@Quehoniaomath,
No frustration, on the contrary. You are behaving exactly how the archetypical hyper-skeptic would behave, according to my theory of them. Eg:
- you cannot prove any of your **** but are happy to proclaim it again and again, as if saying something was enough to make it true
- you don't even know what you are arguing for (eg no definition of when 'modern science' starts)
- you have no idea what sort of evidence would conradict your stance, or lack thereoff.
If you'd grow a brain, maybe you could surprise me, but so far you're just being a nice, predictable laboratory mousse.
I predict for instance that you will never state who according to you invented the personal computer (or fiber glass for that matter) and when.