@Tryagain,
Already in the late Middle Ages, Switzerland went its own way by disempowering the nobility and becoming a republic in which the people governed themselves.
Then the Battle of Marignano was formative: in 1515 the Old Confederation suffered a devastating defeat against the French in Lombardy. The lesson was to abandon any great power airs and henceforth to stay out of "foreign affairs". This led to strict neutrality. It was not until 2002 that the country joined the United Nations.
Thus, Switzerland was and still is unique: in the heart of the continent, closely connected with the cultural areas surrounding it [25% of the inhabitants of Switzerland are EU-citizens] - and yet standing on the fringes, always striving for separation.
Not least to protect its idiosyncratic political system, direct democracy.
However:
admittedly, the Swiss government has no plan on how to proceed. But that is not so bad, they say in Bern. The EU needs Switzerland, just as Switzerland needs the EU. Brussels will not react so maliciously. This was said on the day that the Swiss medical technology industry lost its barrier-free access to the European market. The various agreements with Switzerland will not be terminated, but they will expire.
The people, who according to the polls are in favour of the negotiated framework agreement, are not allowed to have a say in this fateful question (dozens of cantonal/national referendums have been organised . And neither does parliament. For almost three years, the Federal Council (the seven-member executive council that constitutes the federal government of the Swiss Confederation and serves as the collective head of state and government of Switzerland) had avoided a decision - and now only decided that it does not want to negotiate (with a 4:3 vote).