1
   

Ontology

 
 
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2017 09:26 pm
This thread intends to be an ongoing project where I intend to post videos that I find relevant to the topic. Without further due, I will leave you with my first choice. Feel free to post your own videos.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 753 • Replies: 23
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2017 05:53 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Its quite obvious that metaphysics is self- limiting since it seems to only have one word to identify "being".

Philosophers all seem to subscribe to Calvin 's statement that says, and I paraphrase of course;
"My work is so incomprehensible that it must be full of deep meaning"


ossobucotemp
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2017 06:01 pm
@farmerman,
brat that I am, I'm interested in ontology recapitulating. Only mildly.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2017 06:20 pm
@ossobucotemp,
well it dont always ya know. Sometimes it just rhymes
ossobucotemp
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2017 07:10 pm
@farmerman,
Besides, I meant ontogeny..
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 04:33 am
@ossobucotemp,
I do that all the time.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 05:32 am
@ossobucotemp,
I wonder if it recapitulates philology?
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 07:11 am
It is clear that this is also so necessary in the thread:

0 Replies
 
coluber2001
 
  0  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 08:05 am
@farmerman,
"My work is so incomprehensible that it must be full of deep meaning"

It sounds like poetry.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 09:00 am
@coluber2001,
Are you sure you are not confusing String theory or say, dark energy, with poetry?
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2017 10:55 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
maybe anything that is mostly "mathturbation".
Even the stringies say, If we cant describe it in the material world soon, we in trubble.

Sorta like the "Zombie Apocalypse"
0 Replies
 
Razzleg
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 01:52 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Its quite obvious that metaphysics is self- limiting since it seems to only have one word to identify "being".


The latter part of that statement seems to imply something patently false, got anything to back it up?

farmerman wrote:
Philosophers all seem to subscribe to Calvin 's statement that says, and I paraphrase of course;
"My work is so incomprehensible that it must be full of deep meaning"


Is this a comment about Φ, your inability to quote directly, or you?
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 05:28 am
@Razzleg,
Ahhh, that is up to you grasshopper. Does the baker tell you what is in his chockie chip cookie?

What philosophy dithers about is easily solved by understanding the dimensional relationships ( paraphrsing Chris Zwicky).

ekename
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 06:34 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Speaking of the nature of being, does Slavoj Žižek snort up his mucus for the entire 2 hours and 7 minutes of the performance?

Quote:
Without further due


Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 07:36 am
@ekename,
...both of your comments match each other perfectly. Congratulations for the consistency of your intellect!
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 07:59 am
Another interesting video, yet another take meant to decrease the deficit on intellectual exercise.
In these series of videos I will post different approaches to the topic for the sake of diversity.

Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 08:45 am
Being there is being everywhere.
If I am to aknowledge them I am the set of all qualities.
The distinction between me and the world is just size.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 08:48 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
There is nothing trully Alien. "Alien" is just the absence of my yet to fulfill future.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 09:44 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
The set of all qualities/patterns, if finite, establishes that a growing infinite set of quantity is redundant. "New information" requires new patterns or qualities.
If the motion in the set is a loop of finite patterns then said motion is informatively redundant.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 09:52 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
A Glance at Badiou:

 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
DOES NOTHING EXIST??? - Question by mark noble
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ontology
Copyright © 2017 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/22/2017 at 11:17:11