3
   

As Corn Devours U.S. Prairies, Greens Reconsider Biofuel Mandate

 
 
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 05:30 am

As Corn Devours U.S. Prairies, Greens Reconsider Biofuel Mandate
Groups now seek overhaul of U.S. renewable fuel quota
Program blamed for boosting corn crops at prairie’s expense

Jennifer A Dlouhy
July 27, 2016 — 5:00 AM EDT

Environmentalists who once championed biofuels as a way to cut pollution are now turning against a U.S. program that puts renewable fuels in cars, citing higher-than-expected carbon dioxide emissions and reduced wildlife habitat.

More than a decade after conservationists helped persuade Congress to require adding corn-based ethanol and other biofuels to gasoline, some groups regret the resulting agricultural runoff in waterways and conversion of prairies to cropland -- improving the odds that lawmakers might seek changes to the program next year.

"The big green groups that got invested in biofuels are tacitly realizing the blunder," said John DeCicco, a research professor at the University of Michigan Energy Institute who previously focused on automotive strategies at the Environmental Defense Fund. "It’s really hard for the people who really -- shall we say -- hate oil viscerally, to think that this alternative that we’ve been promoting is today worse than oil."

The green backlash could give a boost to long-stalled congressional efforts to overhaul the Renewable Fuel Standard, including proposals to limit the amount of traditional, corn-based ethanol that counts toward the mandate, as environmentalists side with anti-hunger groups and even the oil industry in calling for change. The RFS forces refiners to blend steadily escalating amounts of biofuel into the gas supply. Most of the mandate is currently fulfilled by corn-based ethanol, which makes up nearly 10 percent of U.S. gasoline and provides oxygen that helps the fuel burn cleaner.

Broken Promise
The Natural Resources Defense Council ...


http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-07-27/as-corn-devours-u-s-prairies-greens-reconsider-biofuel-mandate

It has been evident for about 8 years that progress on advanced biofuels was stalled, and that the mandate program supporting ethanol blended gasoline was a political boondoggle feeding the agricultural industry. It's time for it to go.
 
Brand X
 
  3  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 06:10 am
Environmental lobbyist plus Big Ag lobbyist was a very powerful duo to get ethanol going...and it's going to take who knows what to stop it.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  3  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 06:14 am
Al Gore was for it before he was against it. Hmmm...where have we heard that before???

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/23/al-gore-corn-ethanol-subsidies_n_787776.html
0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 07:59 am
@bobsal u1553115,
It's Monsatan, Bobs - They'll do as they please - 2+2=5.
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 08:16 am
The Renewable Fuel Standard is living proof that perception is more important to most 'environmentalists' than science or reality. Sure, Big Ag. pushes it but it took the environmentalists embracing of it to make it happen.

The question is how anyone saw even the perception that the RFS made any sense. This monstrosity desperately needs to die.
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 08:24 am
@Leadfoot,
theres absolutely NO environmental nor energy budget reasons to embrace Biofuels other than waste oil esterification for diesels.

We set up a small diesel op several years ago an now that frcked "wet gas" and propane fuels are saving usso much in our energy uses, we could totally drop this program as a feasible but unreasonable source of fuels.

ethanol is better making bourbon or other whiskies.

Corn is best used for food , not for fuel.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 08:39 am
I was never in favor of corn in gas tanks.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 08:56 am
Hillary's General is corny.

'"You know what they should say below the no ethanol border? 'no ethanol! Send your money to Venezuela' because that's what it is. We're spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year importing oil and some cases refined products so we can burn it in our cars and spew in out in the exhaust. Why not keep that money here where is circulates in the economy? For health reasons, for environmental reason, national security, economic, we need to use more biofuels and ethanol and that means staying with that renewable fuel standard," said former U.S. Army General Wesley Clark.

Clark works for Growth Energy, a bipartisan group that travels the country supporting ethanol but he is a Hillary Clinton supporter.'

http://www.ourquadcities.com/news/former-us-general-discuses-future-of-ethanol-at-dnc
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2016 09:07 am
The ear of corn is fully in the tent.

'It’s easier for a company to buy an existing plant than it is to build a new one, Purdue’s Tyner said. With surplus fuel finding more a home in markets overseas, the industry is expanding demand beyond the mandates in the 2007 Renewable Fuel Standard law, which is giving producers more confidence to add capacity, he said.

Almost all of America’s gasoline is blended with 10 percent ethanol, according to the EIA.

“Even if the RFS were to go away, which is the worst case scenario, that doesn’t mean the demand for ethanol would go away,” Tyner said.'

http://www.agweb.com/article/ethanol-survivors-bid-on-failed-rival-as-demand-expands-blmg/
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » As Corn Devours U.S. Prairies, Greens Reconsider Biofuel Mandate
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.21 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:39:08