scour the record and maybe find reversible error.

Does anyone know why two jurors were removed during the course of deliberations?
0 Replies
 
shepaints
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:03 pm
Why weren't Geragos or Peterson's father present
for the verdict?
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:04 pm
article
Jurors find Scott Peterson guilty of murder

Deliberations began last Thursday, but two juror dismissals since then delayed the process.

On Tuesday, Delucchi dismissed Frances Gorman, Juror No. 7, and replaced her with an alternate.

Then, on Wednesday, he removed Gregory Jackson, who was Juror No. 5 and the panel's foreman, over the protests of Peterson's attorneys, who tried to persuade the judge in an hour-long closed-door hearing to keep him on the jury.

Following Jackson's dismissal, the panel elected as its new foreman Juror No. 6, a firefighter and paramedic.

The panel's current 12 members deliberated for less than eight hours before announcing they had reached a verdict.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:04 pm
I believe one juror was seen talking to a member of the public (in or near the courthouse?) and the other was found to be doing her own research.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:07 pm
My word. I posted a thread about this an eternity ago. Speedy trial?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:09 pm
I'm still trying to figure out (although I'm not spending much time on it) what made this a celebrity type case? This kind of unfortunate **** happens every day.....
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:11 pm
slow news year.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:15 pm
farmerman wrote:
slow news year.


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lady J
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 06:26 pm
From my understanding, the three jurors that were excused were:

One deciding to do research on her own (as D'artagnan pointed out)
One was discovered to have degrees in both law and medicine
One was the future son in law of the owner of a restaurant that Scott and Laci once owned in San Luis Obispo (so he knew them both)

I know this case has little meaning to a lot of people and true, things like this do happen all the time, but I did follow it because it happened almost in my own backyard. I think anything that happens close to ones home makes them sit up and take notice a bit more than they would ordinarily.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 07:41 pm
extra crispy?
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 07:47 pm
Lady J. I tried to identify with the woman who was the serial killer here in Florida. I even watched the movie. It gave me no satisfaction.
0 Replies
 
Lady J
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 08:28 pm
Letty,

Was that the case that they based the movie "Monster" where Charlize Theron plays the role of Aileen Carol Wuornos? That whole story creeped me out.

And like that case, the conviction of Peterson really brings me no true satisfaction except to se that sometimes our legal system does do something right.

As for what can never be changed, the crimes themselves, it still leaves me with nothing but sorrow for the deceased and their families. I believe in order to kill someone (except in dire self defense) the killer has to have no conscience and those with no conscience will care nothing about the families left to suffer for the rest of their lives Restitution can never be made for a life taken.

Just so you know why I AM glad when someone gets caught and convicted though? My sister was murdered almost 3 years ago. Her killer has never been caught.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Nov, 2004 09:09 pm
Yes, Lady J. That was the very same. I am stunned about your sister; simply stunned!
0 Replies
 
Lady J
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2004 01:00 pm
Thank you Letty. As was everyone that knew and loved her. She stays in my life in so many ways. There's probably not a day goes by that I don't "talk" to her about something or another. I do find great peace in that. Smile
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2004 01:10 pm
Well, as I have often observed through the eyes of John Donne:

"...every "person's" death diminishes me...."
0 Replies
 
Lady J
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2004 05:29 pm
Letty wrote:
Well, as I have often observed through the eyes of John Donne:

"...every "person's" death diminishes me...."


I appreciate that quote very much, but in looking back I also have to say that every "persons" life also enriches me.

It was a rough year. After my sister, there were 15 more deaths of family or friends within a one year period. None the way she went of course, thank goodness. I rarely talk about any of this, but thank you for listening and letting me share.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2004 05:48 pm
Lady J. A2K isn't really "ask an expert". It's a talk about what hurts; what thrills; what inspires;

I am a part of all that I have met in the actual world and here.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Scott Peterson: GUILTY
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 12:23:14