FOUND SOUL
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:13 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Is it not odd how Found Soul and the news media hardly cover the fact that of those that was killed three was knife to death?


"Clap, clap" you've read some of it, not all as if you had, you would have read that I have more than once mentioned the three first killed, 2 room mates and one that he dragged in. You would have read, that I said, he invited two of his old "friends" from school to stay that weekend with him as well, obvious plan to make that 5, you would have read that I said that he had also planned to kill his Mother-in-law and brother and you would have read that I said, he "tried" to decapitate the flat mates that he knifed to death as in his manifesto, to roll their heads down the road, but he failed to be able to do that.

How odd that you haven't read all the posts here, at least mine, given you decided to add me into the media circle. I suggest you read before you make a false accusation and join in properly instead of simply making a crappy post that means nothing, I'll ad.....please. Because I'm nice. Most of the time.

I'm more interested in the mind of Elliot than spending my valuable time answering this nonsense Bill.

FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:16 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Beside the little fact that he did half of his killings with a knife
3 verses 7 as he shot himself, does not add up to 50% and you forget the injured 12 or 13 on top of that, via a gun. Or running them down, did you know that he did that?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:18 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Apparently he used that knife well, as it takes some time to kill three people with one, reportedly stabbing each one many times. In close, lots of physical work required, had to do it right to keep from waking the other victims


A knife is more of a up close and personal means of killing then a gun and I would assume that he wish to off those three guys in that manner.


That is what they always say on the cop shows, but we dont usually see a lot of knife work, and he was cut off from the collective so I would have expected a cold standoffish killing spree, like the guy who walked into the batman movie and started spraying bullets around, hitting people he did not know. So ya this is strange.

But the skill of what he did, the guts it took to do it, knowing that if he messed up and woke the others that they would come and get him...impressive. Like his 140 pages. He was clearly pretty damn sure that he would do the job right.

Gotta think this was a message.." you all would not even give me the time of day, you thought I was dumb, you thought I was afraid (HI DAVID!)
but you were wrong".
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:28 am
@hawkeye10,
It is possible as Firefly thinks, that he drugged them, they were his flat mates, two of them. He spent ages in his room to devise this plan and how would he have gotten the third in, from the street so easily ? The first two would have to have been dead right? He mentioned he intended to bring them in off the street as well and what about his two mates he intended to also be there at that time? 5 altogether, I don't think he just simply walked up behind one and slashed his throat and then did the other, and then did his carving up do you?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:33 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Peter Rodger told a friend the other day that his son had been an enigma to the family — distant, remote, unknowable. “He’s such a good liar that I didn’t even know he knew how to lie

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/02/us/elliot-rodger-killings-in-california-followed-years-of-withdrawal.html

Ya right, you are dad for 22 years and never once catch your kid lying. You were not trying. You moved your kid from school to school like the Vatican moving a child molesting priest from parish to parish, and like the Vatican you never dealt with the problem.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:39 am
@firefly,
DAVID wrote:
Elliot Rodger never got rejected by any girl.
In his lengthy manifesto, tho he complains about rejection
very redundantly, he offers not even ONE instance
of any girl having declined his invitation to go out.
He never offered an invitation.
That was his downfall; he was disabled by fear.
firefly wrote:
I think you have a much more accurate idea of what Elliot Rodger
was like than Hawkeye does, particularly the fear that gripped him,
and probably prevented him from taking the initiative in any social
encounter, including with other males.
It did; someone explained sexual reproduction to him. He understood that,
but he gives no indication that anyone told him that boys
have the responsibility to initiate social contact with girls.
I suspect that he WAS told of it, but that his fear shut it out
of his consciousness. His fear was not his friend.


