1
   

Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)

 
 
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 08:55 am
I say this is a quasi-serious topic because it is really just a debate on teh value of a science-fiction theory.

Anyways. I had an ex who was terrified by aliens. She couldn't sleep if the window was open because she would fear that some gray humanoid would try to abduct her. She knew it was unrealistic, but fear is often like that. She couldn't control her fear.

I presented her with my theory (ie: story) on 'aliens':

Earth is a speck. No... not a speck. Earth aspires to be a speck. Our solar system is a speck.

From anywhere else in the galaxy, Sol is an unremarkable dot. Not unlike the many many other dots of the same size and shape and chemical makeup.

We sent a Voyager out past Saturn and told it to turn around for a moment and try to detect life here on Earth. It couldn't.

Now if we assume that an alien life in another system is out there looking for life, the chance that they happen to be looking *this* way is slim at any given moment. The chance that they can actually detect us is even slimmer. Add to that the difficulty in getting here once they detect us? Pitifully slim.

Now let's look at the so-called "grays". Bipedal humanoids with two eyes, a mouth below 'em. jointed arms with elbows. Jointed legs with feet and knees.

Let's assume that life does exist on another planet not too terribly far away. The odds that this life would not only be intelligent, but have remarkably similar body structures to our own?! Now we're just talkin' crazy.

Okay, but there's this. Evolution. Nobody (who likes science) argues it happens. Take humans. Put 'em in space for generations upon generations (the duration it takes to traverse long distances out there for example). We'd be breeding, and presumably still evolving. But rather than evolving to Earth-like conditions, we'd evolve to ones in space.

Low light, microgravity, enclosed spaces, controlled environment, processed food... What might a human evolve to out there?

Well... Big eyes might help us see in the spanse between stars. Artificial lights don't compete with the sun.

Don't need big ears. The furthest you need to hear is across the room or down the hall.

Don't need much for teeth. Food all pre-processed. no hunting.

Don't need much for muscles. Microgravity an' all. machinery to do any drudgery.

Don't need pigment. No sunlight.

In short, these "grays" are humans. Distant relatives. Perhaps they are our decendants coming back from the future* and visiting places where notable events occurred in their past (such as nuclear detonations). Would evolved humans look at us and think us beneath them? Enough so that they would not have moral issues with performing studies on us? Scooping out our bowels to see what we eat and how we live? Tracking us to see our progress?

Or perhaps we have common ancestors? Maybe some primates were taken off Earth and evolved in space?

In any case, it seems to me that a genetic relationship is the only explanation for humanoid visitors so interested in us who happen to be here to see us.

And that's the end of my story, maybe I'll write a novel based on it. Smile

I guess what I'd like most is for you to tell me the holes in my 'theory'.

*note: I don't believe in 'time' so I don't consider time travel possible.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,081 • Replies: 35
No top replies

 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:19 am
Re: Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)
limbodog wrote:
I say this is a quasi-serious topic because it is really just a debate on teh value of a science-fiction theory.

Anyways. I had an ex who was terrified by aliens. She couldn't sleep if the window was open because she would fear that some gray humanoid would try to abduct her. She knew it was unrealistic, but fear is often like that. She couldn't control her fear.

I presented her with my theory (ie: story) on 'aliens':

Earth is a speck. No... not a speck. Earth aspires to be a speck. Our solar system is a speck.

From anywhere else in the galaxy, Sol is an unremarkable dot. Not unlike the many many other dots of the same size and shape and chemical makeup.


good start

Quote:
We sent a Voyager out past Saturn and told it to turn around for a moment and try to detect life here on Earth. It couldn't.

Now if we assume that an alien life in another system is out there looking for life, the chance that they happen to be looking *this* way is slim at any given moment. The chance that they can actually detect us is even slimmer. Add to that the difficulty in getting here once they detect us? Pitifully slim.


you could also use this to argue how many other alien races must exist Razz also, i bet we could detect life here now if we did the same test

Quote:
Now let's look at the so-called "grays". Bipedal humanoids with two eyes, a mouth below 'em. jointed arms with elbows. Jointed legs with feet and knees.

