1
   

What is tolerance?

 
 
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 04:54 pm
Edit [Moderator]: Moved to Philosophy & Debate from General.

I was discussing how much I despise most of my co-workers with a friend today, and we ended up debating the word tolerance. I say I'm very tolerant, because I have such hatred for these idiots, and yet, I haven't lost it and gone off on them, or tried to do them any bodily harm.

My friend, however, says that to be tolerant is to actually not have these feelings of hate towards people in the first place, and to accept people without feeling ill-will towards them. I think that's just silly. You can't control what your gut feeling is toward certain people. The best you can do is to restrain yourself from killing them, and try to avoid them if possible. That's what I think tolerance is.

Any opinions?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,183 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 05:00 pm
kickycan wrote:
I think that's just silly. You can't control what your gut reaction is towards people. The best you can do is to restrain yourself from killing them, and try to avoid them if possible. That's what I think tolerance is.



I dunno kicky. There are some people whom I don't care for, but there are very few that I would think in terms of killing. To me, tolerance is a "live and let live attitude". I respect differences of opinion, and although I might not choose to be friends with some people, I would not go out of my way to be antagonistic.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 05:03 pm
Tolerance is taking your finger off the trigger.

I think it takes a higher level of enlightenment to be what your friend calls tolerant.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 05:28 pm
Okay, maybe I shouldn't have used the word "kill". I don't really want to kill them, of course. I do, at times, exaggerate a little bit to make a point.

I just can't stand them. And when I talk to them, most of the time I smile, even though inside I am thinking, "I can't stand you, please go somewhere far away from me forever."

So I do, in fact, live and let live. Am I more or less tolerant than the person who really isn't annoyed by others? I think I am even more tolerant, because I control my passionate feelings of dislike, whereas, the person who just accepts people is just doing what comes naturally to them. They aren't restraining themselves. I am putting out a ton more effort to be tolerant. Don't ya think?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 05:30 pm
I think tolerance has more to do with actions than intent, yeah.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 06:07 pm
kickycan--

You're saying that the Special Olympics is more vital and meritworthy than the Olympics because the handicapped participants put forth more effort?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 06:15 pm
Yes Noddy, I think that would be a logical extension of my thinking.

Just like it would be more praiseworthy for a KKK member to meet a black man on the street and smile and shake his hand then it would be for a non-racist person.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 07:28 pm
kickycan--

Would the KKK member be sincere? Or imply working for a spin?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 08:08 pm
It doesn't matter. If the KKK member acts in a respectful way, and is thinking how much he hates the black person, he is being tolerant. More tolerant than someone who is genuinely respectful. He is showing restraint, and no matter his motives (unless he's suckering the guy in so that his hooded friends can launch a surprise attack), he is showing a great amount of tolerance. Do you disagree?
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 08:52 pm
Yes, I do!
Tolerance is not restraining yourself so you won't be disrespectful
to the person you despise. Tolerance means accepting the way of thinking that is different from yours, and sympathize with it.

I for one couldn't tolerate a KKK member - my level of tolerance only
goes so far. On the other hand, I can tolerate a person that has a
different lifestyle to mine.

May I ask you why you despise your co-workers so much?
What is the reason for it?
0 Replies
 
Seed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Oct, 2004 08:53 pm
tolerance is a sticky situation. i say i ahve tolerance but then again... i cant help but sneer at people i hate.... i hate hating but it happens... i say tolerance is def. a live and let live kinda thing
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 09:57 am
Kicky--

I think Calamity Jane and I see a difference between "tolerance" and "polite behavior".

The KKK member believes that Blacks are an inferior race. Speaking with the old cliche, he wouldn't want his daughter to marry one. This is not tolerance.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Oct, 2004 10:03 am
I'm with Seed. I think 'tolerance' is a 'live and let live' sort of thing, with a lack of bearing ill-will. Unless you have the capacity to love everyone, it's the best thing we have to get along with each other.
0 Replies
 
val
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Oct, 2004 03:34 am
Cavfancier, I think I would prefer a KKK to the idea of "live and let live".
I don't like the word tolerance.
Tolerance would be: I don't like the Blacks, I think they are inferior, but I accept they must have the same rights as White (as long as they stay far from me). That's stupid.
The question is: what is the reason that takes you to that opinion about blacks?
Instead of tolerance I think we should be critical about our own convictions. Why do you think that Blacks, Whites, Yellows, Catholics, Theists, Atheists, are superior/inferior. Establish the reasons, if you have any, then try to analyse them, in order to verify their truth.
Criticism is the solution. Tolerance is zero.
0 Replies
 
Bryxamus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Oct, 2004 01:13 am
hatred emplys tolerance. if you had none, hatred would not be possible.
0 Replies
 
Bryxamus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Oct, 2004 01:14 am
hatred emplys tolerance. if you had none, hatred would not be possible.
0 Replies
 
Taliesin181
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2004 04:27 pm
See, I make tolerance synonymous with enlightenment; as a way of truly seeing someone else's perspective and getting to the core of who they are. To use your "KKK member" scenario, kickycan: the KKK member is not being tolerant, he is, in effect, just lying. If this same member "saw the light" or whatever you want to call it, and accepted the black man as his equal, then that would be tolerance. Just shaking his hand to be polite, though, is not. However, being polite is important, but it's better to have underlying values that correspond with these behaviors.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What is tolerance?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 09:00:58