Quote:And then there came the exploitation of this. Religions became organized, and people assumed power over others by controlling their beliefs. Whenever we think about religion today it is this form of religion; but it isn't true religion, it's a means of control and power.
True religion, as I see it, is the quest you undertake to return to the state we were in before the evolution of a sense of self. To return to the garden of eden without leaving anything that makes us human behind. To again experience the world with an animals unthinking presence, merely existing in harmony with everything, but with this new sense of self intact.
You're coming close to Spengler Cyr.
But the problem is "how" we might return to the Garden of Eden without leaving behind our human-ness. It sounds attractive. It's what religious ecstasy is. The psychological conditions for approaching that state are ceremonies, rituals, music, architecture, incense,(ahem), dreamy movement etc stopping short, usually, of orgies, and providing a way back out of it, and to arrive at that for everybody a vast organisation is required which, because it can only be staffed by humans, exhibits all the "flaws" humans are subject to.
You are holding out a temptation and are unable to deliver it.
The obvious fact of organised religion is scientific evidence of a yearning for the state you envisage. No yearning-no organised religion. A little like a wing is scientific evidence of a yearning, so to say, in an organism to exploit the air as a niche to get a living in. Or the underground vaults in our case.
And how do anti-religionists propose to address this mass yearning to transcend the lonely self?
Just as Darwin did, they lose the taste for music and art has no meaning for them. So they are concentrating on material possessions on the "I'm better than you" basis and that has no natural orgasmic end point which is to say the state of notself is not only unreachable but is driven out. They have got as far as making music and art nothing but a material possession with status hierarchies the main objective.
It is literally a head up arse and masturbation of the ego situation I'm afraid. Which must be why those phrases so readily come to mind as clinching arguments in the intellectual quivers of the anti-religionists.
Religare means to bind, to unify, to organise. And you are in danger of making religion itself a material possession dedicated to the glory of your own charisma.
Bernini depicted St. Theresa in the notself state.