Quote:The thesis of religion is that god created everything. Does cloning threaten that thesis?
It depends whether you mean religion as in spirituality, or the institutions of religion, e.g. the anglican church...
1.spirituality:
I'd say not really. As a matter of word sophistry one can argue that if god created everything, then cloning and giving birth fall in the same category, re-arranging pre-created items(existing cells) to form new objects(humans). God will also know of a way to inject the soul into the newly 'created' human (through the mustache dip, the hyper-dimensional soulsender, or test-tube flashcard or whatever)The gnostic argument can be all encompassing assuming you accept the premise "god created everything".
2.Religion business units:
Wether or not cloning threatens the institutions of (western) religion is a matter of how literal they are.
For some institutions(of religion), this will undoubtedly be blasphemy, and they'd do their best to prevent it from happening, to save consistency for their literal interpretations. Unfortunately (for them), this will not be a tenable position in the long-term, since as was said, it is a matter of time before this will be routine.
For some institutions(of religion), this will mark a point where they can participate in the moral/ethical perils involved, assuming they can participate as opposed to dictate.
It is clear though, that direction on ethical issues of cloning(or others) will not come from the scientific world, since they're in a "proof-of-concept" frenzy that precludes them from it (as it did with the A-bomb). So in a roundabout way, cloning may actually serve as validator of some of these institutions...