1
   

Fear and Love

 
 
agrote
 
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 05:05 pm
If you've seen the film Donnie Darko, you'll have laughed at the course the schoolkids are made to take on 'attitudinal beliefs,' where they are taught to avoid being "prisoners of their own fear," and told to see everything in terms of "fear" and "love".

But it's not made up! Those courses are frighteningly real! I just came across a website by somebody called Lee Jampolsky, and he says,

Quote:
Attitudinal Healing is based on three simple truths:
1. There are really only two emotions: love and fear.
2. There is really only one problem: the belief that you are separate from God, humanity, and nature.
3. There is really only one solution: discovering that the essence of your being is love.


People actually believe that crap! I'm thinking of number 1 mainly. I mean I suppose it depends on what kind of approach you take to emotion - maybe fear and love are supposed to be general categories which encompass a whole range of emotions, But you can just imagine what this Lee guy would put in the 'fear' category - maybe I should read the rest of his site before I make this assumption - but I bet he'd say lust is a product of fear, and things like shyness - all these self-help gurus think everybody needs to be really outgoing and sociable all the time, but what's wrong with beign a little shy? What's wrong with sitting at home and reading a book instead of going to that stupid party and putting on fake smiles all night?

There isn't really any point to this thread, but I'm sure somebody'll have something to say on something I've just blurted out. Or if not, nevermind...
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,125 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 11:09 am
Donnie Darko was a great film! Smile It leaves you with so much to think about.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:12 pm
Binary or tripartite divisions are typical of "psychological systems" which purport to account for "everything". Consider Hitlers "Aryan" versus "Non-Aryan" or Freuds "Id, Ego, Superego" from countless examples.
We seem to be genetically programmed to don these simplistic category spectacles in order to make order out of chaos, but we are blind to the fact that none of these categories hase meaning without its complementary categories.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:52 pm
fresco wrote:
Binary or tripartite divisions are typical of "psychological systems" which purport to account for "everything". Consider Hitlers "Aryan" versus "Non-Aryan" or Freuds "Id, Ego, Superego" from countless examples.
We seem to be genetically programmed to don these simplistic category spectacles in order to make order out of chaos, but we are blind to the fact that none of these categories hase meaning without its complementary categories.


I prefer the idea that there is a single spectrum of behavior, with no distinct categories at all.
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 01:01 pm
I just hate silly self-help gurus who want you to smile constantly. I like frowning, it makes me look intelligent. Mad
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Fear and Love
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 06:46:20