Yes you did.
And I have clearly addressed your decade long point on it!
You might just as well replace that X for flying Tea Pots...the point can be Universalized and subsumed under the umbrella of what we can know or not know. Its is a problem of epistemology! And the name for those who argue we cannot know is Agnose (without knowledge)!
Thus what I have addressed was the problem at large Universally by showing that pleading for strong agnose is self contradictory!
...now go back and read it until your eyes fall flat. I rather not have to make this a futile "yes you did no you didn't" kind of discussion. I have nothing against you and I am just going through the motions. Either you address my point directly rather then reiterate yours and show me a flaw, or drop it for good.
There is no dodging, no diverting, no squirm! Just pure cut clean straight forward LOGIC!
You might not fully appreciate what I wrote back there but you are in hot water! Now either you show me the flaw or you keep arguing alone. I will only reply to a cut clean point regarding the Logic of my counter from now on!
The problem with Frank is that he picks a ill defined concept and runs with it to bluntly state for a decade that everyone is guessing because the ill defined X did not show up yet. It makes as much sense as speaking of pink flying elephants and saying that everyone is guessing wildly. Strawman!
Unless he can provide an extensive definition with all the properties of God without exception pleading for ignorance is moot. He seams to lack the will or understanding to get the point that any fair theologian would grant at the start of a conversation. That is, what is your definition, and lets go from there to see what we can know. Pink flying elephants are not in the same category of black swans.
Good morning Frank hope you feeling well this morning and everything is OK back there. He shall speak of more productive topics in the future, not this one.
Hey, take it as a victory will ya...I rather don't lose my interaction with you because of stubbornness, or entrenchment or whatever it is, maybe my poor English, or deficient logic amassments. Maybe you have a point that is hidden in a blind spot of what my mind can grasp. Leave it be. I really don't understand how you came to that conclusion and it seams whatever I tried to explain to you in multiple facets has fallen in def hears. We should not ever push people beyond what they are willing to give freely!
Hope to keep seeing you around old man, all the best!
Sorry this is a topic we cannot discuss. It is one that holds the most interest for me...even more than today's turbulent politics.