LOL they are interfering with some of the most personal decisions that a woman can made along with her doctor and her partner all in the name of their religions beliefs and for that I have zero repeat zero tolerant of that kind of behaviors.
And I repeat LOL - they are NOT. They are saying that an employee cannot have an abortion -- they are saying we will not pay for insurance that covers this.
So it is fair to force this group to pay for things they do not believe in... you consider that tolerant? So you do not believe in their religion --- what if you were forced to pay for their church -- would you think that is fair?
It seems it is ok for you to dictate that someone pays for because you think it is morally ok. But if it were not morally ok to you, you should have to pay for it. Right you are tolerant. You really said it when you said you have zero tolerance. I proved my point -- you are intolerant but yet you expect others to be tolerant of what you believe in.
They obviously believe in the law (and so do the judges) thus why they brought it took court for them to decide -- they do not simply ignore the law. The law now determine they were correct and now that you do not like it -- you are stating they are against the law? You really have no logic. Again you in your belief can say it is ok to do something against the law, but yet when Hobby Lobby followed the law and rules of our court system and ended up with a verdict you did not like --- you are still right? And who is the nutcase?
And you think you make sense?
And as I said over and over (ie coal miners) this is not a safety issue -- safety issues are obviously different and different laws and agencies govern over these.
You simply enjoy twisting things to make them fit your pretty little world.