4
   

There are no black holes! Nowhere!!

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2014 07:25 am
Gee, Quahog, there's a whole new team of scientists who apparently never heard of your unilateral decision that black holes don't exist, so they went out and discovered ANOTHER one and even offered reasons why that's what it is. What gall on their part!!!! Don't they know that they should follow your example? All they have to do is declare something is so, and it is so? Why all this tedious recapitulation of evidence for it, when you've definitively, without needing any evidence at all, have declared they don't exist?

Quote:
Monster black hole found in tiny galaxy
Discovery hints at twice as many supermassive black holes in the nearby Universe as previously thought.


Matter falling into supermassive black holes can get so hot that it emits X-rays.
Astronomers have for the first time found strong evidence for a giant black hole in a Lilliputian galaxy. The finding suggests that supermassive black holes could be twice as numerous in the nearby Universe as previously estimated, with many of them hidden at the centres of small, seemingly nondescript galaxies known as ultra-compact dwarfs.




Anil Seth of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City and his colleagues report the findings on 17 September in Nature1. The team became intrigued by the ultra-compact dwarf galaxy M60-UCD1, some 16.6 million parsecs (54 million light years) from Earth, in part because its X-ray emissions suggested that it might house a black hole. Images taken with the Hubble Space Telescope showed that the galaxy harboured a high concentration of mass at its centre, but the team had no idea how heavy the putative black hole might be.

To weigh the beast, the researchers measured the velocity of stars whipping about the galaxy’s centre using an infrared spectrometer on the Gemini North telescope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii. The high velocity of the stars is best explained by a central black hole that tips the scales at 21 million times the Sun’s mass, concluded Seth’s team. That is more than five times heavier than the black hole at the centre of the Milky Way — even though M60-UCD1 has an estimated diameter of about one-six-hundredth that of our home galaxy.

And whereas supermassive black holes typically have about 0.5% of the mass of the stars that are concentrated in the centre of their galaxies, the black hole in M60-UCD1 is about 18% of the mass of the galaxy's stars, enabling the gravitational monster to wield a much greater influence over the galaxy’s shape and structure. Recognizing the dominant role that some supermassive black holes have in the evolution of small galaxies is the most important result of the study, says astronomer Karl Gebhardt of the University of Texas at Austin.

“This is a very strong confirmation that small galaxies can have big black holes,” Gebhardt says. “This is a new class of galaxy — and that’s very exciting.”

Hiding in plain sight
At its current size, M60-UCD1 lacks the heft to have assembled such a massive black hole, but the galaxy might once have been much bigger, suggest Seth and his collaborators. They speculate that a collision with an even larger neighbouring galaxy, M60, stripped the outer parts of M60-UCD1 more than two billion years ago, leaving behind a dense remnant — the ultra-compact dwarf and its now oversized black hole.



NASA/Space Telescope Science Institute/ESA

The ultracompact dwarf galaxy M60-UCD1 sits below the gargantuan galaxy M60 in this Hubble Space Telescope image.

Expand The team has begun to examine several other relatively nearby ultra-compact dwarf galaxies that might also host supermassive black holes. Because these dwarfs are just as common as the large galaxies in which supermassive black holes are typically found, the number of giant black holes in the Universe today might be double what researchers have estimated, Seth says.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15953
References
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2014 07:44 am
Come on, Quahog! We're counting on you, bro. Don't let us down. Show us you're right and they're wrong! Evidence, shmevidence, who needs evidence? Just say it and make it so, bro!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Physics of the Biblical Flood - Discussion by gungasnake
Suggest forum, physics - Question by dalehileman
The nature of space and time - Question by shanemcd3
I don't understand how this car works. - Discussion by DrewDad
An Embarassment to Science - Discussion by Leadfoot
Gravitational waves Discovered ! - Discussion by Fil Albuquerque
BICEP and now LIGO discover gravity waves - Discussion by farmerman
Transient fields - Question by puzzledperson
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/19/2020 at 04:14:14