Stockholm incident: Lorry rams people

A rhetorical flourish, saab.

Then let me know which sunday - the one against terror or the one against Trump.

I think you should look up "rhetorical flourish".

I ask you a question, which I would like to have an answer for.
You ask me to look up rhetorical flourish.

It answers my question about chanting in Stockholm regarding uSA and UK.
It is fake news that you want to spread.

PS rhetorical flourish means the person who says it - is full of BS

Camlok/JTT is only interested in spreading anti Americanism, and will attach himself to any story or cause that makes America, and the West look bad. He waxed quite lyrical about the N. Korean dictatorship recently so he's not remotely interested in human rights.

Perhaps you noticed the italics, saab. That was a full on admission that it was BS, sarcasm, a quip, a jibe, a mock, a sneer, ... .

I have asked hundreds upon hundreds of questions and not you, not anyone wants to answer them. Izzy comes up with his full on lies and you sit silent.

Here's a couple of great questions for you and Izzy.

Why would George W Bush, yes that George W Bush, describe, at least twice, in two separate incidents, TO THE US PRESS, bombs and explosions at WTC when the US government official conspiracy theory [USGOCT] says there was neither bombs or explosions at WTC on 911?

Why wouldn't any "reporters" pick up on that?

Well, Izzy, saab, where are your answers?