Let's assume that life does exist on another planet not too terribly far away. The odds that this life would not only be intelligent, but have remarkably similar body structures to our own?! Now we're just talkin' crazy.


it is not crazy. we dont have much data on evolution in other environments, jsut what we see on our planet. it may be the case that advanced life is capable of evolving in completely different circumstances than Earth. it also may be the case that advanced life only tends to evolve in circumstances similar to our own planets. even though evolution works on random changes, there is a disticnt possibility that it would follow similar paths on another planet because the goal of survival is still the same and many of the same traits will be selected for because they are universally beneficial. so I would not be surprised if other advanced life was bipedal...a bipedal form is much more suited to having an intelligent mind than a multi-legged creature because it would be more suited to manipulating and creatign things with it's hands, and physical adeptness is not so important in advanced intellectual creatures.

Quote:
Okay, but there's this. Evolution. Nobody (who likes science) argues it happens. Take humans. Put 'em in space for generations upon generations (the duration it takes to traverse long distances out there for example). We'd be breeding, and presumably still evolving. But rather than evolving to Earth-like conditions, we'd evolve to ones in space.

Low light, microgravity, enclosed spaces, controlled environment, processed food... What might a human evolve to out there?

Well... Big eyes might help us see in the spanse between stars. Artificial lights don't compete with the sun.


ok, now you are startign to get crazy. people cannot survive in space. perhaps there is an organism that can survive in space, but i highly doubt it...if there were, they would most likely occur only in specific areas like nebulas or something. there is not enoguh resources in open space, hence the name "space". and the pressure is so low that a human would explode, even if they could survive without an energy source for the brain (like oxygen).


Quote:

Don't need big ears. The furthest you need to hear is across the room or down the hall.

Don't need much for teeth. Food all pre-processed. no hunting.

Don't need much for muscles. Microgravity an' all. machinery to do any drudgery.

Don't need pigment. No sunlight.


not sure what your'e talking about.

Quote:

In short, these "grays" are humans. Distant relatives. Perhaps they are our decendants coming back from the future* and visiting places where notable events occurred in their past (such as nuclear detonations). Would evolved humans look at us and think us beneath them? Enough so that they would not have moral issues with performing studies on us? Scooping out our bowels to see what we eat and how we live? Tracking us to see our progress?


completely unsupported thesis

Quote:

Or perhaps we have common ancestors? Maybe some primates were taken off Earth and evolved in space?


you talk as if there is only one species of aliens. given the size of the universe that we know of (which is likely only a fraction of the actual universe), there is most likely many, many species of aliens. most of them would also not be super-intelligent, either.

Quote:

In any case, it seems to me that a genetic relationship is the only explanation for humanoid visitors so interested in us who happen to be here to see us.


there is no evidence that aliens have ever visited our planet...?

Quote:

*note: I don't believe in 'time' so I don't consider time travel possible.


completelty different subject here. if you do not believe in time, you simply do not understand the definitino of time. because to disbelieve time is like saying you don't believe that anything exists. and we know that we exist, so, you're wrong.

time travel is possible. time is just a dimension which merely means it is used to classify our position. "space travel" is possible because objects can change their position. "time travel" is possible because objects can exist at different states at different points in time. time travel is also not uniform, relatively has shown that matter can travel through time at different speeds. backwards time travel is certainly impossible, however, at least in the sense that you describe it. since everyones time is relative to themself, if backwards time travel WERE possible, it would not affect anything else in the universe, only the object that went back in time, so you could not, for instance, have people from the future visit people from the past. but you could, for instance, visit the past. however, this is not really possible because it is not possible to go backwards in time by definition.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:22 am
Limbo, it is possible that a technological civilization could detect our presence. They could intercept the television signals which are beaming out into eternity. They are almost 70 years out by now. The first signal they'll pick up is the broadcast of Hitler opening the 1936 Olympic games in Munich.



