Guns And The Laws That Govern Them

AGREED that it does
and never disputed.



That is a very, very foolish thing to say.
EACH citizen shud apply it as SELFISHLY as he possibly CAN.
The Constitution certainly WILL work, with everyone being selfish.


NONSENSE; I challenge u to show us where the Constitution says that.
The correct answer is: NO WHERE.
That 's just your wishful, leftist imagination.





David

High school soccer game cancelled after man shows up with a holstered pistol
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/09/27/1241862/-High-school-soccer-game-cancelled-after-man-shows-up-with-a-holstered-pistol

I believe that it is SAFER
to have a holstered revolver.
Pistols r not sufficiently mechanically reliable, in my experience.
Thay jam too much.

We 'd be a lot better off if ALL soccer games were cancelled
in favor of gunnery practice, instead. U get practical benefits therefrom.
Your accuracy improves.





David

Seems like a reasonable request that was eventually followed. What's the problem? Seems like the media is doing it's job of spreading fear of gun owners. Happy Rex?

Family feud leads to four shooting deaths, relative says
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/29/20738665-family-feud-leads-to-four-shooting-deaths-relative-says?lite

Guns to keep your family safe...

Do you suggest that these gun stories not be told, white wash the truth?

Why are you afraid of the truth about these guns and the people who are senselessly dying every day from them?

You claim they keep you safe and most of these cases are proving guns only more rapidly kill people. Why not use a knife and show people the true barbarity of these gun owners?

How about the media show the dead corpses and the whole gruesome truth that doctors and emergency room angels have to face when such tragedies are confronted?!

Guns are a worse scourge on society than lung cancer...

Gun advocates are more deceptive than tobacco companies.

The Takeaway: Fleetwood Mac Guitarist Bob Welch Commits Suicide
http://blog.aarp.org/2012/06/08/fleetwood-mac-bob-welch-death-guitarist-suicide/?cmp=BAC-OUTBRAIN-BLOG_8448198_The-Takeaway-Fleetwood-Mac-Guitarist-Bob

Louisiana pastor shot and killed during sermon, suspect in custody
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/28/20734478-louisiana-pastor-shot-and-killed-during-sermon-suspect-in-custody?lite

You got your wish, more guns in church...

Even guitarists have the right
to end their lives when that want to.





EVERY citizen shud carry his guns with him EVERYWHERE he goes.
The place where a citizen has the right to defend himself
is the place where he is ATTACKED.
US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Moore v. Madigan (2013)

More retarded crap...

OK. U can feel that way if u wanna.

We won; (freedom won). U lost.
Suppression n intimidation lost,
as of the USSC 's decisions in HELLER
and in McDONALD in 2008 and in 2010, respectively. That 's what COUNTS.





David

White wash the truth? White washing the truth is not doing news stories about the defensive use of guns. The media prefers the narritive of gun violence. Since this thread started, I have been posting these types of defensive stories but you seem to ignore them along with the rest of the media.

Here's couple for ya:

http://www.thereporter.com/crimebeat/ci_24111070/vacaville-resident-shoots-intruder

http://www.gwinnettcounty.com/portal/gwinnett/NewsandEvents/NewsDetails?url=/Content-Types/Paragraphs/NewsandEvents/PolicePressReleases/Homeowner%20Shoots%20Home%20Invasion%20Suspect.xml

Two children were outside on a public street in San Bernardino, Calif.
when a pit bull attacked them. As the children tried to escape from the dog,
the children’s aunt picked up a toy scooter and attempted to use it to
fight the dog off. A neighbor noticed the attack, retrieved a gun,
and shot and killed the dog.

Following the incident, the aunt explained to a reporter that she was
fearful for the children’s lives and said that the armed citizen is a hero.
One of the children was taken to a local hospital for her injuries, but is now fine.

It’s not because John Hickenlooper doesn’t support their cause, but that their presence has backfired in a big way in Colorado. The governor tells USA Today’s Susan Page that it might be a good idea for Michael Bloomberg and his allies to stay out of Colorado:

Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper suggests national gun-control groups stay away from a looming recall battle that could switch control of the state Senate to the GOP. The groups poured money into an unsuccessful defense of two state lawmakers recalled over their gun votes earlier this year.

“Colorado is a state that people like to be themselves and solve their own problems,” the Democratic governor said in an interview with Capital Download, USA TODAY’s weekly video newsmaker series. “They don’t really like outside organizations meddling in their affairs, and maybe the NRA gets a pass on that, but [it is] probably not a bad idea” for gun-control groups, such as the one established by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, to curb their efforts if gun-rights activists collect enough signatures to force a recall vote on state Sen. Evie Hudak, a two-term Democrat from a suburban district north of Denver, he said.
Page asks Hickenlooper whether Hudak opponents will get enough signatures for a recall, and Hickenlooper predicts not — but notes that his prognostication track record hasn’t exactly built confidence:

“I’m going to guess it’s probably 50-50″ that they will be able to get the recall vote on the ballot, but, he noted, “I didn’t think they’d get enough signatures for the first two.”
Coloradans don’t take to people coming in from out of state to tell them how to live. That’s also apparently true of ObamaCare, which is the first topic of discussion in the video. The new health-care paradigm is still very unpopular among Colorado voters, and Hickenlooper notes that the state exchange has had “its share of challenges” in the first two weeks. Maybe Hickenlooper should have just stuck to marijuana legalization.

The “no thank you” from Hickenlooper to Bloomberg may be amusing, but it’s also probably too late. Hickenlooper and his allies overreached on gun control, believing that the Boulder and Denver elite represented the political temperature of the rest of the state. Two key Democratic state legislators discovered belatedly that they had miscalculated, especially in the heavy-handed manner in which they had imposed their new gun-control regulations. Now Hickenlooper wants to talk about the beneficence of simple universal registration, but Democrats went way beyond that in Colorado and Washington and exposed their real end goals — banning weapons and curtailing access to firearms for law-abiding citizens. This backpedaling isn’t likely to convince Coloradans to lighten up on their pursuit for political accountability.
[All emphasis has been added by David.]

Football argument prompted dad's fatal shooting of teenage son, Morgan County sheriff says
http://www.indystar.com/article/20131014/NEWS02/310140015/Football-argument-prompted-dad-s-fatal-shooting-teenage-son-Morgan-County-sheriff-says?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1



Typical gun lover...

The latest "good guy with a gun" making his family and the rest of us safer. (cynical)

He showed poor sportsmanship.
He shud be ashamed.

The level of dishonesty in this post is amazing!

1. obamacare is un-constitutional.
It does violence to the liberty-based concept of the Founders.

2. No one shud be subjected to the
interference of compliance with gun control,
because it is the product of USURPATION
of jurisdiction, based on hoax.

Getting your guns "with no questions asked" is like going to Church
"with no questions asked" or opening a newspaper "with no questions asked"
or staying home from Church and sleeping "with no questions asked".
It is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.

If any questions WERE asked qua gun possession,
the correct answer is: "that is none of your business."





David

Feed the poor...

Even though you used " un-constitutional" rather than "unconstitutional" ...the fact remains that SCOTUS says it is constitutional.

What are your reasons for suggesting we take your word on the constitutionality issue over that of the SCOTUS?