Kolyo wrote: "You have all the self-awareness of a cat, with none of the cuteness."
That's a silly and illogical remark. Nothing in this thread has any bearing on my SELF-awareness. You sound like a defective and as-if insecure pseudo-sentient, foolishly abusing language in an attempt to taunt a sentient being with criticism which has previously (and accurately) been leveled against you (or against another of your silly pseudo-personalities).
I think it's quite revealing that none of the participants in this thread was able to offer a simple refutation of my original answer, based on first principles, without technical jargon and in language that anyone can understand.
Here's the refutation:
The total number of possible results, minus the number of results that fail to satisfy the requirements, gives the number of results that satisfy the requirements; and the number of results satisfying the requirements, divided by the total number of possible results, gives the percentage of possible results which satisfy the requirements.
(A) Total number of possible results = 1000 x 999 x 998 x 997 x 996 x 995 x 994 x 993 x 992 x 991
(B) Number of results that fail to satisfy the requirements = 900 x 899 x 898 x 897 x 896 x 895 x 894 x 893 x 892 x 891
[(A) - (B)] / (A) = 0.3469 = 34.69% (rounded to the nearest hundredth of a percentage point)