Hmmmmm . . .
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:24 am
Bush is terrified by aliens. That's why he wants to tighten the borders. But seriously...if that were my ex, I would have got great pleasure (while we were together) out of dressing up like a gray, climbing through the window and waking her up with a rousing "It's anal probe time baby!"
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:25 am
:0

cav you got to stop hanging out with slappy
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:26 am
Setanta wrote:
Limbo, it is possible that a technological civilization could detect our presence. They could intercept the television signals which are beaming out into eternity. They are almost 70 years out by now. The first signal they'll pick up is the broadcast of Hitler opening the 1936 Olympic games in Munich.



Hmmmmm . . .


This would support the pretense of the Star Trek episode, original series, where they landed on a planet modelled after Nazi Germany.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:43 am
What about the one where they landed on a planet run by the Roman Empire?

After NBC got their hands on creative control on that series, wardrobe became the dominant factor in scripting the episodes--hence, gangsters, cowboys, gladiators, storm troopers . . .
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:44 am
Quote:
This would support the pretense of the Star Trek episode, original series, where they landed on a planet modelled after Nazi Germany.


hehe, yeah, seen that. they've also done numerous episodes where they land in planets where there are country western scenes. this is a theme that goes thorugh al star treks.
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:48 am
Re: Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)
stuh505 wrote:
you could also use this to argue how many other alien races must exist Razz also, i bet we could detect life here now if we did the same test


At Saturn? Yes, probably. But think how much further a way another star is compared to Saturn.

stuh505 wrote:
it is not crazy. we dont have much data on evolution in other environments, jsut what we see on our planet. it may be the case that advanced life is capable of evolving in completely different circumstances than Earth. it also may be the case that advanced life only tends to evolve in circumstances similar to our own planets. even though evolution works on random changes, there is a disticnt possibility that it would follow similar paths on another planet because the goal of survival is still the same and many of the same traits will be selected for because they are universally beneficial. so I would not be surprised if other advanced life was bipedal...a bipedal form is much more suited to having an intelligent mind than a multi-legged creature because it would be more suited to manipulating and creatign things with it's hands, and physical adeptness is not so important in advanced intellectual creatures.


if manipulating limbs = good push for intelligence than it would just as happily promote intelligent starfish or intelligent centipedes or intelligent octopi (which I hear are kinda smart). There's not much of a reason to believe intelligence only comes in creatures with knees.

stuh505 wrote:
ok, now you are startign to get crazy. people cannot survive in space. perhaps there is an organism that can survive in space, but i highly doubt it...if there were, they would most likely occur only in specific areas like nebulas or something. there is not enoguh resources in open space, hence the name "space". and the pressure is so low that a human would explode, even if they could survive without an energy source for the brain (like oxygen).


Uh... Sorry, thought spaceships were a given.

stuh505 wrote:
not sure what your'e talking about.


If you're in a spaceship travelling through teh vast gaps between stars, you're living in a controlled environment. The survival adaptations could atrophy and it wouldn't interfere with your chances at breeding. They just aren't needed.

stuh505 wrote:
completely unsupported thesis


I thought I supported it. But again, it is science fiction, not an attempt at explaining the origination of something I don't think exists.

stuh505 wrote:
you talk as if there is only one species of aliens. given the size of the universe that we know of (which is likely only a fraction of the actual universe), there is most likely many, many species of aliens. most of them would also not be super-intelligent, either.


Because I'm referring to the stories of alien visitors which are called "grays" in the folklore and stories of "abductees".

stuh505 wrote:
there is no evidence that aliens have ever visited our planet...?


Are you asking me? Or agreeing with me?

stuh505 wrote:
completelty different subject here. if you do not believe in time, you simply do not understand the definitino of time. because to disbelieve time is like saying you don't believe that anything exists. and we know that we exist, so, you're wrong.


Different subject but related to the comment I marked. And disagreeing with you does not make me wrong.

stuh505 wrote:
time travel is possible. [snip]


As you said, another subject. And one with an existing thread. Smile
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:49 am
Setanta wrote:
Limbo, it is possible that a technological civilization could detect our presence. They could intercept the television signals which are beaming out into eternity. They are almost 70 years out by now. The first signal they'll pick up is the broadcast of Hitler opening the 1936 Olympic games in Munich.