firefly wrote:
Do you remember his terror at his graduation, I think it was in 6th grade,
because he'd have to announce his name from the stage after receiving his diploma?
Yes; his name and his high school,
but thay made him do it. I 've heard that in survays, people have
ranked public speaking worse than death, in terms of intensity of fear.
I remember back to my age 13: I had too much fear of PRIVATE speaking,
in terms of chickening out many times qua asking out my First Love. Public speaking was OK.
I lived in a state of terror of embarrassment of her rejecting a social invitation from me.
After I was 14, I saw her wearing a birthday corsage, in school indicative of her 14th birthday.
I broke the ice by wishing her a Happy Birthday. Social conversation ensued,
to which I appended my invitation for a Saturday night date and I got rejected.
That was the happiest moment in my life, before or since; ineffable thrill
in that I had finally defeated my social cowardice. I did not expect that JOY.
A few weeks later, I asked her again. It was much less stressful to approach her
the 2nd time. I got rejected again. I was thrilled again, but not as much as before.
A few months later, I asked her again. It was much easier to approach her.
I was rejected again. I felt very good about asking her again,
but not as thrilling as the first 2 times. These were the effects
of approach-avoidance reactions. As I read Elliot's manifesto,
I remembered those experiences. I wondered if Elliot wud have hated me
for having succeeded in making social contact with her, whereas he was mute.
In contrast to Elliot, I NEVER had even the slightest ill will
toward her concerning her rejection of my invitation.
It was obvious that she was well within her rights.




firefly wrote:
He wasn't just shy. His social anxiety was massive, and quite debilitating.
Yes, indeed. It was very sad.
From his manifesto, he seemed to be in relatively good mental health
in his earlier years, and really freaking out in terms of psychosis
toward the end, progressively worse.


firefly wrote:
But, while other males sometimes did take the initiative with him,
the females likely didn't because, as you point out, "the extant social paradigm requires the boy to take the initiative". However, if he was unable to do that, or simply couldn't recognize that was the social paradigm, he would simply transfer the "duty" onto the female in order to satisfy his sense of entitlement. The whole idea of showing interest in another person, or trying to engage them, was beyond him. Not only did he never ask a girl out, his manifesto contains no reports of any efforts, at all, to just have a conversation with a girl.
Well, to be fair, his efforts to establish social contact
and to give the town the opportunity to redeem itself, consisted
of exhibiting himself as a pedestrian, marching thru its streets,
thereby affording its ladies the opportunity to run out and intercept him.
Based on my experience as of c.5O years ago:
this can actually HAPPEN, if u have the presence of mind
to be leading a sufficiently cute dog (preferably a puppy); chick magnets.




firefly wrote:
He really thought that, if he just stood on campus, next to his BMW,
wearing his $300 sunglasses, those status symbols really would act like
an actual magnet to attract beautiful girls, who would suddenly rush
to his side, and immediately announce, "I want to be your girlfriend."
He engaged in a lot of magical thinking like that, and it seemed part
and parcel of his generally autistic thinking.
Well, actually, that HAS WORKED (un-expectedly)
but when it has, it was more than obvious that the young lady
is of a mercenary mind and intentions; not personal.



Quote:
autistic thinking-- preoccupation with inner thoughts, daydreams,
fantasies, private logic; egocentric, subjective thinking lacking objectivity
and connection with external reality
Thank u for that information. I did not know that.





David
0 Replies
 
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:47 am
@hawkeye10,
I ticked that but hold on a minute.

He could be in denial this is a shock to his family. Yes he did move him from school to school, home to home, some due to his work but also because Elliot cried so much that he didn't want to go back and they found him another school, be fair.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:54 am
@hawkeye10,
Hawkeye wrote:
Gotta think this was a message.." you all would not even give me the time of day,
you thought I was dumb, you thought I was afraid (HI DAVID!)
but you were wrong".
Will u explain what that meant, Hawkeye ?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 03:06 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Hawkeye wrote:
Gotta think this was a message.." you all would not even give me the time of day,
you thought I was dumb, you thought I was afraid (HI DAVID!)
but you were wrong".
Will u explain what that meant, Hawkeye ?

you think he was paralyzed by extreme fear, and likely others did too, but his acts on this day are of a fearless person.
FOUND SOUL
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 03:29 am
@hawkeye10,
No a mad man. In the end he was still in fear but, he saw so many answers given to him edging him from the Forums, telling him he was a loser, a virgin, just like his Step Mother did, his anger of this enraged him to the extent he didn't care anymore, he already was suicidal a year before and asked for help you commented on that... He was ready to act on "evil"... That's not fearless he thought he was God because in the end no matter what he tried, winning the lottery, no way could he not, he put it out into the Universe, it was going to happen, twice, so he lost twice and at that point he lost the fight, there was NO MORE HOPE and that is what he banked on HOPE.

