georgeob1 wrote:
Perhaps we could refer the matter to the Belgians. They claimed that their courts had jurisdiction over all mankind. That, however did not prevent them from turning a blind eye to the grotesque situation developing a decade ago in their former Ruwandan colony.
The Belgian democratically elected parliament/government made such laws, which the courts follow.
Belgium's 1993 universal jurisdiction law, which permitted victims to file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad, had made Belgium a leader in the struggle for international justice.
However, by now (= since August last year) the Belgian law resembles that of other European countries.
Belgian courts have only jurisdiction over international crimes
- if the accused is Belgian or has his primary residence in Belgium,
- (o) if the victim is Belgian or has lived in Belgium for at least three years at the time the crimes were committed
- (or) if Belgium is required by treaty to exercise jurisdiction over the case.
The [new] law also considerably reduces victims' ability to obtain direct access to the courts - unless the accused is Belgian or has his primary residence in Belgium, the decision whether or not to proceed with any complaint rests entirely with the state prosecutor.
Belgium has thus restricted the reach of universal jurisdiction in its courts by adopting a law similar to or more restrictive than most European countries.