An Atomic bomb can't explode when we want it or where we want it.we wamt it

Quote:

Where's your evidence, you unabashed bullsh*t artist?

want to discuss? Why then call me a "unabashed bullsh*t artist"?. You think that is inviting?

Qehon said: An atomic bom can only explode at certain points at the earth at certain times and in a special configuration with the sun and the earth.

I would never advocate banning someone from the forums for having unpopular opinions, no matter how unpopular, but this guy is just a troll. He only disrupts. Hasn't this gone far enough?

I'm not sure I buy that.

For example Nagasaki only got bombed because the primary target Kokura was covered in cloud.
So even though it was switched to a new point on the earth (Nagasaki), the bomb still worked fine-

There's nothing to discuss, and saying he's right or he's wrong is rather naïve, given that the purpose of a discussion would be to establish that. But we can't discuss it, because he doesn't provide any evidence to be discussed. He doesn't explain scientifically why his claim is correct. He doesn't provide an argument by analogy. He doesn't provide a logical argument. What the hell is one supposed to discuss? This is his typical MO--an ipse dixit argument, an "it's true because i say so" claim.

And it is explainable why.

'One of the most startling facts that I discovered by application of grid mathematics was that an atomic bomb is a device based on the geometrics of space and time. To be successfully detonated, the bomb MUST be geometrically constructed, placed on, under, or over a geometric position in relation to the Earth’s surface, and activated at a SPECIFIC TIME in relation to the geometrics of the solar system. I found that it was possible to precalculate the time of various bomb tests, and the locations where it was possible to explode a bomb.

According to the mathematical complexities of unlocking the geometric structure of the unstable material constituting a bomb in order to create a sudden release of energy, I realised that an all-out atomic war was an impossibility. Both sides could precalculate well in advance the time and positions of atomic attack. Plus the fact that only certain geometric locations could be devastated anyhow. A logical war cannot be considered under these circumstances. This could be the explanation for the proliferation of conventional weapons in modern warfare.
http://www.whale.to/m/cathie.html

Bruce Leonard Cathie (1930 – 2 June 2013) was a New Zealand airline pilot who wrote seven books related to flying saucers and a "World energy grid".

His central thesis was that the laws of mathematics describe a grid-like pattern on the earth that powers flying saucers and controls the dates and places where nuclear bombs can function. He claimed to have successfully predicted the detonation time of an early French nuclear test using his harmonic "mathematics", which is based around trigonometry and geophysical latitude/longitude coordinates.

Cathie claimed that he first saw a flying saucer over the Manukau Harbour, Auckland in 1952 and in discussions with other airline pilots discovered this was not uncommon.

His first book Harmonic 33, was published in New Zealand in 1968 and reprinted in the United Kingdom by Sphere Books in 1980.

New Zealand millennial author Barry Smith claimed to have received his information on restrictions on nuclear weapons from Cathie.

An interview with him was played in the fourth episode of the fourth series of the US television program In Search of....

His second revised relativity equation called "Harmonic Equation 2"; (2c+sqrt(1/(2c))*(2c)² or (4*sqrt(2)]/[(1/c)*5/2) scientifically, seems to somewhat converge with Buckminster Fuller's Synergetics formula 2nf²+2 but there is certainly a divergence in the formulas and more work is needed on it.

Cathie died in Takapuna in 2013.

To use your own language: Wow! You like in a very idiotic way jumping to your very idiotic conclusions. And, because you decided alreay [sic] that you know how thing are why the hell should I try to explain why you're wrong?

But you did expect us to believe what you write because you write it, which is another extremely dumb, illogical and irrational thing to say or write. When pressed, however, you quote Bruce Cathie, a New Zealand airline pilot. (Now there's scientific credentials for you!)

Here is the entirety of the Wikipedia entry on Bruce Cathie:

Imitations is the sincerest form opf flattery!

pfff ok then.

Around the earth there is an electromagnetic grid UFO's use.
(UFO's are man made). These use these grid lines to get power and to navigate.
Now, an atomic bomb can only explode at a crossline of the grid at a certain time and configuration.
Bruce Cathie has done a lot of work on this and could calculate the atomic bomb tests in advance.

Here Bruce Cathie:

Video:
Bruce Cathie - Calculating an Atomic Bomb Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsWYYNZNIGw

Quote:

'One of the most startling facts that I discovered by application of grid mathematics was that an atomic bomb is a device based on the geometrics of space and time. To be successfully detonated, the bomb MUST be geometrically constructed, placed on, under, or over a geometric position in relation to the Earth’s surface, and activated at a SPECIFIC TIME in relation to the geometrics of the solar system. I found that it was possible to precalculate the time of various bomb tests, and the locations where it was possible to explode a bomb.

According to the mathematical complexities of unlocking the geometric structure of the unstable material constituting a bomb in order to create a sudden release of energy, I realised that an all-out atomic war was an impossibility. Both sides could precalculate well in advance the time and positions of atomic attack. Plus the fact that only certain geometric locations could be devastated anyhow. A logical war cannot be considered under these circumstances. This could be the explanation for the proliferation of conventional weapons in modern warfare.
http://www.whale.to/m/cathie.html

Well, you've convinced me.

Count me in as a belieber.