first the sphinx wasn't originally a mans head on a lions body, that was just some pharaoh who wanted glory, so when he began reconstruction on the sphinx instead of placing another lion head ( the pharaoh may not have even known that the head was originally a lions, but think about it logically , lion body . . .) he placed his own face on there instead.
evidence: well aside from the fact the head of the sphinx is proprotiantly tiny by comparison to the rest of the body, the head is made of a completly different kind of rock! it was just stuck on top!
as far as the pyramid goes, how can egyptologists still claim khufu (there are records of khufu restoring the pyramid, no record of him building it though), khafre and menkura were the builders of the three pyramids?
evidence (and this isnt everything):
- the most obvious of them all, there are no writings in any of the three pyramids (please don't tell me a scribble of "khufu" in an air shaft means he built it, come on, honestly!), the egyptians are well known for their writing , they loved to leave their mark everywhere. if the khufu really did build the great pyramid he would have completely covered it with heiroglyphics as would khafre and menkura.
- another obvious point, where is the treasure? grave robbers i hear you say, most of the chambers they have opened were previously sealed since construction ( whenever that was), how did these grave robbers manage to get in?
- i guess the third most obvious point, where are the embalmed pharaohs!!! no bodies were ever discovered in the three pyramids , unless you want to include a mummy archaeologists claimed they found in the third pyramid of menkura that mysteriously disappeared on a boat on its way to be analysed. even if it was a real mummy, it could have easily been a normal mummy found else where and placed there to be found.
- they are out of order, khufu reigned before khafre, yet the pyramid of khafre is smaller than that of khufu, as is the same with menkura. If they were capable of building the great pyramid, wouldnt it then follow logic that they would be able to build a bigger and better pyramid the next time around? but instead they become smaller, i ask, where is the logic in that?
- they simply stop building them to that degree of size and acuracy after the pyramid which alegedly was built by menkura, apparently reverting back to their crude and inferrior methods of pyramid building. wouldn't they gain knowledge and experience by building the pyramids which would improve the quality of workmanship, and their tools would have advanced as well. suddenly reverting back to inferior methods, right . . .
- the pyramid wasnt even built in the fourth dynasty!! it was built some time (i have no idea how much) before the end of the last ice age. the melting of the ice created a flood which managed to cover the pyramid. i say this as salt sediment (obviously we are talking sea water here) and many fossils of sea creatures were found at the base of the pyramid, so they were clearly covered in water at some point.
i would go into the astronomical ramifications of the three pyramids, but that would be several pages of scientific data, i dont think you really want to read all of that.
im not claiming aliens did it, although i think its possible, im simply stating that there is no possible way the egyptians of the fourth dynasty built the three pyramids of giza, it just doesnt add up, they merely saw three magnificint structures and decided to claim ownership, khufu was first so logically he claimed the largest pyramid, followed by khafre and so on.
sorry for rambling, its a topic i feel very passionate about.