Is the question "is there a formula you can use to consistently profit at roulette?" NP complete

In response to your points 2, 3, and 4, the study of roulette is actually my area of expertise so there is little you can tell me, factually or mythically that i dont already know. It would be unfair of me to say you are wrong and not offer an arguement based on proof, but i disagree with all of what you said but cannot tell you why you are wrong. Please dont take that as an insult or me being ignorant or arrogant, i simply have a different belief to what you and the majority of the people who know the game do.

LOL!! Thats funny... Please do join in the conversation, any serious insight or thoughts you may have on the matter will be much appreciated...
Remember though, this is not a conversation about IF there is a way/formula to consistanlty profit, the QUESTION is about HOW COMPLEX that formula would have to be, and whether the wording of the question given the known facts makes the problem of Finding out that formula NP? IF THAT MAKES SENSE..?? ;P

First off, you didnt address any of the points i made in response to your previous #1 point. And that is where the answer for my original question lies so if you could do that in your next response and let me know step by step if what i have proposed as facts can be regarded as truth.

Secondly, i asked that we no longer talk about the ACTUAL MATH involved because it would then turn into an arguement about what we each both believe about maths and its application in roulette. Im sorry if this sounds insulting, but your mathematical proofs are meaningless when you know what i know.
There IS a formula which you can use to do this.
Unfortunatly i cannot divulge the proofs at this point in time because i regard this to be one of the greatest discoveries of our time, im not just gonna go round telling people a formula which i would like to eventually recieve the credit for. Even Albert Einstien said that it was an impossibility to win at roulette, based upon his own understanding of math but i assert that he was wrong. Now i in no way think i am as smart a human being as Einstien, but I KNOW WITH CERTAINTY THAT ABOUT ROULETTE, HE WAS WRONG. AND I CAN PROVE IT. Now why on earth would i give the proofs to such an ENORMOUS discovery to some random guy in an internet forum and display it for all and sundry to use it and claim as thier own... Like i said, im relatively smart and have worked for the past 4 years to get to this solution im not foolish enough to just start broadcasting my exact findings to people.
However, in order to prove it, i must let the formula be known and it must be verified. this simply cannot happen at this point because of the far reaching implications of it becoming common knowledge.
Now i know that i must obviously sound crazy, but just consider for a moment the possible cosequences of this formula becoming common knowledge:
#1 EVERYBODY WILL HAVE ACCESS TO A FORMULA WHICH WOULD GUARANTEE WINNING AT ROULETTE.
#2 BECAUSE OF THE CASINOS INABILITY TO COMBAT THE FORMULA, THEY NOW HAVE TO EITHER
#A) CHANGE THE RULES OF THE GAME
#B) STOP OFFERING ROULETTE
#C) CONCIOUSLY START CHEATING ITS CUSTOMERS
#3 WHAT HAPPENS IF #A OR #B OCCUR...???
If #B were to occur there would be, ECONOMIC LOSS STARTING WITH CASINO PROFITS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO TAX which would affect the wider community, JOB LOSSES FOR THOSE AFFECTED BY THE GAMES REMOVAL again affecting the wider community... This is just the start of the domino effect. Now imagine that on a global scale!!

DO YOU SEE WHERE IM GOING WITH THIS.....???
I have to ask myself wheter or not it is worth publishing. Now the only reason to do so is if within the formula there is other value. That is, can the formula be applied to other scenarios and be useful..

Which is where P=NP comes into play. Esentially the formula to know with certainty that it is going to make a profit would be one which GUARANTEES a positive expected value everytime and since you say that this is Mathematically Incorrect or Invalid, then it is an impossibility and cannot ever be verified.

THEREFORE DOES THE P NOW BECOME NP?
Would the formula prove that P=NP?

Secondly, i asked that we no longer talk about the ACTUAL MATH involved because it would then turn into an arguement about what we each both believe about maths and its application in roulette. Im sorry if this sounds insulting, but your mathematical proofs are meaningless when you know what i know.

Oh I buy lottery tickets, but only when the pot is huge. I know that's the stupid way to do it, but it's like a luxury vacation, I spend $10, and then we play "what would be the first thing you would do".

You shouldn't buy very many of them since 1 ticket doesn't bring any more enjoyment than 10.

because as i said, nobody believes that it is possible for such a formula to exist. Einstein himself even said it was impossible to consistantly win and that no formula or algorith could do so.
so either, nobody knows the formula or it is known by a small amount of people and not made public given the ramifications of what doing so would mean.
You said it yourself, such a formula would bankrupt casinos...

why would i need your $10,000 in a nigerian bank account.
im claiming to be able to do what the world claims is impossible. What has not been done in the whole 300 years the game has existed. your money is meaningless in comparison to the achievement. If and when i decide to publish my findings i wont have to request your money, you'll be fighting to get it into my hands!!! Ridicule me all you like. IN TIME YOU WILL SEE.

Frank Please read the following, it is an excerpt from this page:
http://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/09/09/einstein-roulette/

Dear Quote Investigator: According to a legend in the gambling world Albert Einstein once visited a Las Vegas casino and after observing the action around the roulette wheel he said:

You cannot beat a roulette table unless you steal money from it.

Any truth to this story?

Quote Investigator: QI believes this quotation can be traced back to an article and a book by a controversial reporter named Ted Thackrey, Jr. In 1968 the Toledo Blade newspaper of Ohio published a series of articles by Thackrey under the title “Secrets of a Master Gambler”. The fourth article discussed a colorful gambler named Nick the Greek who died in 1966 and whose full name was Nicholas Andrea Dandolos. A version of the saying attributed to Einstein was included [AETT]:

Indeed, Albert Einstein once made the flat statement no one could possibly win at roulette “unless he steals money from the table while the croupier isn’t looking.”

But during the little mathematician’s visit to Las Vegas the Greek stopped off briefly at a roulette table, bought a handful of chips, plunked them down on red — won — and let them ride for two more spins, on which red also appeared.

Then he cashed in, pocketed his winning and grinned at the scientist.

Secondly, i had no idea what this forum was about, i just chose the first one that came up in google.. Ooopsie.. Silly me for thinking that i would be able to have an objective discussion...

Thirdly, im new to the whole P/NP thing and actually came across it by accident whilst researching. ive only been learning about P, NP and complexity thoery for 2 days and wondered how you would classify the problem of constantly being profitabile at roulette.
my reasoning is this, if the problem is NP and you can show a way to verify the solution at the same time as working out the solution and that this solution would be universally applicable to all problems then it would show that P=NP? Right?

All i wanted was a simple answer to this question. Maybe i came to the wrong place to ask. Ridicule and scoff at me as much as you like, you are just merely showing to yourself how closed minded you are. i couldnt give a bent banana what you think. I KNOW WHAT I KNOW!! :p

i actually am..