47
   

Brexit. Why do Brits want Out of the EU?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 7 Sep, 2016 02:54 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Anybody who studied economics knows that competition in products and services is what keeps prices within reason. Today, it's a world economy, and there's no turning back from that reality/fact.
georgeob1
 
  1  
Wed 7 Sep, 2016 06:21 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Then why do you favor socialist systems for health care?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 7 Sep, 2016 07:50 pm
@georgeob1,
Because a healthy citizenry helps everybody. Have you seen the conditions in some third world countries? China is now a basket case, and they have one of the largest populations for a country. There's no way for them to clean up the mess that now exists. China also has many multi-millionaires. Their environment is killing everybody.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/18/china-air-pollution-far-worse-than-thought-study.html

China Population 2016

1,383,321,300
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Wed 7 Sep, 2016 10:20 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
Then why do you favor socialist systems for health care?
The NHS was introduced in the UK long before they joined the EU.
It is, however, one of those unresolved facts, what will happen to the "European Health Insurance Card" (anyone who is insured by or covered by a statutory social security scheme of the EEA countries and Switzerland to receive medical treatment in another member state free or at a reduced cost) for people in the UK.
Setanta
 
  2  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 12:56 am
Nye Bevan, Health Minister in Atlee's government agitated for a free point of need health care system for all Britons, which was brought in in 1948. There were calls for such a system (under the Poor Laws) as early as 1910.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 01:28 am
@Setanta,
The Poor Law of 1601 ("Act for the Relief of the Poor") already showed some significant parts of a "socialised health care" (similar to what happened in guilds in various German countries).

The National Insurance Act 1911 followed partly the various insurance laws first introduced by Bismarck in Germany. (After visiting Germany in 1908, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, David Lloyd George, wanted to get Great Britain "in this field on a level with Germany" [for more see >here<])
0 Replies
 
saab
 
  1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 02:36 am
@Walter Hinteler,
If you as a German need a doctor or dentist in Sweden you have to pay out of
your own pocket.
Your health insurance will pay back what it costs in Germany - the rest you will get from your travel insurance.
If a visit costs SEK 800 = Euro 80 you will get back Euro 20 from your health insurance. If you are insured privetly I do not know.
On the other hand I am not even sure the Swedes know what it costs as I have seen different prices for about the same thing.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 03:28 am
@saab,
saab wrote:
If you as a German need a doctor or dentist in Sweden you have to pay out of
your own pocket.
Not during short stays/holidays, and when you're not employed in Sweden - you only pay those 200,- SEK for the first visit. (But it's rather adventures for foreign students to get insured via the Försäkringskassan.)
saab
 
  0  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 03:35 am
@Walter Hinteler,
On vacation in Sweden you do have to pay yourself and you do get it back from your German or other foreign health insurance. In Germany the amount it costs in Germany.
How often have you as a tourist been to a doctor or dentist abroad?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 03:46 am
@saab,
Well, the in-laws go there regularily, twice per year on holidays. BIL goes quite often there to the doctors - his Swedish doctor even has access to the German data via the chip on the card. (Though he's a manager of a private insurance company, he and the family are mandatory insured.)
Quote:

... you visit the nearest hospital clinic ("Närakut", "Akutmottagning" or "Vårdcentral"), taking your passport and European Health Insurance (EHIC) with you or you will be charged the full cost of the treatment. With an EHIC, you will still have to pay part of the cost, which is not refundable. You will also have to pay the full cost of dental treatment up to a fixed limit, and most of the cost above this limit. Any reductions will be made before you get your bill
. Source: Official Swedish Tourism website via Swedish Embassy Berlin
saab
 
  1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 04:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I have taken passport and EHIC and gone to different Vårdcentralen and so far it has never worked out. I am not the only one who has run into trouble.
As a matter of fact: No dentist takes you in case you have a acute problem.
You have to go to Folktandvården. (which is a People´s toothclinic) and you have to go where it is open for acute dental problems that day. It might be in another town even.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 04:57 am
Quote:
Britain should start talks to leave the European Union as soon as possible, European Council President Donald Tusk said on Thursday, adding weight to calls for Prime Minister Theresa May to start the formal divorce procedure.

In London, Tusk met May for their first head-to-head meeting since Britain voted to leave the bloc in a referendum on June 23 which led to the resignation of her predecessor David Cameron. Tusk and May are keen to discuss what steps might be taken over the next few months, officials said.

May has said Britain will not trigger Article 50 of the EU's Lisbon Treaty to start the exit procedure this year to give her government time to come up with a negotiating stance for the complicated talks that will shape the country's future standing.

"Our goal (is) to establish closest possible EU-UK relations. Ball in UK court to start negotiations. In everybody's best interest to start ASAP (as soon as possible)," Tusk said on Twitter.

As head of the European Council, which groups heads of EU states and governments, Tusk leads the body that defines the bloc's political direction and priorities.
[...]
On Wednesday, May's spokeswoman said the meeting with Tusk would not only cover Britain's exit, or "Brexit", but would also discuss issues on the agenda for the October meeting of EU leaders, suggesting that Britain still plans to play a role.

May has said she will not show her hand before starting the Brexit talks, giving few details of what her government wants when it leaves the EU.

She says reducing immigration into Britain is crucial after millions of Britons expressed their frustration in the vote over what they say is the stress on schools, hospitals and housing from high numbers of people settling in the country.

