@layman,
Quote:you are discussing the comments made in the thread, to some degree, at least. So, what's up with that?
A good question. I don't know what the answer is. I suppose I am interested in moral riddles. I have recalled something that happened just after 9/11 when I worked in a very busy government mailroom. We were already on the alert for suspicious packages that might contain bombs, but a new category was announced: anthrax. A big meeting of all staff was called, and the procedure outlined: packs of rubber gloves everywhere, anyone finding a package containing "white powder" was to announce the fact loudly, and would immediately be isolated with the package - all other staff were to move at least 20 feet away, and if possible leave the room and shut the isolated person in. Then a specialist hazard team would be called. The only exception to the isolation was that one person might care to volunteer to stay with the finder. A certain person, at this point, announced that she would definitely volunteer because "That's the kind of person I am". This caused a certain amount of muttering and "Like hell it is" could be clearly heard. She was well known around the place for tipping management off about minor staff infractions e.g. arriving slightly late or leaving early, taking pens home, etc. (They told her to stop doing it).
I suppose I feel that however people might answer such a riddle, in real life people don't behave either 100% morally or 100% rationally. Often they freeze.