He gave up. That's not a fearful or a fearless person, once your brain switches to I don't care mode, once it switches to if I can't have fame in the real world, I will have it in the dead world, I will be dead, but I will have it.. Like everything he tried, Mother bought him everything, I will have it... So was his ending, I will have it and in a way he does. In a way he doesn't.
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 03:49 am
@FOUND SOUL,
FOUND SOUL wrote:

I ticked that but hold on a minute.

He could be in denial this is a shock to his family. Yes he did move him from school to school, home to home, some due to his work but also because Elliot cried so much that he didn't want to go back and they found him another school, be fair.


I want to believe that the parents did their best even though they completely failed, but they they say stuff " I did not even know he could lie" .

I'll tell you where I am at right now, I want to know more about all the docs this guy had been too. I saw a report claiming that he has been seeing docs since age 8. WTF! I am getting a very bad feeling about these parents. I think we are going to find out that after months of years of visits one or more doctors recommended putting this kid in the hospital, and then the parents would cart him off to another doctor. That they did not know how bad off he was because they did not want to know, the professed ignorance level of the parents is too great to be believed.

Quote:
" Rugg described Rodger as a recluse who stayed in his room mostly and would have angry phone conversations with his father.

http://laist.com/2014/05/30/man_named_in_elliot_rodger_manifest.php

So he is basically non commutative with the world at this point but with pops everything is different. Important clue I am sure, but I dont know what it means yet.

nononono
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 03:55 am
Did you know that 85% of all feminists are born with a mustache?

It's a scientific fact. I can prove it on a chart.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 04:19 am
@hawkeye10,
I get what you are feeling thinking, I tend to think the same, I see "Denial" that was their son, no way, we sent him to this, that and the other.....

I will say this. The Step-Mother was it "tough love?" She embarrassed him so much that he never invited people to "their home" when his Mother's home was small, cheap, he had the big house, but he kept telling people about his Father's house but didn't feel comfortable taking them there, because she had already embarrassed him before.... Sure he was about power, but his Father he claims never, ever, ever, stood up for him, took her side. Power?

Wait. The Mother did that ,at 7 due to Divorce wanting more money from the Divorce remember? The Father never heard he had an illness before then.. So again she saw it, I don't think it was a ploy for money but reality, she is the only one that did everything she could to make him feel "special".. His Father saw nothing treaded him as a normal "boy" fly kites, etc which he loved and admired his Father. His Father I believe was in denial.

So why did he have angry conversations? Because his Father saw him as normal.. Believed that his ex stated what she did for money eventually maybe, believed her and paid for help.. But, he was never there for him once he got where he wanted to go, career wise? That is what I think.

She handled it all on her own.

Step Mother was quite evil in reality, telling him that her own son, would get laid before his age? And was going to be someone?

What woman states that to any child/ young adult.

If you want to blame someone. Father wasn't there enough, he ended up with someone who saw him as different and crucified him.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 07:56 am
@hawkeye10,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Hawkeye wrote:
Gotta think this was a message.." you all would not even give me the time of day,
you thought I was dumb, you thought I was afraid (HI DAVID!)
but you were wrong".
Will u explain what that meant, Hawkeye ?
hawkeye10 wrote:
you think he was paralyzed by extreme fear,
and likely others did too, but his acts on this day are of a fearless person.
No. His manifesto explicitly shows that he was very afraid
of defensively armed people, specifically the Police.

