23
   

How do you define Time?

 
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2009 07:35 am
@InsertSomethingHere,
i define time as a measurement of energy.

it doesnt exist.


we make it exist. it exists as much as an "inch" exists.
only in our minds.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Feb, 2009 11:19 am
@OGIONIK,
Ogi, Pretty good! Sort of like E=T or T=E.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2009 09:56 pm
Time stands still, in that it has the opposite attributes of change, which it must be seen in contrast to to make any sense. Same as space. Oposite attributes of what it is the contrast to.

Time is simply a way to organize memory and predictions.

The movement of time, as represented by the movement of a clock is not a measurement of "temporal distance". It is the measurement of change, divided into intervals that are suitable for whatever time is applied to. In the case of the clock, its the changing of day to night and the cycle of the seasons we measure, and the intervals are set to match and mark special events in the unfolding change.

So if you want to measure the change of the world we percieve, the intervals are set to the turning of the earth, and it's progress in it's orbit around the sun. These are what the clock and the calendar represent.

If you wanted to measure the change in a piece of music you would need to adjust your time to intervals that were useful in describing the changes in a way that made sense.

So, time isn't something that allows change to happen. Change makes time, and sets the flow of it.
0 Replies
 
alexandriagis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 May, 2009 10:56 pm
@Tiaha,
time doesn't exist becuase time is a concept man made... if you think about it.. nothing exists.. or exists differently for everyone...
I don't know... maybe you have to take shrooms to grasp it
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 May, 2009 11:06 pm
Perhaps there is only change, changing, changes, etc. And time is only an abstraction, a way of measuring processes of change. Space is only distance between places, and distance may be conceptualized as the time taken/required (at certain speeds) to traverse some given space. In that sense time equals space and vice versa--or at least that's how it seems tonight.
solipsister
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 02:37 am
@JLNobody,
t= mc^2- e
0 Replies
 
lmossor
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jul, 2009 11:08 pm
If it wasn't for Time......Everything would happen at once
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 12:48 am
@lmossor,
happen? How do you define "happen"?
0 Replies
 
marcusmachiavelli
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 10:50 am
A large variety of devices have been invented to measure time. Time is not a reality (hypostasis), but a concept (noêma) or a measure (metron).
phoney
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 01:22 pm
Time is just a convenient human mechanism for visualizing transition.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Jul, 2009 02:47 pm
@marcusmachiavelli,
What is interesting about the measuring of time is that some cultures have built monuments to measure the number of days, hours, and minutes (and seconds today made exact by the atomic clock), that were built thousands of years ago that are very accurate. Calendars created by different cultures have different number of days and years.

It's true that time is a man-made concept, but the majority of humans follow its measurements in one form or another.

What's also interesting is that our body clock can often work to get us up in the morning.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 06:41 am
@cicerone imposter,
"Time flies, and the rest is lies." --Omar Khayyam.

"Time is an ocean and it ends at the shore" Bob Dylan.

I refer you all to Spengler's The Decline of the West, Chap. IV. Destiny and Causality.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 10:18 am
@spendius,
spendi wrote:
Quote:
I refer you all to Spengler's The Decline of the West, Chap. IV. Destiny and Causality.


Summarize it for us spendi.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 10:34 am
@cicerone imposter,
Speaking about time, I had the opportunity to visit Easter Island earlier this year. Our group visited the only inland lava rock statues, and I found this article on the web:
Quote:
Ahu Akivi is an especially sacred place.

Ahu Akivi is a sanctuary and celestial observatory built about 1500 AD which was the subject of the first serious restoration accomplished on Easter Island by archaeologists William Mulloy and Gonzalo Figueroa, with excellent results. As in the case of many religious structures on Easter Island, it has been situated with astronomical precision: it's seven statues look towards the point where the sun sets during the equinox.

It is also aligned to the moon.

Ahu Akivi is an unusual site in several respects. A low ahu supports 7 statues all very similar in height and style. The site is odd in that it is located far inland and the statues were erected to face the ocean. The only site where this was done. Like other Easter Island sites the statues were found knocked off the ahu, lying face down in the ground. In 1960, Archeologist William Mulloy's team spent several months raising the statues to their original positions.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 10:42 am
@cicerone imposter,
One of many pictures I took on Easter Island.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v97/imposter222/IMG_1667.jpg
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 12:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Summarize it for us spendi.


I suppose you mean some easily digestible sound bite ci. to take its place in your noggin next to all the millions of other absurdly oversimplified and disconnected gobbets of drivel that already live there.

No chance. Spengler is stripped down as lean as lean gets. I gave the reference. If you are interested go look it up and knock off expecting to be spoon fed.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 12:46 pm
@spendius,
spendi, You just never learned to summarize anything in your life; most classic literature have been summarized. Spengler, I'm sure, is no exception.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 03:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
No literature can be summarized. I suppose you could summarize the train time table by saying it is a book which tells you the times trains arrive and depart.

Perhaps you have read too many summaries ci. As you say--Spengler has been summarized. All the summaries I have read were hope;essly inadequate.

I have a book about Easter Island. It's by Alfred Metraux.

There was nobody there when it was "discovered". I think the theory is that phallic cults self destruct. It's Madonna cults that blossom.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 03:34 pm
@spendius,
spendi, Go to any "classic literature synopsis" on the web, and you'll find thousands of entries. Even "spengler" will come up with this: http://www.shvoong.com/category-1/tags/spengler/
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Jul, 2009 05:08 pm
@cicerone imposter,
So?
 

Related Topics

Why does time not exist? - Discussion by edgarblythe
Putting Time In Perspective - Discussion by Olivier5
What happens when time stop? - Question by 5D
Time simply does not exist - Discussion by xxxx
The elusive NOW - Discussion by Rickoshay75
Time - Question by Genius600
simple relativity question - Question by ralphiep
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 4.33 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:11:26