31
   

Guns And The Laws That Govern Them

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 11:48 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:
David likes a hot warm gun in his hand,
Yes. U have a point there.
I love gunnery practice.


RexRed wrote:
it takes his shallow mind off his tiny penis
I don 't have that problem; is that your new obsession ?
I don 't mind. I have no ego identification with that.
Its worse with my facial appearance; I never liked that. U have a much better face.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 11:53 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

RexRed wrote:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWTiR7ak7K7A_N0ZL0FrjMq3bmWSCdHyiapV6bi7PZxQfiL1Fa08NlDKZb
I 'm back.
The children whose death shud be stopped
shud be well armed in their own defense,
at the earliest feasible age, as I armed myself at age 8.
Thay shud be trained in school in effective, efficient defensive gunnery
and in safe gun handling practices and repeatedly drilled over and over.
David


Are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all of our 8 year olders were given guns to carry???

C'mon, David. You actually make some decent points for your side of this issue at times...but this is so far over the top, I am astonished you ever posted it.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 01:13 pm
Quote:
OmSigDavid said: @RF- The authoritarians wud like u to believe
that there were no murders nor other violent felonies before
guns were invented. Maybe Julius Caesar was never assassinated ??

Ha ha yes; even if guns were banned, people would simply switch to using clubs, swords and knives to kill each other..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Cesar-sa_mort2_zps4aa2fff0.jpg~original
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 01:20 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Great then you don't mind trading in your guns for knives instead if they are the same thing...

If you answer no then you know your argument is disingenuous and you also have no values to post something you know is false...
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 01:52 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
OmSigDavid said: @RF- The authoritarians wud like u to believe
that there were no murders nor other violent felonies before
guns were invented. Maybe Julius Caesar was never assassinated ??
Romeo Fabulini wrote:
Ha ha yes; even if guns were banned,
people would simply switch to using clubs, swords and knives to kill each other..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Cesar-sa_mort2_zps4aa2fff0.jpg~original
Some historians have speculated Julius Caesar knew
that Brutus was his illegitimate son and loved him dearly.

If guns were banned, then people wud do what thay did
when alcohol and marijuana were banned.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 02:11 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:
Great then you don't mind trading in your guns for knives instead
if they are the same thing...
No; guns are good for everyone who uses them,
whereas knives are more labor-intensive and
require speed and more co-ordination. Knives wud not serve
the very young, the elderly or the infirm to save their lives
as well as guns do. In 2005, I had intestinal surgery,
with a resultant infection. I was so badly enfeebled
that I cud not walk for a while. If I had only a knife
to defend myself when I left the hospital: forget it. A butterfly cud have taken me.





RexRed wrote:
If you answer no then you know your argument is disingenuous
and you also have no values to post something you know is false...
Tell us AGAIN about how u spent 48 minutes
watching my 2 minute and 16 second video.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:08 pm
@Frank Apisa,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

RexRed wrote:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWTiR7ak7K7A_N0ZL0FrjMq3bmWSCdHyiapV6bi7PZxQfiL1Fa08NlDKZb
I 'm back.
The children whose death shud be stopped
shud be well armed in their own defense,
at the earliest feasible age, as I armed myself at age 8.
Thay shud be trained in school in effective, efficient defensive gunnery
and in safe gun handling practices and repeatedly drilled over and over.
David
Frank Apisa wrote:
Are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...
and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year olders were given guns to carry???
That is what the education and training are for.
Do u believe in automobile driver 's ed.? U bet your life.




Frank Apisa wrote:
C'mon, David. You actually make some decent points for your side of this issue at times...
but this is so far over the top, I am astonished you ever posted it.
I believe in EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
In 1956 the USSC declared in Browder v. Gayle that government
discrimination regarding a few moments of seating on a public bus
was an intolerable violation of a citizen's (Rosa Parks's)
Constitutional Right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
An ordinary citizen, not just an elevated elite; this addresses
what I call the Saints and Angels interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, to wit:
THE 2nd AMENDMENT WAS NOT ENACTED ONLY TO PROTECT
THE SAINTS and ANGELS OF AMERICA: EVERYONE HAS AN EQUAL RIGHT, EQUAL RIGHT,
EQUAL RIGHT TO DEFEND HIS OR HER LIFE
from predatory violence.
When 7 year old Noah Yates was being dragged to his death in Andrea 's bathtub,
I wish he 'd been lucky enuf to snatch up a gun from somewhere. He NEEDED it.