In regard to un-armed folks, he was fearless in that his Retributive campaign
was conceived, from its start, as being suicidal; ergo, he had nothing to lose.
He refused to live in the world, as he perceived it to be; it was intolerable to him.
In his very sad delusions, he was being continually insulted and the poignant victim
of social discrimination; de facto ostracism. I wonder whether medication wud have
served to disabuse him.

I discern that u meant to tell me something, calling out to me by name
as set forth hereinbefore, but I have failed to detect its meaning.

Perhaps u will elucidate.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 08:19 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
So he is basically non commutative with the world
at this point but with pops everything is different.
Important clue I am sure, but I dont know what it means yet.
I don t either; u wanted him to commute ???

(He had a functional BMW.)
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 01:05 pm

As I was reading Elliot's manifesto, I was living a dichotomy
of closely relating to some of what he was describing
(e.g., delaying fear of asking out my First Love) and
my finding alien his love of childhood and his craving,
Peter Pan-like, to remain a child. In his mind, he was a child.
In contrast, in the early years of my life, I never considered myself
to be a child. In the back of my mind, I silently deemed myself
to be an adult. I resented any implications to the contrary.
He showed dis-inclination to reach adulthood.
I remembered being eager to reach age 18.


Additionally, I had a lot of trouble understanding the reason
(which he never gave) of his failure to simply BUY the sexual
services that he so obsessively craved, the same as he buys a shoeshine.
( Admittedly, he also said that he craved love; I doubt that u can buy that.)

His manifesto leaves us to infer that he never spent a minute in a bordello.


In contemplation of that oddity,
I suspect that his fear even disabled him from THAT.

MY first time (when I first took the initiative, as distinct from being the target)
was with a nice-looking, cute lady of the evening, named Lisa. She looked about 2O,
give or take. She did not charge much and she was well worth it. I was 11.
I did not have much confidence in myself, but I knew my cash was as good as anyone 's.

Another difference between Elliot's experience and my own,
was that he said several times that his sexual cravings began
when he hit puberty at 13 or 14; (he inconsistently mentions both ages).
I remember my 3rd Birthday Party and continuously since, but I don t
remember any time in my life that I did not have erotic feelings.





David


hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 01:21 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Additionally, I had a lot of trouble understanding the reason
(which he never gave) of his failure to simply BUY the sexual
services that he so obsessively craved, the same as he buys a shoeshine.
( Admittedly, he also said that he craved love; I doubt that u can buy that.)

His manifesto leaves us to infer that he never spent a minute in a bordello


for the same reason that he was never going to deliver pizzas for Dominos...that is what lessor men than him do. According to him he was stud material, women simply did not understand.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 01:54 pm
@firefly,
Arguing that people should not be bound by gender roles is not not quite the same as declaring that gender roles are destructive to everyone.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 01:58 pm
@hawkeye10,
DAVID wrote:
Additionally, I had a lot of trouble understanding the reason
(which he never gave) of his failure to simply BUY the sexual
services that he so obsessively craved, the same as he buys a shoeshine.
( Admittedly, he also said that he craved love; I doubt that u can buy that.)

His manifesto leaves us to infer that he never spent a minute in a bordello

hawkeye10 wrote:
for the same reason that he was never going to deliver pizzas for Dominos...
that is what lessor men than him do.
Much greater men than Elliot have enjoyed the pleasures of bordellos.
That 's no secret.




hawkeye10 wrote:
According to him he was stud material,
women simply did not understand.
I was surprized at how much he resembled me,
at that age. He described himself as being beautiful
(several times), but the writing does not support
the notion that he was a stud. As a virgin,
he was not in much of a position to know that.

I wonder Y his dad did not get Elliot to a bordello
when he was crying in despair n fully freaking out !???

Is that neglect ?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Jun, 2014 02:09 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Just read that the guns were legally registered, so..
I now think, given the reporting going on by the concerned family, that the police messed up.


How about the knife that he used to kill half the people he did kill?

A lot of interest in his guns yet it was not his only killing tool.
He rammed 2 bicyclists on the road with his BMW.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Elliot Rodger
  3. » Page 37
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 02:39:30