Hmmmmm . . .


Those signals have traveled how far now? To Alpha Centauri? One star?

And supposedly we've been getting these visitors since the 50's right?
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:50 am
cavfancier wrote:
This would support the pretense of the Star Trek episode, original series, where they landed on a planet modelled after Nazi Germany.



Oh yah! I remember that one!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:51 am
Absolutely true about Trek. Now, consider this. Eventually, should aliens pick up our television signals, they will come across these Trek episodes, and that in itself could possibly influence them to fashion themselves after the Roman Empire, or the old west, or whatever. But, they would only have a fragmented, uninformed interepertation of these models of history. Star Trek could become it's own self-fulfilling prophecy. Hmmm.....
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:51 am
I don't for a moment believe we've had "alien visitations"--apart from the sudden and inexplicable appearance of the Bush family, of course.


Anyway, this is less important than the truth from you Limbo. If yer a dog, how come you got a cat for an avatar, Hmm?
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:52 am
cavfancier wrote:
Absolutely true about Trek. Now, consider this. Eventually, should aliens pick up our television signals, they will come across these Trek episodes, and that in itself could possibly influence them to fashion themselves after the Roman Empire, or the old west, or whatever. But, they would only have a fragmented, uninformed interepertation of these models of history. Star Trek could become it's own self-fulfilling prophecy. Hmmm.....


Didn't they make *that* into a movie too? Starring Tim Allen?
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:54 am
Setanta wrote:
I don't for a moment believe we've had "alien visitations"--apart from the sudden and inexplicable appearance of the Bush family, of course.


Nor do I. But it helped my ex get over her fears. She says she can sleep with the window open now. Apparently freaky human spacemen are not as scary.

Setanta wrote:
Anyway, this is less important than the truth from you Limbo. If yer a dog, how come you got a cat for an avatar, Hmm?


There's a bit of a tale behind that answer.... (pun intended)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:57 am
Puss in Boots, à la Hollywood . . . i'll tell, ya . . . its more than a learning-no-new-tricks old dog such as i am can understand . . .
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 10:01 am
Who is this 'Tim Allen' you speak of? I certainly hope that Trek gets to the aliens before 'Tool Time' or 'The Santa Clause'.

Stuh, it's not that I hang out with Slappy, I just can't get him out of my yard.
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 12:54 pm
cavfancier wrote:
Who is this 'Tim Allen' you speak of? I certainly hope that Trek gets to the aliens before 'Tool Time' or 'The Santa Clause'.

Stuh, it's not that I hang out with Slappy, I just can't get him out of my yard.
Galaxy Quest
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Jul, 2004 09:23 pm
Re: Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)
Quote:
limbodog wrote:
stuh505 wrote:
you could also use this to argue how many other alien races must exist Razz also, i bet we could detect life here now if we did the same test


At Saturn? Yes, probably. But think how much further a way another star is compared to Saturn.


what? I did not mention Saturn. Saturn is HARDLY hospitable. You'd have more luck finding it on Europa. I never implied that aliens exist within our solar system.

Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
it is not crazy. we dont have much data on evolution in other environments, jsut what we see on our planet. it may be the case that advanced life is capable of evolving in completely different circumstances than Earth. it also may be the case that advanced life only tends to evolve in circumstances similar to our own planets. even though evolution works on random changes, there is a disticnt possibility that it would follow similar paths on another planet because the goal of survival is still the same and many of the same traits will be selected for because they are universally beneficial. so I would not be surprised if other advanced life was bipedal...a bipedal form is much more suited to having an intelligent mind than a multi-legged creature because it would be more suited to manipulating and creatign things with it's hands, and physical adeptness is not so important in advanced intellectual creatures.


if manipulating limbs = good push for intelligence than it would just as happily promote intelligent starfish or intelligent centipedes or intelligent octopi (which I hear are kinda smart). There's not much of a reason to believe intelligence only comes in creatures with knees.


