Tarantulas wrote:Unconsciously, you have answered your own question - your post contains the word "lead" and "leader." You do recognize George Bush as a leader, because that's what he does best. He may not be a stellar orator, but he's a decisive leader, and that's exactly what this country needs. Many of us believe he's taking this country in the right direction.
Uh, consciously, I made it fairly clear that I do not believe GW is qualified to lead anything, with the possible exception of an Easter egg hunt. Decisive leadership is only good when the decisions are correct - Saddam Hussein was a decisive leader, no? (Please, don't run too far with that - I am not saying that GW is the same as Saddam Hussein.)
And, in my opinion, his inability to communicate well is a direct reflection of his lack of intelligence. I'm not going to change your opinion of him - you're not going to change mine. We'll all have our chance to be heard in November.