@neologist,
I was wondering also about the discussion thread on whether Lord Jesus actually existed. I'm not a bible literalist, just a bible moralist, because you have to decide what is literal and what is not literal. -------------------------------------------------------Like all ancient myths and legends from all cultures of the world, mythical connotations are often applied to characters who actually existed or partially existed in a metaphoric way. Like the genesis, all cultures have or had their own interpretations whether in a lliteral or metaphoric way. -------------------------------------------------------- I think the Jews' idea of the genesis is literal and metaphoric, where Adam and Eve are the first parents of the Jewish people as far back as they can actually remember. May be the geneology goes back furtherer than Adam and Eve, but they are the only parents they can recall going back so far in time, who knows? --------------------------------------------------------- What I am trying to get at is that I think many mythical connotations have been applied to Lord Jesus and I agree that some of them are pretty far out. But I don't think any human being can fabricate such a character as Lord Jesus. They can probably add stuff, but not fabricate the very essence of his being. It would take a most intelligent person to fabricate the morals and insights of Lord Jesus I personally think. --------------------------------------------------------- But as a Christian I know who my allegiance belongs to whether so-called realists think I'm in LaLa land or not. I mean, could they do better at prioritiizing human morality? I would think not. I mean we all need a guide that reminds us of how it is to be human, what is insane, what is normal and all those sorts of things. But as I always say"whatever your preference of psychology is, if it keeps you well and thriving, it must be good" But if it doesn't keep you well and thriving, try Christianity.