Is it possible to prove the existence of an insouciant Dog?

who gives a parc?

all the dogs i've believed in have cared



for non caring one needs to believe in cats

Gasp ! ! ! !

Blasphemy ! ! ! ! !

As ever'body know, cats is the spawn of SATAN ! ! !

dogs care

dogs care about carrots

dogs care about strawberries

dogs care about where the water tastes best

dogs care about who hasn't rubbed their belly lately

dogs are verra verra caring people

Based on animal husbandry, dogs were bred to care. There is a fairly newish book about Rin Tin Tin. Apparently, only as recently as the 1890's a German aristocrat scoured Germany for the best shepherd dogs. Picking out the forebears of Rin Tin Tin, he set the stage for the German Shepherd. By WWI, Germany had the breed ready to help the men in the trenches.

Anyway, any breed today was a working dog, for some function, sometime in the past. Only today have we relegated dogs to the function of affecting companionship, which doesn't say much for the evolution of human society, in my opinion.

Yes, but they're insouciant--they don't worry about things. Anyway, we re talkin' Dog here--Capital "D" Dog.

Now, if Miller would take her sock puppet and leave, we can have a lively discussion.

they don't worry but they care
I know they do

Puppies love me, that I know.

Well, Set, these dogs are yawning because someone took the pis out of etemology.



Not exactly Clio and Bailey.

I, for one, believe in Dog. I like it with a little mustard and relish on it at the ball game.

I have met many insouciant dogs....

There was something in the paper at the weekend about it being dangerous to feed your dog grapes. My dog just lazes around and lets the birds eat her breakfast - she's never asked me for grapes - or strawberries.

Our dogs believe in eat-omology.

I shall neither bow nor givinity of a belief in Dog.

Long pant he on.

Episcopally man's bestie cannot be distempered.