No, this makes no sense. I thought it was obvious, but I will explain why the bipedal form makes sense because I guess it's not. An organism that was extremely intelligent (like humans) would not need to rely so much on the ability to run fast to catch prey, or fight well to defend itself against dangerous animals, because it could use it's cunning to outwit the animals...like we do. We use technology and traps etc to outsmart animals even though we could not beat them physically. Our bipedal form allows us to maintian balance while manipulating objects with our hands, and our 5 fingers allows us to control objects with greater precision. Our intelligence is much less useful if we lack the physical capability to manipulate tools. This is why intelligence encourages the bipedal form.

Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
ok, now you are startign to get crazy. people cannot survive in space. perhaps there is an organism that can survive in space, but i highly doubt it...if there were, they would most likely occur only in specific areas like nebulas or something. there is not enoguh resources in open space, hence the name "space". and the pressure is so low that a human would explode, even if they could survive without an energy source for the brain (like oxygen).


Uh... Sorry, thought spaceships were a given.


sorry, it wasnt obvious to me. i am quite literal.

Quote:

stuh505 wrote:
not sure what your'e talking about.


If you're in a spaceship travelling through teh vast gaps between stars, you're living in a controlled environment. The survival adaptations could atrophy and it wouldn't interfere with your chances at breeding. They just aren't needed.


Yes, it would take millions or billions of years to travel between many planets. I suppose it would be possible for some alien race to construct a giant spaceship capable of taking a large enough group of aliens that evolution could take place...although what you would see is more likely de-evolution, in other words, where you remove selective pressure so no traits are selected for and this just increases the diversity of the species. But I think the technical implications of such a venture are implausible; how would they reliably get energy and food for the ship and crew over this time period taking billions of years in which they travel through unknown areas of space? It seems there only hope would be to harvest what they could off of asteroids but they are largely devoid of consumable energy sources.

Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
completely unsupported thesis


I thought I supported it. But again, it is science fiction, not an attempt at explaining the origination of something I don't think exists.


wasn't your entire point, to try to look at this from a NON fiction perspective to convince your wife that aliens would not visit?

Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
you talk as if there is only one species of aliens. given the size of the universe that we know of (which is likely only a fraction of the actual universe), there is most likely many, many species of aliens. most of them would also not be super-intelligent, either.


Because I'm referring to the stories of alien visitors which are called "grays" in the folklore and stories of "abductees".


haven't heard that terminology before...then again, i'm not the type to make conversation in secluded diners in the nevada desert. i do live around a lot of farmers, though.

Quote:

stuh505 wrote:
there is no evidence that aliens have ever visited our planet...?


Are you asking me? Or agreeing with me?


i was wondering why you were speaking as if aliens had visited Earth in the past, when we already know that they have not...I thought you were trying to look at this from a logical perspective and merely analyze the feasibility of aliens visiting our planet in the near future.

Quote:
Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
completelty different subject here. if you do not believe in time, you simply do not understand the definitino of time. because to disbelieve time is like saying you don't believe that anything exists. and we know that we exist, so, you're wrong.


Different subject but related to the comment I marked. And disagreeing with you does not make me wrong.


the act of disagreeing with someone certainly does not make either person right or wrong. however, disagreeing with this particular topic does make you wrong...

Quote:
stuh505 wrote:
time travel is possible. [snip]


As you said, another subject. And one with an existing thread. Smile


then i shall not comment further
0 Replies
 
limbodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Jul, 2004 08:20 am
Re: Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)
stuh505 wrote:
what? I did not mention Saturn. Saturn is HARDLY hospitable. You'd have more luck finding it on Europa. I never implied that aliens exist within our solar system.


