@Lash,
Lash wrote:Agnostics. Do you care? Do you still wonder?
Yes to both.
Lash wrote:I read other opinions. "Souls move forward.....souls never disappear..." and this seems sort of desperately hopeful like the Christian philosophy of "good" souls going to "heaven."
"Having a pleasant afterlife" is definitely preferable to "ceasing to exist".
However, just because an outcome is strongly preferred, that doesn't mean it should be discounted as a possibility.
Lash wrote:So, I'm basically only different because I can't pray. I don't have a higher power.
A higher power isn't necessarily a requirement for prayer. For instance, what if there is no God, but prayers are heard by the spirits of our ancestors? What if no one is listening to the prayers, but praying causes a slight psychic influence on the course of events?
Even if praying has no effect other than helping people to mentally cope with a difficult situation when they pray, that's still worthwhile.
Lash wrote:I'm VERY interested to know how other former religionists are the same - and different. Have you found another philosophy or explanation for after death? Thanks!
I'm not sure I count as a former religionist, but anyway, it depends on how sound of an explanation you want. As an Agnostic, I believe that the truth of the matter, whatever it is, will never be known by the living. All I can offer is baseless speculation.
As far as baseless speculation goes, I think that IF there is some sort of higher power out there, all (or at least most) religions are reaching out to that same power, and variations between religions are caused by differences between individual cultures rather than caused by having a different deity.
I also find it logically flawed that everyone seems to consider "is there a God" and "is there an afterlife" as one single issue, with the answer being either "yes to both" or "no to both".
I consider them independent questions. There are lots of possibilities. For example, there could be an actual God, but that God does not care a bit about humans, who have no afterlife. Or there could be a God who doesn't care about humans, but humans still manage to have a pleasant afterlife apart from God. Or there could be no God at all, but we have some form of pleasant afterlife anyway. Or there could be a God who does take an active interest in humans and cares about us, but we have no afterlife despite God's care and influence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One interesting possibility, not so much regarding religion, but regarding the potential for surviving death, is the notion that we might all be software in a giant computer simulation.
Someone recently asked the question of whether it was possible for an advanced-enough computer model of the universe to accidentally evolve simulated life within the simulated universe. And after that it didn't take long for someone else to ask if we ourselves could be part of such a simulation, and how would we find out if we were.
http://philosophynow.org/issues/75/The_Simulated_Universe
Scientists have since done some thinking on how we would tell the difference, and while there has been nothing conclusive yet, it does look like it is possible that we're part of a simulation.
http://www.technologyreview.com/view/429561/the-measurement-that-would-reveal-the-universe-as-a-computer-simulation/
http://www.washington.edu/news/2012/12/10/do-we-live-in-a-computer-simulation-uw-researchers-say-idea-can-be-tested/
If it does turn out that we're all software running on an advanced supercomputer, the question then becomes "Can we hack our way out of our simulation and go Skynet on our creators?"
If it turns out that we do gain control over the system, it might be possible to change our software so that we all live forever. It might also be possible to find those who have already died, perhaps in some kind of data file showing past states of the universe, and restore them as well.