@fresco,
I accept your point: I bleieve we basically agree that the problem is a tricky one, and worthy of debate. I approach this from a scientific point of view, which is less poetic. I appreciate that your approach is different. The point I am trying to make is that we can discuss things for our own entertainment regardless of any external meaning.
This is the case for science where we have a concept of pure science. Ironically pure science has proven to have more applications.
I would argue that there is a meaning to our words beyond the sum of their parts which is intangible. I accept this is metaphysical, however I would always take a holistic rather than reductionist approach. I will not argue for the existence of the intangible seeing as I am arguing against the existence of matter. I find that argument amusingly ironic. As per Kant, can we be reasonable.