I ask you a question, which I would like to have an answer for.
You ask me to look up rhetorical flourish.
It answers my question about chanting in Stockholm regarding uSA and UK.
It is fake news that you want to spread.
PS rhetorical flourish means the person who says it - is full of BS
Perhaps you noticed the italics, saab. That was a full on admission that it was BS, sarcasm, a quip, a jibe, a mock, a sneer, ... .
I have asked hundreds upon hundreds of questions and not you, not anyone wants to answer them. Izzy comes up with his full on lies and you sit silent.
Here's a couple of great questions for you and Izzy.
Why would George W Bush, yes that George W Bush, describe, at least twice, in two separate incidents, TO THE US PRESS, bombs and explosions at WTC when the US government official conspiracy theory [USGOCT] says there was neither bombs or explosions at WTC on 911?
Why wouldn't any "reporters" pick up on that?