But May, a former interior minister who was in charge of the ruling Conservative Party's immigration policy, also says she wants the best trade deal for Britain, refusing to say whether the country will remain in the EU's lucrative single market.
Source: reuters
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 09:09 am
@Walter Hinteler,
The former prime minister of Belgium, Guy Verhofstadt,who leads the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the EU-parliament, will lead Brexit negotiations for the European Parliament. (The European Parliament will need to approve a possible agreement on the conditions for the UK's departure from the EU.)

Verhofstadt will team up with Michel Barnier, who is leading negotiations for the European Commission.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 11:57 am
@Walter Hinteler,
British expats challenge EU head over claim he banned negotiations with UK over Brexit
Quote:
The European commission president, Jean-Claude Juncker, is facing a legal challenge from British expatriates who claim his ban on EU officials negotiating with the UK over Brexit is illegal.

The organisation Fair Deal for Expats is planning to launch its action at the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg in an attempt to bolster Britain’s bargaining position in preliminary political discussions over withdrawal.

Several days after the 23 June referendum result, Juncker announced that he was making a “presidential order” that there should be no negotiations with the UK until Article 50 – formally signalling Britain’s intention to withdraw – has been triggered.

By forcing the UK to wait until it has pressed the button on Article 50, many believe Juncker has restricted its room for diplomatic manoeuvre.
[...]

The European Union has dismissed the challenge, saying that the decision not to negotiate until Article 50 has been triggered is an agreement between the other 27 remaining EU states.

Fair Deal for Expats is also intervening in the forthcoming judicial review in London, due to take place in October, which is seeking to give parliament – as opposed to the prime minister – sole authority to trigger Article 50.
[...]
Patrick Green QC and Henry Warwick, barristers working on the claim, will argue that there is no such thing as a “presidential order” and that either it has no legal force to stop commission staff entering into talks or else it is an abuse of Juncker’s powers.
[...]
The EU commission has claimed, according to Fair Deal for Expats, that the Juncker statement has been mistranslated. Juncker’s use of the phrase “presidential order” has also been described as a loose figure of speech.

A statement issued by the European commission said: “President Juncker, the rresident of the European council Donald Tusk, the European parliament president Martin Schulz, and a series of national leaders have all made clear that the legal ground for exiting the EU is Article 50 of the Treaty and that negotiations begin after that is triggered. President Juncker has instructed commissioners and EC officials also to follow that principle.” Juncker’s comments were only intended to bind commission officials not other EU member states.


[Fair Deal for Expats = (mainly) British expats living in France, who are campaigning since June under this name: They want to represent the interests of an estimated 1.3 million UK citizens living and working in the EU and to be an umbrella for other expat associations with similar objectives.]
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  -1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 01:30 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Foofie wrote:
And, if Britain did not leave the EU, it might just be a matter of time before they weren't Brits. Britain survived WWII, WWI to melt into continental self-indulgence? Too sad, if that happened.
So the UK's 43-year membership of the EU (plus at least two more after triggering article 50) is just the limit before losing the British status?


The culture would eventually, in my opinion, be watered down, as young people take jobs on the continent and return with a different mindset, what I don't know; but, Sherlock Holmes only made sense as a British character, regardless of the good detective novels in France and Germany.
Foofie
 
  -1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 01:33 pm
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

Foofie wrote:
Britain survived WWII, WWI to melt into continental self-indulgence? Too sad, if that happened.

What an amazing piece of nonsense.



There are many nonsensical beliefs that the masses subscribe to. It's all about being comfortable with the status quo (aka, with what one is familiar). Your opinion is just a subjective truth; no one claims my opinion is an objective truth.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 01:44 pm
It seems that socialized medicine in the EU is overlapping another modern belief, that being that EU Europeans can live lives that in a small way mimic the lives of a prior centuries "rich." Meaning, vacations were once the sole property of the wealthy. Sort of like how "romance" was once the sole domain of the aristocracy, until the masses decided to mimic the aristocracy. That seems to be the desire of Europeans today to some extent. Utilize socialism to mimic the lifestyle of what was once the exclusive domain of the wealthy: travel and not worry about any medical bills needed while on holiday. Naturally, in the 19th century, the wealthy never had such discussions, since it was in poor taste to discuss such matters (money being that "filthy lucre").
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 01:45 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
The culture would eventually, in my opinion, be watered down, as young people take jobs on the continent and return with a different mindset, what I don't know;
And why, do you think, such would start now and not 10, 20, 30 or 40 years ago? And what about the hundred thousands of more senior UK-citizens living and working in continental Europe?
Foofie
 
  1  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 02:40 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Foofie wrote:
The culture would eventually, in my opinion, be watered down, as young people take jobs on the continent and return with a different mindset, what I don't know;
And why, do you think, such would start now and not 10, 20, 30 or 40 years ago? And what about the hundred thousands of more senior UK-citizens living and working in continental Europe?


In my opinion, Britain staying in the EU would just hasten that process of diluting a British identity. Sort of like a snowball rolling downhill. You have to give a little credence that being born and raised In New York City, in a time when New York City had a certain anglophile orientation, if not most of the U.S., Britain does give a certain continuity of identity to many Americans. At least those Americans that went to public school where much world history is about England, France and Spain. And, I might be wrong, but England always seemed to be the "good guys." Sort of like the cowboys in an American western were the "good guys." Sorry if I seem a little brainwashed, but I am a product of this culture. Perhaps, this might not seem incongruous when one remembers that Episcopaleanism is just the American version of Anglicanism, and Episcopaleans are one of the wealthy classes in the U.S. I think a disproportionate number of American Presidents were Episcopaleans, or at least WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants).
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  3  
Thu 8 Sep, 2016 03:42 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
The culture

That 'culture' vanished decades ago, if it ever truly existed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 10:58:30