Reply Tue 30 Mar, 2004 01:20 pm

Thanks for that clarification. "rejection" was perhaps the wrong word "augmentation" is certainly better with respect to the formal model.
However this does not quite capture the epistemological aspect of "space is curved" or better "matter tells space how to curve - space tells matter how to move".

Similarly perhaps to consider multivalent logic as an "augmentation" of binary logic fails to reflect the paradigmatic "history" of such a modification, or the philosophical positions taken thereto.

We are discussing here the relationship of "the model" to "reality" and since the latter is philosophically problematic, we must expect as much about the relationship itself, and the concept of "coherence".
0 Replies
Reply Tue 30 Mar, 2004 02:17 pm
Those interested in coherence might like:

0 Replies

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
DOES NOTHING EXIST??? - Question by mark noble
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
  1. Forums
  2. » Non-Contradiction
  3. » Page 9
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/19/2019 at 11:01:00