Can one proof that god DOESN'T exist?

Or the sound of one hand clapping.

a pragmatic koan, the sound of one axe chopping.

One blade scissor (?)

getting tangential here but does god have a brain?

A brain is god for you?

yeah pretty much

Then your god has a brain.

Why not ask, is the pope catholic?

Humans in different regions find numbers probably independently, while they find god (independently).
And Scientists find America's oldest image of a deity.

god
Zat vas very interesting, Satt. :wink:

It means "satisfied" in German.

but is it really Sattisfactory?
[or I should say Zattisfactory]
Hmm, a "zatt is" factory would be a place where they make little argument dolls for the "Argument Clinic".
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6342&start=110

and jl, and C.I.;
while I relish your offers of "president" and "king", I think I would prefer to remain the "court jester"!!

BGW, If you wish to become the court jester, your avatar must/should reflect such. LOL c.i.

To prove a God is existent is just as unnecessary as to prove a God does not exist. As Kierkegaard thought, God was not a stuff for reasoning in composure. God is a matter of faith.

Good point. And furthermore anyone setting out to prove such a negative, should have boundless, mental energy, and a LOT of time on their hands.
...And as far as the positive position goes; As completly as I believe in the affirmative, I would never try to prove it. All you can get from me is an example of my reason for believing. And that's only upon request.

Plainly stated, when one trusts in something, one already trusts its existence.
When someone claims that a mathematical object (e.g., a line) exists, the person believes the consistency of a mathematical system (without proof of the latter).
You are taught about mathematics and a proof of a theorem in schools, but never shown the proof of the math system as a whole. You probably trust math without a proof. And it is a theorem in logic that you cannot prove the consistency of math containing arithmetic with the first order predicate logic.

Oh ye of "too much" faith !

This just in; courtesy of the .......Bee........;

Evidence # 00065833497
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7073

So there we have it;

"The C. elegans are primitive organisms that share many biological characteristics of humans."
They "have two sexes: males and hermaphrodites, which are females that produce sperm. A hermaphrodite worm can self-fertilize for the first 300 or so eggs but later usually prefers to accept sperm from males to produce a larger number of offspring."
Obviously "sex" began with the hermaphrodite female, with the male turning up as a later mutation, which seems to have added a bit of "umpf"!

Guess its time to go back and edit all those bibles;

The story of "Eve and Adam"

The proof . . .
After death God will prove he exists, or reaffirm that he doesn't, all we have to do is wait and see.