8
   

Can an object be accelerating and yet -not- moving?

 
 
MattDavis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Feb, 2013 07:30 pm
@dalehileman,
You would eventually understand it. It's just a matter of time invested. Very Happy
Follow wherever your interests take you. If that question is important to you, I will try to point you in the right direction.
dalehileman
 
  0  
Reply Wed 27 Feb, 2013 07:33 pm
@MattDavis,
Quote:
I will try to point you in the right direction.
I feel honored
0 Replies
 
north
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Mar, 2013 07:08 pm

I just thought of this scenario

A car for example , parked

But the Earth is accelerating , rotation

Hence the car is not moving , but is accelerating

dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 11:46 am
@north,
Quote:
Hence the car is not moving , but is accelerating
That's a good q, North, a matter about which I've long wondered. Whereas the gravity is pulling straight down, isn't any force on account of rotation pulling at a slight angle
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 12:39 pm
Hey! this could be exploited to make flying cars like on the Jetsons!
dalehileman
 
  2  
Reply Sat 9 Mar, 2013 12:42 pm
@contrex,
Hasn't someone already broached the possibility, that is, for some reason gravity quits or the Earth stops rotating

Seems however we're just a bit OT here. "Can an object be accelerating and yet-not-moving?", almost everyone in the affirmative

…..except me, I have this nagging feeling that the ball actually stops up there, and on a purely mathematical basis, namely that its reversal at the top is, though infinitesimal, a stop; a point at which the graph is horizontal



Again I'm no mathematician (as I'm sure you will agree) but I have this intuitional take: Just as there are different kinds of infinities (for instance based on different rates of development), there are also different kinds of zeroes
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  2  
Reply Thu 15 Feb, 2018 04:45 am
@rosborne979,
rosborne979 wrote:
Are you sure the definition of acceleration accurately describes the object right at the moment in time when it's velocity becomes zero.

Acceleration is the rate at which the velocity of a body changes with time. So if you're talking about a tiny moment of time when velocity is essentially zero, then both time and velocity equal zero in that definition, and there can be no "rate of change" as the moment of time approaches zero.

Sorry, but no. When you throw a ball up in the air and it slows until it stops, at that instant, its velocity is 0, but it's acceleration is 32 ft/sec^2 downwards. An object's may have any velocity paired with any acceleration.
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Feb, 2018 06:09 am
@Brandon9000,
I have Physics degree and taught Physics.

Brandon is 100% correct.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Physics of the Biblical Flood - Discussion by gungasnake
Suggest forum, physics - Question by dalehileman
The nature of space and time - Question by shanemcd3
I don't understand how this car works. - Discussion by DrewDad
An Embarassment to Science - Discussion by Leadfoot
Gravitational waves Discovered ! - Discussion by Fil Albuquerque
BICEP and now LIGO discover gravity waves - Discussion by farmerman
Transient fields - Question by puzzledperson
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/02/2020 at 10:15:45