@hawkeye10,
Sounds like that school district may be run by a bunch of old farts, which is why they're retiring or not running again.
Quote:Dryden was disciplined for warning his students they had the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate themselves before answering an in-class survey..
No that wasn't exactly why he was reprimanded, and you know that--he did more than that. He told the students he wouldn't answer the questions honestly, and he wouldn't give answers that "could get you in trouble". So he was promoting dishonesty, he was sabotaging the testing program, he was casting aspersions on the motives of those doing the testing, and he was falsely implying the student's could "incriminate" themselves by their answers, which was untrue.
If you had something, like a meal special, that you were trying out at your restaurant, and one that you had worked on for a long time and were quite proud of, and one of the patrons asked one of your waiters if it was safe to eat, because he was concerned about the mushrooms in it, and the waiter answered, "Well, I wouldn't eat that stuff" and, "It's safer not to eat anything in here that could possibly make you ill," how would you deal with that employee? He'd implied you might be serving bad food, and he'd undermined consumer confidence in your eating establishment, and he wasn't showing much respect for you. Don't tell me you wouldn't fire the guy, Hawkeye. You wouldn't admire him for telling the patron he wouldn't eat your food, or that the patron should be careful about trying your new special because it could possibly make him ill . In effect, that's the same sort of thing the teacher did with his students regarding the testing. And you know you'd fire someone like that--you've fired people for a lot less, as you told us in another thread. So, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, are defending this teacher.