... Okay, I'm assuming you didn't really read my first post. The test we performed with Voyager occured at Saturn. (just past Saturn really). It turned around and looked at Earth from that distance and found no detectable signs of life. Yes, with our current technology we might be able to detect ourselves at that distance now, but as I stated, the spance between stars is vastly greater than the distance between Earth and Saturn.


stuh505 wrote:
No, this makes no sense. I thought it was obvious, but I will explain why the bipedal form makes sense because I guess it's not. An organism that was extremely intelligent (like humans) would not need to rely so much on the ability to run fast to catch prey, or fight well to defend itself against dangerous animals, because it could use it's cunning to outwit the animals...like we do. We use technology and traps etc to outsmart animals even though we could not beat them physically. Our bipedal form allows us to maintian balance while manipulating objects with our hands, and our 5 fingers allows us to control objects with greater precision. Our intelligence is much less useful if we lack the physical capability to manipulate tools. This is why intelligence encourages the bipedal form.


Not sure what to say to you here. Our bipedal form resulted from our decention from quadrupeds. Our quadrupedal ancestors resulted from their decention from marine life with four fins and a tail. etc. If we had evolved from a fish with 6 find and a tail we might look like centaurs now. Still perfectly capable of manipulating tools. Still reliant on our big brains. Etc. There is absolutely no reason to assume that life on another planet evolving completely independantly from ours would take the same or even a similar path. As I stated, they might decend from something like a starfish and have five delicate limbs which act as foot or hand as needed and still be capable of evolving a big brain. Or centipedes: 25 pairs of legs and two sets of arms. No reason that form couldn't evolve intelligence. And that's just basing guesses of terrestrial life. The sky is essentially the limit and only a lack of imagination would keep one grounded in the bilaterally symmetrical bipedal body form.

stuh505 wrote:
Yes, it would take millions or billions of years to travel between many planets. I suppose it would be possible for some alien race to construct a giant spaceship capable of taking a large enough group of aliens that evolution could take place...


Evolution works faster in smaller populations not larger ones.

stuh505 wrote:
although what you would see is more likely de-evolution, in other words, where you remove selective pressure so no traits are selected for and this just increases the diversity of the species.


Unless reproduction is asexual, the selection process would be ongoing. Natural selection doesn't require your death by outside influences, it just requires you get laid. And there really is no such thing as "de-evolution". Evolution does not have a goal, it just progresses. Losing traits that are no longer needed is just as much a part of evolution as developing new traits that benefit one in a given environment.

stuh505 wrote:
But I think the technical implications of such a venture are implausible;


From our perspective, maybe.

stuh505 wrote:
how would they reliably get energy

Bussard Ramjet? Extremely efficient use of energy? Biothermal energy? Who knows? We're still burning poop for fuel on parts of our planet, we're not in a position to say what energy sources might be available to our own technology even a mere 100 years from now.

stuh505 wrote:
and food for the ship


That's the easy part. We could do that now if we wanted to.

stuh505 wrote:
and crew over this time period taking billions of years in which they travel through unknown areas of space?


If you've got the energy source, the rest just falls into place.

stuh505 wrote:
It seems there only hope would be to harvest what they could off of asteroids but they are largely devoid of consumable energy sources.


Hydrogen. There's plenty of it out there.

stuh505 wrote:
wasn't your entire point, to try to look at this from a NON fiction perspective to convince your wife that aliens would not visit?


Ex-girlfriend. But that's close enough.

stuh505 wrote:
haven't heard that terminology before...then again, i'm not the type to make conversation in secluded diners in the nevada desert. i do live around a lot of farmers, though.


Books. I read lots of 'em. Plenty of sci-fi too. And farmers scare me more than aliens. Smile

stuh505 wrote:
i was wondering why you were speaking as if aliens had visited Earth in the past, when we already know that they have not...I thought you were trying to look at this from a logical perspective and merely analyze the feasibility of aliens visiting our planet in the near future.


We don't *know* that. We just are convinced of it because the evidence strongly suggests they have not. I posted it here because I wanted to find any big gaping holes I overlooked in my aliens=humans story. As it is based off a rather common folklore I figured most people would be able to relate.

stuh505 wrote:
the act of disagreeing with someone certainly does not make either person right or wrong. however, disagreeing with this particular topic does make you wrong...


Very Happy You're funny!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Aliens (a quasi-serious topic)
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2025 at 03:27:10