Wud u have told him NO!, Frank? "C'mon, Noah get to the tub; u dont need guns; TOO YOUNG!"??
U 'd have told him to keep his hands OFF of any guns and let her drag him
to the bathtub. He did. The supporters of gun control got their wish:
the victims were un-armed. The predator survived intact. Congratulations!





David
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:15 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

RexRed wrote:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWTiR7ak7K7A_N0ZL0FrjMq3bmWSCdHyiapV6bi7PZxQfiL1Fa08NlDKZb
I 'm back.
The children whose death shud be stopped
shud be well armed in their own defense,
at the earliest feasible age, as I armed myself at age 8.
Thay shud be trained in school in effective, efficient defensive gunnery
and in safe gun handling practices and repeatedly drilled over and over.
David
Frank Apisa wrote:
Are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...
and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year olders were given guns to carry???
That is what the education and training are for.
Do u believe in automobile driver 's ed.? U bet your life.


So tell me, David, are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry?


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
C'mon, David. You actually make some decent points for your side of this issue at times...
but this is so far over the top, I am astonished you ever posted it.
I believe in EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
In 1956 the USSC declared in Browder v. Gayle that government
discrimination regarding a few moments of seating on a public bus
was an intolerable violation of a citizen's (Rosa Parks's)
Constitutional Right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
An ordinary citizen, not just an elevated elite; this addresses
what I call the Saints and Angels interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, to wit:
THE 2nd AMENDMENT WAS NOT ENACTED ONLY TO PROTECT
THE SAINTS and ANGELS OF AMERICA: EVERYONE HAS AN EQUAL RIGHT, EQUAL RIGHT,
EQUAL RIGHT TO DEFEND HIS OR HER LIFE
from predatory violence.
When 7 year old Noah Yates was being dragged to his death in Andrea 's bathtub,
I wish he 'd been lucky enuf to snatch up a gun from somewhere. He NEEDED it.

Wud u have told him NO!, Frank? "C'mon, Noah get to the tub; u dont need guns; TOO YOUNG!"??
U 'd have told him to keep his hands OFF of any guns and let her drag him
to the bathtub. He did. The supporters of gun control got their wish:
the victims were un-armed. The predator survived intact. Congratulations!
David


Ummm...perhaps you did not fully understand the question, David.

Allow me to re-word it:

Are you actually serious in trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry???

OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:33 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

RexRed wrote:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWTiR7ak7K7A_N0ZL0FrjMq3bmWSCdHyiapV6bi7PZxQfiL1Fa08NlDKZb
I 'm back.
The children whose death shud be stopped
shud be well armed in their own defense,
at the earliest feasible age, as I armed myself at age 8.
Thay shud be trained in school in effective, efficient defensive gunnery
and in safe gun handling practices and repeatedly drilled over and over.
David
Frank Apisa wrote:
Are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...
and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year olders were given guns to carry???
That is what the education and training are for.
Do u believe in automobile driver 's ed.? U bet your life.


So tell me, David, are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry?


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
C'mon, David. You actually make some decent points for your side of this issue at times...
but this is so far over the top, I am astonished you ever posted it.
I believe in EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
In 1956 the USSC declared in Browder v. Gayle that government
discrimination regarding a few moments of seating on a public bus
was an intolerable violation of a citizen's (Rosa Parks's)
Constitutional Right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
An ordinary citizen, not just an elevated elite; this addresses
what I call the Saints and Angels interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, to wit:
THE 2nd AMENDMENT WAS NOT ENACTED ONLY TO PROTECT
THE SAINTS and ANGELS OF AMERICA: EVERYONE HAS AN EQUAL RIGHT, EQUAL RIGHT,
EQUAL RIGHT TO DEFEND HIS OR HER LIFE
from predatory violence.
When 7 year old Noah Yates was being dragged to his death in Andrea 's bathtub,
I wish he 'd been lucky enuf to snatch up a gun from somewhere. He NEEDED it.

Wud u have told him NO!, Frank? "C'mon, Noah get to the tub; u dont need guns; TOO YOUNG!"??
U 'd have told him to keep his hands OFF of any guns and let her drag him
to the bathtub. He did. The supporters of gun control got their wish:
the victims were un-armed. The predator survived intact. Congratulations!
David


Ummm...perhaps you did not fully understand the question, David.

