@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:One of the reasons i think it is a mistake to attempt to intervene is that it's not just a case of feeding the polar bears--when their environment changes, it changes for every other species who live there, too.
Well this complex issue revolves around who points the finger where for the the current warming trends. I would think that if we were so worried about interdependence of species, we would have been more "green" in our developments and encourage environment green policies early on, keeping in mind the interdependence between the environment and our development.
The comparison of the past is good, but all it shows is a contrast showing that there wasn't a problem of declining sea ice levels.
Currently there is a precipitous drop in Arctic sea-ice levels year after year. One can hope that there are sufficient ice floes left further up north that is sufficient for the polar bear population to survive on, and global warming doesn't impact Arctic sea ice very intensely in the coming years. If we are to blame, then I would hope that we take responsibility and possibly try to intervene beneficially.
But since seeing your convictions on the matter, am I correct in assuming that you currently hold the belief that we humans don't have a large role in the current trends indicating a global warming?