Allow me to re-word it:

Are you actually serious in trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry???
OK. I thawt that I had successfully answered your questions,
but I 'll try to be more specific and more explicit:

1. Yes. I believe that sufficient education and repeated training
in competent gunnery practices, drilled over and over and over
will result in fewer accidents because of the effectiveness
of those inculcated safety measures.

2. In regard to intentional shootings:
I believe that criminals will know from experience
and observation of their fellows that their pursuit of violence
is un-safe for them and leads to an early grave. (Q.V. Travon Martin case.)
I believe that will have the effect of reducing the incidence
of violent felony, thereby obviating violent defense therefrom.

If u deem my reply to be in any way lacking,
then please bring that to my attention and I will address your concerns.





David
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:41 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

RexRed wrote:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWTiR7ak7K7A_N0ZL0FrjMq3bmWSCdHyiapV6bi7PZxQfiL1Fa08NlDKZb
I 'm back.
The children whose death shud be stopped
shud be well armed in their own defense,
at the earliest feasible age, as I armed myself at age 8.
Thay shud be trained in school in effective, efficient defensive gunnery
and in safe gun handling practices and repeatedly drilled over and over.
David
Frank Apisa wrote:
Are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...
and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year olders were given guns to carry???
That is what the education and training are for.
Do u believe in automobile driver 's ed.? U bet your life.


So tell me, David, are you actually trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry?


Quote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
C'mon, David. You actually make some decent points for your side of this issue at times...
but this is so far over the top, I am astonished you ever posted it.
I believe in EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
In 1956 the USSC declared in Browder v. Gayle that government
discrimination regarding a few moments of seating on a public bus
was an intolerable violation of a citizen's (Rosa Parks's)
Constitutional Right to EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.
An ordinary citizen, not just an elevated elite; this addresses
what I call the Saints and Angels interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, to wit:
THE 2nd AMENDMENT WAS NOT ENACTED ONLY TO PROTECT
THE SAINTS and ANGELS OF AMERICA: EVERYONE HAS AN EQUAL RIGHT, EQUAL RIGHT,
EQUAL RIGHT TO DEFEND HIS OR HER LIFE
from predatory violence.
When 7 year old Noah Yates was being dragged to his death in Andrea 's bathtub,
I wish he 'd been lucky enuf to snatch up a gun from somewhere. He NEEDED it.

Wud u have told him NO!, Frank? "C'mon, Noah get to the tub; u dont need guns; TOO YOUNG!"??
U 'd have told him to keep his hands OFF of any guns and let her drag him
to the bathtub. He did. The supporters of gun control got their wish:
the victims were un-armed. The predator survived intact. Congratulations!
David


Ummm...perhaps you did not fully understand the question, David.

Allow me to re-word it:

Are you actually serious in trying to sell the idea that America would be a safer country...and have less accidental and on-purpose shootings if all
of our 8 year-olders were given guns to carry???
OK. I thawt that I had successfully answered your questions,
but I 'll try to be more specific and more explicit:

1. Yes. I believe that sufficient education and repeated training
in competent gunnery practices, drilled over and over and over
will result in fewer accidents because of the effectiveness
of those inculcated safety measures.

2. In regard to intentional shootings:
I believe that criminals will know from experience
and observation of their fellows that their pursuit of violence
is un-safe for them and leads to an early grave. (Q.V. Travon Martin case.)
I believe that will have the effect of reducing the incidence
of violent felony, thereby obviating violent defense therefrom.

If u deem my reply to be in any way lacking,
then please bring that to my attention and I will address your concerns.
David


Okay...let me start with:

Quote:
1. Yes. I believe that sufficient education and repeated training
in competent gunnery practices, drilled over and over and over
will result in fewer accidents because of the effectiveness
of those inculcated safety measures.


So you are actually saying that arming all the 8 year old kids in America with guns...will result in fewer accidental and on-purpose shootings.

Hummm.

Bizarre that you think that...but it certainly is your right.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:47 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Why are you ignoring the use of education when it comes to firearms? You are completely by-passing this portion of what he said and what he believes.


OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 03:55 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Can I, in good conscience, try to violate the rights of 8 year olds,
which I enjoyed, treasured and valued myself at that age and up??

Wud I be a hypocrit?

That reminds me of anti-gun freedom politicians
like Sen. Diane Feinstein who carry their own defensive guns.





David
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 05:14 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

Why are you ignoring the use of education when it comes to firearms? You are completely by-passing this portion of what he said and what he believes.





I am not bypassing it at all.

David is entitled to his opinion...and when I asked him for clarification...he gave it. He was honest with me...and I was honest with him in return.

I think it bizarre.

Grammar school kids toting guns around, in my opinion, is a recipe for disaster.

Sorry you think I am not allowed to have an opinion...nor a right to express it truthfully.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 05:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Can I, in good conscience, try to violate the rights of 8 year olds,
which I enjoyed, treasured and valued myself at that age and up??

Wud I be a hypocrit?

That reminds me of anti-gun freedom politicians
like Sen. Diane Feinstein who carry their own defensive guns.

David


You were honest with me, David. I was honest with you in return.

No problem...we simply disagree about kids having guns.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 05:20 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Whether someone needs a tool
depends on whether a job arises, whatever your age is.


When I was around 1O, give or take,
I had some dogs threaten me in the streets.
Thay did not fully attack and I did not fully shoot them,
but u cannot always know what is gonna happen. It pays to be prepared.





David
parados
 
  3  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 05:34 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:

Quote:
OmSigDavid said: @RF- The authoritarians wud like u to believe
that there were no murders nor other violent felonies before
guns were invented. Maybe Julius Caesar was never assassinated ??

Ha ha yes; even if guns were banned, people would simply switch to using clubs, swords and knives to kill each other..Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Cesar-sa_mort2_zps4aa2fff0.jpg~original

So instead of 1 person killing 12 it would then require 12 people to kill one. Seems like a fair trade off to me.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 06:20 pm
@parados,
IF someone is MALICIOUS and he turns his creative attention to it,
he does not need guns to wipe out a good portion of humanity.

NO guns were in use during the events of 9/11/1
nor the big event of Aug. 6th, 1945.

The actual weapon is the HUMAN MIND,
whose creative manifestations express its intentions
, not the outward gun.


Soon that mind will improve 3 D printing,
so that government will only be an ineffectual witness
to the Constitutional freedom of the American citizen,
regardless of what liberals in government or out of it want.

We will have freedom from gun control the same as we have sunlight.
That will re-establish the status quo ante as of c.191O.
The defeat of liberalism gives me THRILLS to be an American.





David
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 06:47 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Whether someone needs a tool
depends on whether a job arises, whatever your age is.


When I was around 1O, give or take,
I had some dogs threaten me in the streets.
Thay did not fully attack and I did not fully shoot them,
but u cannot always know what is gonna happen. It pays to be prepared.


David


Fine, but our disagreement was not about this.

You claim that arming all the 8 year old kids in America with guns...will result in fewer accidental and on-purpose shootings.

I disagree...and I disagree strongly.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 01:01 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank please refrain from reposting what tiny penis David and Romeo post and a few others in these threads.

I have them both on ignore and you reposting their cloaked wishes for some viable penis cream to make their non existent dick size grow only exacerbates their agony.

If you must respond to them one way is by doing it in one of many of their cry for help gun threads.

I know Frank we are both on the same side of this issue but their vicious and unfeeling character deserves no rebuttal.

The truth needs no defense. I plan to keep posting the gun control stuff here and ignoring them and it might be a better approach to respond to the gun "control" avenues and leave the trolls to mourn about their short and useless sexual members.

They are just bating you and their intent is purely greedy and selfish.

I will be posting things and it might be a better approach to respond to the positive side of the argument rather than be lured into their agonizing small dick posts.

They should realize that no one really cares what they think anymore. If anyone cared they would be in THEIR threads. We get it, we understand the source of their pain and there is no point in going round and round with such idiots.

They don't understand that we also support the second amendment too. But we support it in a healthy and constructive way and not in a myopic, sick and loathing way.

My advice is ignore them and they will get the message that they need to consult a psychiatrist for their penis envy problems..

I will take what ever steps necessary to not be reminded of their hateful and inconsiderate presence here.

Let this be a warning to others who want to post their parasitical tiny penis fearful posts here, the ignore button works for you also.....

Not ignoring them is just enabling them.
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 01:03 am
@Frank Apisa,
And David's tiny penis posts reveal he also hates women...
 

Related Topics

NRA: Arm the Blind! - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Thoughts on gun control..? - Discussion by komr98
The Gun Fight in Washington. Your opinons? - Question by Lustig Andrei
Gun control... - Question by Cyracuz
Does gun control help? - Discussion by Fatal Freedoms
Why Every Woman Should Carry a Gun - Discussion by cjhsa
Congress Acts to Defend Gun Rights - Discussion by oralloy
Texas follows NY Newspaper's lead - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 06/19/2025 at 12:04:42